With the enhancement of environmental protection awareness and the needs of agricultural development, the straw burning ban policy has been gradually implemented in rural areas of the mainland. However, the implementation of this policy has raised a number of problems, one of which is the withdrawal of farmers. This situation worries grassroots cadres, because they know that the cold heart of farmers will have a non-negligible impact on agricultural production.
Over the past few decades, straw burning has been a common way for farmers to dispose of crop residues. However, this traditional practice has brought serious environmental problems, such as air pollution and declining soil quality. In order to improve the quality of the rural environment and increase the yield and quality of crops, the government has introduced a straw burning ban. Under this policy, farmers are no longer allowed to burn straw directly, but are required to use other methods such as returning it to the field, composting, and making biomass fuel.
However, the implementation of this policy did not go as smoothly as expected. Many farmers face difficulties in not being able to adapt quickly to new treatments. They may lack the technology and equipment or believe that the change will increase their labor burden. As a result, some farmers have chosen to withdraw from agricultural production rather than face new challenges. This phenomenon worries grassroots cadres, who know that the withdrawal of farmers will have a huge impact on agricultural production.
The withdrawal of farmers will lead to a decrease and instability in agricultural production. Agricultural production in rural areas depends mainly on the labour and experience of farmers. The withdrawal of farmers will lead to barren farmland and less acreage of crops, thereby reducing the supply of agricultural products. This will have an impact not only on the livelihoods of local farmers, but also on the food security and economic development of society as a whole.
In the face of this problem, grassroots cadres should take positive measures to solve it. First, they should strengthen publicity and training for farmers to understand the significance and benefits of the straw burning ban. At the same time, relevant technical support and equipment are provided to help farmers adapt to new treatment methods. Second, farmers can be encouraged to adopt environmentally friendly straw treatment methods through policy incentives and subsidies. In addition, grassroots cadres should work closely with relevant departments and experts to jointly research solutions and provide better support and assistance to farmers.
In short, the implementation of the straw burning ban policy has caused concern among grassroots cadres about the withdrawal of farmers. The withdrawal of farmers will have a non-negligible impact on agricultural production. In order to solve this problem, grassroots cadres should take active measures to strengthen publicity and training, provide technical support and equipment, and encourage farmers to adopt environmentally friendly straw treatment methods. Only in this way can we ensure the smooth implementation of the straw burning ban policy and ensure the stable development of agricultural production.