The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, the diplomatic turmoil between China and South Korea has intensified, causing diplomatic relations between the two countries to become tense and even escalating to the point of mutual recall of ambassadors. South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue's Taiwan remarks at the G7 summit were the flashpoint, and she listed the Taiwan issue as a "global issue" and advocated Taiwan's participation in international organizations, a position that sparked strong opposition from China's Foreign Ministry. China adheres to the one-China principle and believes that the Taiwan issue concerns national territorial integrity and sovereignty and is the core principle of China-ROK relations.
However, instead of curbing its provocations, South Korea has pressed China on other fronts, escalating tensions between the two countries. China has put forward clear requirements for South Korea, hoping that the two sides can cooperate, respect each other, and take care and understand each other on key issues. China stressed that South Korea must abide by the one-China principle, refrain from making erroneous remarks, refrain from participating in military cooperation against China, and safeguard China's legitimate rights and interests on the Korean Peninsula issue.
However, South Korea's disobedience to China's warnings, and even claims by lawmakers that they would expel the Chinese ambassador to South Korea or downgrade diplomatic relations, have aroused strong resentment in China. On June 13, South Korean President Yoon Seok-yue questioned the words and actions of Chinese Ambassador to South Korea Haiming Xing at a closed-door state meeting, saying that his lack of mutual respect and friendly attitude had sparked discontent among South Korean citizens. A senior person in the presidential office said that the presidential office paid close attention to Ambassador Xing's remarks, emphasizing that the Chinese ambassador should be a bridge to promote friendship between the two countries, and improper statements may harm the national interests of both sides. South Korean politicians have also begun to question blindly listening to foreign ambassadors, escalating the situation to unprecedented heights.
The South Korean side has shown a rather tough attitude, and the provocation against China is worrying. However, such an approach could lead to a further deterioration in diplomatic relations between the two countries. Public opinion generally believes that South Korea may ask China to recall its ambassador, an action that has been interpreted as a violation of international conventions by the Chinese ambassador. The South Korean Foreign Minister warned that all the consequences would be borne by the ambassador himself and did not rule out the possibility of expulsion by listing him as persona non grata. The incident has sparked widespread criticism from politicians from all walks of life in South Korea, indicating that Sino-South Korean relations are facing a serious crisis of rupture.
Overall, tensions in Sino-South Korean diplomatic relations are far from subsiding, and tensions remain high. How to resolve the current dispute and restore the friendly cooperation between the two countries is an urgent task facing both sides. The two sides need to resolve their differences through dialogue and negotiation in a constructive manner so as to maintain regional peace and stability and promote the common prosperity and development of the international community. It is hoped that the two sides can calmly respond, avoid taking actions that intensify confrontation, and find a win-win way out.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.