The content of this article is only used for the first publication of today's headlines, please do not plagiarize.
The only female prime minister in India's history has proposed castrating eight million men to complete family planning, but it failed. The reason for family planning in India is that the population of India has exceeded its limit, and the government cannot afford to live on such a large number of people.
As China's fertility rate has continued to decline in recent years, India's population has almost surpassed China to become the world's most populous country.
Despite the poverty and backwardness of the living environment, Indians are still very capable of living, so that the population is still growing by leaps and bounds, growing at a rate of 1.1% per year.
The failure of family planning has led the Indian government to claim that thanks to this failure it saved India, but was the sacrifice of these eight million men worth it?
Indira, the only female prime minister in India's history, was the only daughter of India's founding father and national hero Jawaharlal Nehru, but her reign did not improve the miserable situation of Indian women.
India's caste system divides people into three, six and nine, and women have a lower status, and are even called the existence of "treating dogs".
However, India faced an unprecedented economic crisis in the seventies, and in order to reverse this situation, Indira decided to castrate eight million low-caste men. The move is shocking, but India's one-child policy seems trivial in the face of this.
There have been family planning policies in India's history, but they quickly proved ineffective due to the lack of effective measures and popular support. However, then-Prime Minister Indira did not give up.
She believes that the root cause of India's poverty problem is overpopulation, and family planning is a necessary measure to solve this problem. Therefore, she resorted to extreme measures and mass castration of men in order to control population growth.
Indira's approach caused great controversy and criticism. On the one hand, she is believed to be violating individual rights, and on the other hand, her methods are also accused of being too extreme, even barbaric and cruel.
However, Indira did not give up, she firmly believed that she was doing the right thing and that she did achieve some results. Under her leadership, India's population growth rate has declined and poverty has eased somewhat.
However, Indira's approach has also had some negative effects. In addition to violating individual rights, castration has led to a number of health and social problems. Many families have fallen deeper into poverty as men castrated and have lost their breadwinners.
In addition, castration surgery has also led to some psychological and social problems, affecting the stability and development of Indian society. In conclusion, Indira's castration policy is an extreme example that has achieved some results but also brought some negative effects.
For India and other developing countries, how to control population growth is a crucial issue. Before taking any action, we need to think deeply and weigh carefully to ensure that individual rights are not violated and that there are no further negative consequences.
The Indian government implemented a family planning policy called "End Poverty" in the 70s to control population growth. However, this policy has caused a lot of controversy and opposition.
As a result of this policy, many low-caste men were forcibly sterilized to meet birth control targets. The government even linked social welfare to sterilization, in violation of human rights and morality. While the policy does not apply to high-caste elite men, it is implemented in a brutal way.
Many have become victims of surgical infections or deaths. According to statistics, at least 8 million low-caste men were forcibly sterilized during the implementation of the policy. This policy has exacerbated the gap between the rich and the poor in society and aroused dissatisfaction and opposition among the people.
As a result, this policy was ultimately considered a failure, but its effects persist in Indian society. India's population is about to surpass China to become the world's most populous country, but this does not mean that India will enjoy the demographic dividend.
In fact, India's second family planning has failed because forced castration has caused psychological shadows for eight million men, making Indians generally disgusted and afraid of birth control.
Although the Indian people believe that they have more development potential than China, 30% of their newborns are illiterate, and quality education is not guaranteed, making it difficult to form population competitiveness.
In contrast, China's newborns are trained in an all-round way, and quality education is valued and the quality is higher. Moreover, despite China's declining fertility rate, China, as the world's second-largest economy, has the capacity to feed a population of 1.4 billion.
India, on the other hand, has a smaller land area, is not as large as China's, and has a huge gap between the rich and the poor in the country, and feeding the world's largest population is still a huge challenge. Therefore, a large population does not mean a large demographic dividend, and it is better to give birth than to produce well.
As India's population continues to grow, India is under increasing pressure. If you want to feed so many people, you need more arable land to grow more food, but this also means that the pressure on urban infrastructure will increase.
In addition, India is still heavily dependent on labor-intensive industries and has no potential for industrial transfer. This has led to India's growing environmental problems, which are not conducive to long-term development.
India needs to take a hard look at its own demographic problems and find a long-term development path that suits its national conditions. This will require comprehensive consideration of environmental, economic and social aspects in order to achieve sustainable development. Only in this way can India meet even greater challenges in the future.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.