Recently, according to the British "Mirror", Camilla recently privately suggested that Charles III follow his mother Elizabeth II and resolutely not consider abdication. Camilla feared reprisals if Prince William succeeded to the throne.
However, this proposal was not supported by all members of the royal family. Among them, Princess Anne made it clear that this decision needs to carefully consider the long-term impact.
As a senior member of the British royal family, Princess Anne is regarded as the "royal overseer" by the outside world. Her public statement against Charles following the queen's example and never abdicating the throne will undoubtedly have an important impact on the future development of the royal family.
Since ascending the throne, Charles has been because of Diana and Camilla's relationship. It has been facing pressure from public opinion to abdicate. Whether the 73-year-old should follow the example of his mother, Elizabeth II, who died at the age of 96, and stick to the lifelong system is a matter of discussion. Camilla, who was worried that her position would be damaged after her abdication, strongly persuaded Charles III to follow the queen's example and not consider the issue of passing on the throne for life.
But Camilla's suggestion was opposed by Princess Anne. Anne publicly stated that this momentous decision must be carefully considered for all aspects of the impact and cannot be taken lightly.
Why did Princess Anne firmly oppose Charles following the Queen's example? The considerations behind this are worth pondering.
First of all, as a senior member of the royal family, Anne knows the way the royal family works well. She is well aware of the complexity and sensitivity of the issue of succession to the throne, and if she breaks with tradition without permission, it will cause great shocks inside and outside the royal family.
Second, with Anne's foresight, she certainly foresaw the negative effects of the move. Prince William, as a core member of the new generation, is the most popular and anticipated royal figure by the public. If Charles directly ignores the inheritance issue and does not consider the succession, it will inevitably be regarded by the outside world as selfish and arbitrary, ignoring public opinion, and will attract public condemnation. This will undoubtedly seriously undermine the public's sense of identity with the royal family.
Moreover, there are practical difficulties in never abdicating. Charles III is already over the age of flowers, and if he wants to emulate the queen and live to the age of 100 to pass on the throne, I am afraid that he will not be able to do so. Uncertainty about physical condition can also become a hidden danger to the royal family's public image.
Finally, this also concerns William and Kate's rights. If Charles III does not abdicate for a long time, it is equivalent to indefinitely delaying the succession to the throne of the two men, which will inevitably lead to conflict between them. This is also not conducive to the stable unity of the core of the royal family.
To sum up, Princess Anne's opposition attitude is comprehensive and thoughtful. This shows his insight, and it also makes the outside world admire this "royal overseer" even more.
It can be said that Princess Anne's statement reflects the consideration of the long-term development of the royal family, rather than just from a personal standpoint. As the "royal overseer," it makes sense for her to express her views on core decisions.
It also highlights Anne's special status in the royal family. As the only daughter of the Queen, she was loved and trusted by her mother. Even though she no longer has a public obligation, Anne has a say in private and has influence over the direction of the royal family.
This also reflects from the side that the British royal family is not monolithic. Camilla and Anne have different positions on the succession of the throne, indicating that the royal family members have their own considerations. This is necessary for a holistic discussion of a core topic.
For the outside world, Anne's statement also provides a new perspective on the royal family. It shows that the British royal family is not dominated by the king alone, and that different members will express their views on core issues and make efforts to maintain the interests of the royal family as a whole.
As Charles' rule gets on track, the issue of abdication will also become an unavoidable reality. Let's wait and see if Charles will follow Camilla's advice, accept Annie's point of view, or if the two sides will compromise between the two views. Whatever the final decision is, it will have a profound impact on the future direction of the British royal family.