OnePlus Ace 2 Pro was released on August 16, Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, 1.5K curved screen, IMX890 main camera, 9140m㎡ giant VC vapor chamber, OnePlus 11 Android maximum 0916 X-axis motor, rare high-level fingerprint in the same class, 150W fast charge, priced at 2999 yuan for the 12+256 version, 3399 yuan for the 16+512 version, and 3999 yuan for the 24+1T version.
Appearance / Workmanship / Feel / Fingerprint Recognition / Discharge & Vibration
Although the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is the same as the previous generation with a 150W fast charge, it is already a completely different new solution.
Charger model VCBEJACH, C port, perfectly compatible with Green Factory's own 100W fast charge, up to 45W PD, but does not support 20V gear, resulting in many notebooks can not be used.
OnePlus 11, OnePlus Ace 2 Pro, Redmi K60 Extreme Edition ↑
(OnePlus Ace 2 Pro has aurora green, titanium empty gray color scheme, are glossy glass + plastic middle frame, 163.1x74.2x8.98mm, 210g weight.) The screen is Asahi Glass AGC glass, which supports wet hand touch, and the back cover is Gorilla 5th generation glass).
The average person really can't tell the difference between the OnePlus 11, OnePlus Ace 2, and OnePlus Ace 2 Pro. Each camera of the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro has a ring of metal decorations, and the camera matrix is the most complex and exquisite of the three.
At first, I thought the mute switch of the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro was a bit strange, and then I looked, blanch, how did it switch with the volume keys? The left border only has an empty silent toggle (but I raise three hands in favor, because the setting of Green Factory and OnePlus putting the volume keys on the left has never been used to it...). ）。
- Protection: There is a wet hand touch function (the promotional video is directly a spray test), but there is no dustproof and waterproof certification. This machine can be waterproof but not engaged in certified operation, refueling is estimated to be a little impressed.
- Workmanship: Similar to the K60 Extreme Edition.
- Feeling: A little thick, brush the record 9140m㎡ VC vapor chamber is not a joke, this is really half a gaming phone.
- Fingerprint recognition: ultra-thin optical fingerprint under the high position, all stand up! (In 2023, ultra-thin fingerprints can become touching points, Gan!) ）。 The location is about 2cm higher than that of a friend, even if the national prestige comes over, this is also to say: comfortable!
- Outside: The sound quality and volume are very good, it feels a little stronger than the Find X6 Pro, and the old machine owner is sour.
-
Vibration motor: OnePlus 11 Android largest + strongest 0916 X-axis motor. Just four words - invulnerable, I'll tell you.
Powerful and crisp, so strong that you can walk on the desktop with your mobile phone. If you don't wear a shell, don't put it directly at the bedside, the alarm clock vibration can really vibrate the phone off the bedside table. Adjust it to 1/5 to 1/4, which is the strength of the common 0809 motor, and vibration enthusiasts will definitely like it.
In addition to no IP68 certification (actually has unknown protection capabilities) and wireless charging, the peripherals of OnePlus Ace 2 Pro are all bursting true flagship level.
Objective test: screen & performance & heat & battery life & charging
The default touch sampling rate is 120Hz, and there will be a peak wave close to 720Hz the moment the finger stops, which has never encountered similar phenomena in previous models↑
(Screen Test)
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is a 6.67-inch 120Hz curved screen, the first BOE Q9+ substrate, 2772x1240, 450ppi, all-white peak 1200 nits, local peak 1600 nits. 720Hz touch sampling rate, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming + Pixelworks X7 independent graphics chip (high frame and high resolution concurrency).
Eating the double dividends of baseband and resolution, OnePlus Ace 2 Pro brightness performance is very good, dry flip part of Samsung 2K E6 model, color accuracy performance is excellent, uniformity is decent (506/508/538/536 nits in the four corners when manually all white, extreme value 32 nits).
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is still a green factory/OnePlus familiar operation - medium and high brightness low-frequency PWM dimming, about 90 nits brightness, will automatically switch 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming.
Is it intentional? Or carelessly? Different screens from different manufacturers are tuned like this, apparently on purpose (low-frequency PWM tolerance warning!). ）。 For users who are sensitive to low-frequency PWM, it is recommended to bypass or turn on the dark mode to alleviate it.
(Performance test: 3 colors represent CPU, GPU, flash read and write performance, the higher the score, the better (the color bar represents the ratio of the test to the best score, the longer the better)
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro equips the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 with a 9140m㎡ VC vapor chamber, LPDDR5x memory + UFS4.0 flash memory.
The actual performance output is the normal Snapdragon 8 Gen 2+1TB storage, and the 24GB memory has no significant gain for running scores.
(Test environment: room temperature 26 degrees, 200 nits screen brightness)
- 3DMark Wild Life Ulimited tested 94.3% stability.
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Ulimited tested stability of 66.1%.
- The maximum temperature of the 3DMark roaster is 48.4 degrees.
- When the room temperature reaches 28 degrees, both tests will be aborted by the overheating warning.
The thermal stability is general, the temperature control is relatively conservative, and the temperature difference between the front and back sides of the fuselage is huge (more than 5 degrees), which is not at all like the performance of equipped with a 9140m㎡ VC vapor chamber. I wonder if OnePlus deliberately added a compartment on the back to reduce the body temperature? Or is it some other reason?
Under the same conditions, iQOO 11S (4013m㎡), which has less than half of the vapor chamber area, has a stability of 99.8% and 93.2%, respectively, although the temperature is 52.7 degrees.
(In the same environment, after 20 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD + extreme frame rate + anti-aliasing), the maximum temperature is 39.1 degrees, which is a little higher for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.
(Battery life test: the test environment is 26.8 degrees room temperature, 200 nits screen brightness, and the test power range is 30% to 80%). Including 30 minutes of "Peace Elite" HDR HD + extreme frame rate + anti-aliasing, 30 minutes of 1080P video playback on station B, 30 minutes of Weibo short video, 30 minutes of Wi-Fi and 5G surfing each, a total of 2.5 hours)
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is a 5000mAh dual cell, with SUPERVOOC S power management chip, plus BOE Q9+ this top substrate for 1.5K screen, the actual battery life is quite good.
photograph
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro claims to have OPPO's flagship algorithm (light and shadow tuning, portrait, super score, etc.), and gets the same ProXDR display function as the Find X6 Pro (HDR effect in the album):
- Front 1600W, S5K3P9, 1μm, 1/3.1", F2.4.
- Main camera 5000W, IMX890, 1μm, 1/1.56", F1.8+OIS, equivalent 24mm
- Ultra-wide angle 800W, IMX355, 1.12μm, 1/4'', F2.2, 16mm equivalent
- 200W macro
We are also welcome, and found the "enemy" Redmi K60 Extreme Edition (IMX800+OIS+F1.77) and iQOO 11S (IMX866+OIS+F1.88) for comparison. They are all 800W tactical ultra-wide angles, but the iQOO 11S has an OIS-free telephoto of 1300W, S5K3L6, 1.12μm, F2.46.
In fact, when taking photos, IMX800/IMX890/IMX866, all 5000W+1μm. The strongest here is the IMX866 (which has a larger equivalent light intake because of the RGBW arrangement), but the iQOO also has the smallest aperture. The biggest disadvantage of the K60 Extreme Edition hardware is that the number in the name of the IMX800 is too small.
"2x zoom" comparison
"2x zoom" vs. 1, global and central magnification (when the light is good, iQOO's optical 2x is advantageous, and the amplitude is not large)
"2x zoom" vs. 2, global vs. central magnification (cloudy afternoon, the light is weaker, iQOO's 2x telephoto kneeling)
Ultra-wide contrast
Ultra-wide contrast1, global and center magnification
Ultra-wide contrast2, global vs. central magnification
Ultra-wide contrast3, global and central magnification
Ultra-wide angle to 4, global and central magnification
Ultra-wide vs 5, global vs. center magnification
Main camera comparison
Main camera vs. 1, global vs. center magnification
Main camera vs. 2, global vs. center magnification
Main camera vs. 3, global vs. center zoom in
Main vs 4, global vs. center magnification
Main camera vs. 5, global vs. center magnification
Main vs 6, global vs. center magnification
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro main camera focus and shutter response is fast, and the main camera is almost non-clamped, and there are very few sample outputs that cannot be handled, which is what you want with 24GB of memory?
The main camera has an equivalent focal length of 24mm, but it is actually very close to the iQOO 11S's equivalent of 23mm (physical focal lengths are 5.59mm and 5.56mm, respectively). The white balance is a bit "blues", the metering is more accurate, I like the dark part, and the discrimination is better. The disadvantage of the main camera is that the 2x algorithm is mediocre, HDR is less aggressive and extremely violent sharpening, and it may be the most aggressive mid-to-high-end phone this year.
Ultra-wide-angle multi-frame synthesis is extremely positive, the slow shutter duration of night scenes is more exaggerated than vivo, and low-light scenes will have more than 2 seconds, resulting in average film rate, but it is indeed significantly stronger than iQOO 11S in terms of white balance and detail, and it is far from the ultra-wide angle of the K60 Extreme Edition.
If the late firmware can reduce the sharpening force, the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro will definitely be the best camera among the 3, but now it can only be forcibly judged to be "five or five with the iQOO 11S".
150W fast charge: force big brick fly!
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro has been replaced with a completely different 150W fast charging scheme, and the same as the 150W version of the Realme GT5, it is a violent 11V x 13.7A=150W output. brush
The new record of 13.7A ultra-large current is fiercer than the real 240W fast charge (20V 12A), and the data line has grown a little fatter.
The huge current is the secret of "17 minutes full charge + conversion efficiency 99% + the industry's highest charging efficiency of 100 watt fast charging".
The low-voltage current scheme of the green factory is to hand over the voltage conversion to the charging head, and the mobile phone is directly charged:
- The advantage is that the mobile phone has low heat, fast speed, and fast charging while playing (the selling point of the official blowing hard)
- The disadvantage is that the huge current has high requirements for the charging line, high cost, and poor compatibility.
With a larger battery than its predecessor, the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro also fully charges faster.
The extreme power exceeds 138W, and the current even exceeds 13.7A (then burn our KM002C test table). 14 minutes and 45 seconds display 100%, 17 minutes to discharge.
1 minute charge to 10%, 3 minutes 28%, 5 minutes 43%, 8 minutes 65%, 10 minutes 77%, 12 minutes 88%, 13 minutes 94%.
In the case of a larger battery, it is still close to the iQOO 200W fast charge that has been pushed down. Although there is still a gap with the 200W fast charge of the first version of iQOO, this is the strongest 150W fast charge today, and there is no one, sweeping the shame of the previous generation of 150W fast charging scheme.
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro not only charges quickly, the charging temperature is not high, and the 9140m㎡ VC vapor chamber is a benefit to charging.
Coupled with the 5000mAh battery capacity and this low-voltage solution, charging while playing will not greatly reduce the power advantage. I would like to call it the most dessert today's ultra-high power solution.
Of course, there is also a price, that is, compatibility regression. In order to heat up low and charge while playing, compatibility is abandoned, which is very green.
The charger model VCBEJACH is perfectly compatible with Green Factory's own 100W fast charge, up to 45W PD. But the maximum voltage of PD is 15V (there are 15V 3A and 11V 4.1A gears), which is not a common 20V, and many notebooks do not have this gear and cannot be charged.
Some mobile phones that run 20V high-voltage QC/PD/PPS cannot run at full strength (the previous generation of 160W fast charging head, although it is also 45W PD, but it has a 20V gear)... The only one here who will be happy may be a user with a 10V 4.5W fast charge in 45V 45A gear ...
To keep this strongest data line, it can run a huge current of 13.7A, and down is the real me 240W (20V 12A) and OPPO 100W fast charge (11V 9.1A).
The charging head, with the real me 240W and OnePlus Ace Pro's 160W (20V 8A) fast charging head, can not make OnePlus Ace 2 Pro full blood fast charge, the current is "limited" to 12A and 8A respectively, the theoretical peak is only 132W and 88W.
From the perspective of the popularity of the current model, the green factory should be looking at the "low-voltage and high-current" solutions of 11V x 9.1/13.7 A.
24GB RAM: It's still a big brick flying!
After all apps on the desktop are opened, 4.75GB of remaining memory in the background is available
The previous main machine was Find X6 Pro, which moved all application data 110GB to OnePlus Ace 2 Pro with "mobile phone moving".
Open the first layer of the desktop and 8 other apps in the folder in one go, a total of 42 (including WeChat and WeChat doppelganger).
At this point, the body is already warm, and until the last few large apps are opened, the application opens very quickly.
After waking up the next day (10 hours), the service is running with the cached process as above↑
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is based on 24GB of memory, and by default also opens 4GB of memory expansion, you can even open to 24GB+12GB. I'm just a good guy, our desktop at Shenzhen Bay One only averages 32GB of RAM.
Usually, if you open the app continuously, the remaining memory will be more than 6GB. WeChat is a small and beautiful spicy chicken, and the mini programs will not be squeezed out even if they open 8 or 9, but after cutting out to open other apps for a few minutes, some "large" mini programs will still be cleared of the background.
Reflected in the daily use of 20, 30 apps, basically they can hang in the background, no need to wait, this is the experience of iOS in the early years (now iOS can't do it).
And the 72-hour background maintenance promoted by OnePlus turned out to be a background whitelist for these national games such as peace elites, and the chicken that was opened 3 days ago was still opened in seconds before entering the picture.
Such an exaggerated backstage remains, I didn't dare to dream of it before, the Oscar screenwriters didn't dare to write like this, and my typing hands were shaking.
Plus the basic battery life is good, even if the App is opened wildly and never cleaned up, the battery life of the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is still better than that of the Find X6 Pro. are 1 charge per day, 10% of the electricity left before charging, now there is generally 30% left.
The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro with 24GB of RAM was used as the main machine for more than 1 week, and the biggest feeling - blanch! That's the backstage mechanic I've always dreamed of on Android!
However, the reality is still a bit regrettable:
- If the app is not locked, fat and large ones like Meituan will occasionally be squeezed out of the background.
- The camera is still a memory destroyer, take a few more photos, and a lot of background will be squeezed out. In front of the camera, Genshin's "running score apps" are considered to be following the rules.
- Even if you have 24GB of memory, except for apps such as WeChat QQ that are whitelisted by default, ColorOS's background lock is still up to 5 apps #¥@... ￥#......#￥%&@￥&*@#%@#￥......@！ If I can unblock this limit, my life with 24GB of RAM will be 2.234345 times better!
- Before using the 24GB memory mobile phone, I felt that "laughing to death, I can't use it up at all", but there will be a hidden worry of "it may be soon, it is not as cool as it is now", especially after personally viewing the background cache process: in addition to the background occupying WeChat in GB, shopping, maps, banks, videos, browsers, smart home appliance apps, all of them can eat 500MB of memory by themselves, and their memory occupation is still growing...
summary
In addition to no wireless charging, no telephoto for photos, the almost bursting peripheral configuration of the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro allows me to seamlessly switch from the Find X6 Pro, and I can also feel the surprise of 24GB memory from time to time. But the 24GB memory version has too much markup, and it is more recommended to buy the other 2 versions, and now the 16GB memory is not worth it at all.
K60 Extreme Edition and OnePlus Ace 2 Pro, even the price and product settings are opposites:
- The most amazing thing about the K60 Extreme Edition is the price of the 2599, and although everything is not perfect, the 2599 is indeed perfect.
- OnePlus Ace 2 Pro is not very amazing in price, but performance, fingerprint, vibration motor, charging are sub-top or top-notch, is a typical "Xiaomi 1 generation mobile phone".
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro and K60 Extreme Edition have the same price difference of 400 yuan, replaced by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, curved screen, 150W fast charge, stronger photo algorithm, high-position fingerprint, Android's largest vibration motor, but less IP68 (a humidified hand touch demonstration used water spray test, but the mobile phone did not do protection level certification), and 400 more expensive.
The main slots/regrets, whether it is mid-high brightness or low-frequency PWM dimming, the workmanship has not been able to open the gap with the K60 Extreme Edition, the body is a bit thick (although it feels more comfortable than the K60U because of the curved screen), and the background lock limit of ColorOS. The plastic frame, no wireless charging, no protection level, these are small problems.
After the test, we can boldly say: the 400 yuan difference is worth the money.
When using the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro, I often think of the Xiaomi 1 generation from 2011.
In that era when the mainstream of Android APKs was a few MB, the Xiaomi Mi 1 was dual-core 1.5GHz + 1GB memory + 4GB storage. I feel like I can't use up its performance and memory in my life.
For the next 12 years, I changed the latest and strongest flagship every year, but I never experienced the speed of opening all applications in seconds like the Xiaomi Mi 1:
In 2011, QQ was less than 4MB and WeChat 457KB. And 12 years later:
• QQ is 306MB (80 times)
• WeChat is 249MB (550 times)
• Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (no unified comparison platform)
• 24G RAM (24x)
• 1TB storage (256x)
Among the three large items of CPU/memory/storage, the memory capacity is the slowest to grow (24 times). In the face of 80 times to 550 times the growth of the App, it seems impossible to make today's mobile phones as calm as they were back then.
In 2011, hundreds of K of WeChat, tens of M traffic, but we had a very happy life. Harm, mobile phones and us, can not go back.
Whenever I think of this, there is only one sentence: the domestic Android ecology, I say that they are a piece of defense, who is in favor and who is against?