laitimes

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

author:April 1st Flower

Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

Japan's discharge of nuclear wastewater officially began. This also caused the world to start to panic. The mainland has directly restricted Japan's imports of aquatic products. But in the overall world environment, few economies have expressed resentment.

The United States, the largest economy in the Western world, has also expressed support for Japan, and the U.S. ambassador to Japan has also said that he will go to Fukushima to taste the contaminated local "food".

Although the news was buried in the later stage in the ridicule of netizens in South Korea and the world. However, the response given by the United States, as a world power, has always made the public dissatisfied. And after the news that the United States had restricted imports of Japanese seafood products in the first half of this year.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

There is also a conspiracy theory that the main supporter behind Japan's sea exclusion is not the South Korean authorities, but the United States Biden is acting as a driving force. And the main hype authors of this conspiracy theory are the American people themselves.

All kinds of performance also mean that the status of the United States in the field of public opinion has also continued to decline, and the world has understood at this time that the freedom and peace that the United States has always advertised are more of a disguise.

New messages

After the United States remained silent about the drainage of the sea, Japan began to promote the rationalization of the drainage through the media. According to a report by Japan's Yomiuri Shimbun, they said that after the discharge into the sea, everything was normal in and around the Fukushima Sea.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

It also said that it had not received any unexpected news caused by nuclear sewage. However, according to the detection of offshore waters, in fact, the tritium ions in seawater sampling have increased significantly, even if the level is still lower than normal.

But it also caught the world's attention. South Korean sources pointed out that Japan has canceled the sampling authority of other countries in Fukushima. Judging from all the practices, it is clear that Japan wants to make the sea drainage a joke.

This American-style approach also shows that Japan has learned the American approach to the fullest after serving as the younger brother of the United States for a long time. But Kishida's government may not be more persuasive than the United States.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

This gap comes from the size of the economy and the power of the world. At least Japan does not receive more support in the international community. And it is not a permanent member of the United Nations.

Brazilian President Lula has said he wants to join Japan in the permanent seat of the United Nations. But this idea has not received more support, at least in the eyes of China and Russia, this demand has never been allowed.

France retorted

On September 3, Japan's Tokyo Electric Power Company held an event and invited journalists from all over the world to Fukushima to visit Fukushima's nuclear sewage discharge equipment. And this approach is obviously an attempt to use the world media to help Japan whitewash itself.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

And indirectly expressed a so-called openness and transparency, and also refuted the previous news from the South Korean side. However, the result of the act did not develop as expected by Japan, but elicited a rebuttal from France.

According to the relevant information, a French journalist asked after the visit that if it really wants to improve credibility, then why does Japan not invite a third party to participate in the monitoring work. Faced with this question, the staff on site refused to answer.

This performance shows that Japan has become weak-hearted. At the scene, he began to show that his calculation method was very reasonable, and also said that the International Atomic Energy Agency was involved in the work of seawater detection.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

This statement is a response to the French reporter, but it has no effect, nor has it had any effect on the communication level.

analyse

From the analysis point of view, the so-called Fukushima in Japan has no problems, in fact, it is only a short time, and the data of tritium ions in seawater has risen, which also shows that there are indeed certain hidden dangers in the discharge of the sea.

And if there is really no hidden danger in Japan's discharge into the sea, or if it is really reliable as Japan claims, then why does Japan not choose to test seawater with many countries in the world? Even if you do not choose to co-detect, then it is possible to open the detection permission.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

At least in terms of public opinion, there will also be a favorable situation for Japan. However, Japan's refusal to cooperate in testing also means that the Japanese side has always shown some weakness in the matter of draining the sea.

And the French reporter's question has clearly pierced this layer of window paper. But in the follow-up information, Japan also responds to this, which may also mean that the Japanese side will choose silence in the next step.

epilogue

Between doing something wrong and doing something bad, Japan chose the latter. And the world is obviously unacceptable to Japan's approach. However, the drainage has already begun, and the effect of trying to target it through sanctions or other means is always short-lived.

The French reporter made a challenge and asked many parties to monitor Japan's nuclear contaminated water, and Japan's response was weak

The key is how to effectively respond, in the development of science and technology, the next step may need to weaken the impact, but this new direction of scientific and technological development may not produce results in a short period of time, and what can be done at this stage is only to protect yourself.

Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan.

Read on