The issue of straw burning has sparked widespread controversy in the mainland in recent years. We have to admit that some people have gone so far as to say that the experts' recommendation to ban straw burning is just a ploy to sell pesticides and fertilizers. So whether this statement is reliable or not, let's analyze it well.
First, you have to figure out why the expert made this advice. Experts agree that burning straw is not a good thing. Why? Because this thing will release a bunch of harmful gases and small particles, which is a great threat to our health and the environment. Dry burning of straw can also easily cause fires, which can make farmland, forests and cities burnt. That's why experts call for sustainable ways to treat straw, such as returning it to fields, composting it, and even developing biomass energy.
Others say that experts are tricks to sell pesticides and fertilizers? Don't be funny, experts are honest people, research is based on empirical data, the purpose is to make our agriculture and environment develop healthily. They are not here to sell pesticides and fertilizers, but also to take care of our soil quality, water resources and ecological balance. To say that experts are there to sell goods is to fool the professional ethics and responsibility.
So what motivates and values do experts recommend? To put it bluntly, it is to protect the environment and improve the level of agriculture. First of all, the pile of harmful things released by burning straw has too great an impact on air quality and our health, so they are right, banning straw burning can make us breathe better air and a better living environment.
Secondly, experts advocate the use of straw to return to the field, compost, and organic fertilizer. This not only reduces the need for fertilizer, but also makes the soil in the field more fertile and the crops grow stronger. Don't look at the straw is inconspicuous, but it turns waste into treasure, which not only solves the problem of incineration, but also brings benefits to agriculture.
In addition, experts say that we can also use biomass energy, that is, turn straw into biogas, biopellets and biofuels. In this way, not only can the countryside have enough energy, but also reduce the dependence on traditional oil, but also help the environment, which is good, right?
But some people also say, is the expert's advice reliable? Let's take our own international context. In fact, many countries in the world have long banned the burning of straw, such as Europe and the United States. Through good management, people have effectively controlled environmental pollution, environmental protection and agriculture have achieved a lot of results.
In China, our experts do not eat dry food, they personally went to the fields to investigate, and also carried out a lot of scientific research, which proved that it is necessary and feasible to ban the burning of straw. They supported their recommendations with air quality monitoring data, soil improvement experiments, and studies on the use of agricultural waste.
In short, don't believe the bullshit that accuses experts. The experts' recommendations are science-based and aim to protect the environment and promote sustainable agriculture. We should support the experts, listen to their advice, and work hard for our environment and the future of agriculture!