The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Cross-Strait Economic and Trade Relations: ECFA's Test and Taiwan's Concerns
Economic cooperation between the two sides of the strait has always been the focus of attention from the outside world. In this economic interweaving, one of Taiwan's "Three Treasures", Chen Jizhong, expressed his concern about ECFA in a radio interview. This agreement, known as one of the "Three Treasures of Taiwan", is one of the important agreements on economic cooperation between Taiwan and Chinese mainland. But Chan's concerns don't stop there, he is also concerned about Chinese mainland to investigate barriers to trade barriers, but he is helpless in the face of the problem.
These trade barriers can be divided into four main areas: textiles, petrochemical traditional industries and agricultural products. While the DPP has consistently stressed that these trade barriers account for only 0.9% of exports and are mainly agricultural products, it has ignored problems in other areas. For example, Taiwan's petrochemical industry exports up to 25% of its Chinese mainland, and if the ECFA is terminated, Taiwan may face a huge political shock.
Chen Jizhong's neglect reflects some important issues. First, he seems indifferent to trade negotiations and Chinese mainland proposals, without a real understanding of the serious consequences that could result. Second, Wang Meihua once said that negotiations could be conducted without preconditions, but in fact this attitude was not put into practice, but instead seemed to be waiting for a WTO ruling. Third, once the ECFA is terminated, Taiwan may not be able to receive the amount of concessions from the Chinese mainland, and will face an annual economic loss of $50 billion, which may not even be affordable.
The current situation of Taiwan's economy has been beautifully presented to the world, and a series of data such as growth rate and development have emerged in official propaganda. However, without the infusion of Chinese mainland this living water, Taiwan's trade deficit could be as high as $50 billion a year, a significant disadvantage compared with South Korea.
In other words, regardless of political stance, cross-strait economic and trade relations are closely related to Taiwan's economy. Even if Taiwan no longer participates in ECFA, it will be difficult to get rid of the trade deficit, let alone find new markets. As Gou said, once ECFA is repealed, it will be a disaster for Taiwan.
In Taiwan, however, economic issues seem to have been replaced by ideology. Gou made it clear at a press conference that the repeal of ECFA would have a devastating impact on Taiwan's economy. At the moment, emphasizing ideology can lead to three problems: first, the difficulty of coexistence with money; Second, there is no complicity with economic development; Third, the quality of life of ordinary people is threatened.
The DPP seems to be using ideology as a tool to interfere with economic, trade, political and military operations, but this approach may not be worth the cost. Mr. Chan claims to be prepared, but when faced with actual ECFA issues, especially trade barriers, he may find that the actual situation is far less than expected.
To sum up, the economic cooperation between Taiwan and Chinese mainland is not only an exchange at the economic level, but also involves many fields such as politics and people's livelihood. Although the future of ECFA is full of tests, abandoning ideological interference and seeking more pragmatic solutions may better ensure Taiwan's economic stability and development.
The key to cross-strait economic cooperation: win-win and challenge
In the economic cooperation between Taiwan and Chinese mainland, ECFA has become an important and complex issue. The agreement covers a wide range of fields, involving trade, investment, industrial cooperation and other aspects between the two sides of the strait. However, in this cooperation, challenges are also increasingly apparent.
The concerns expressed by Chen Jizhong in the broadcast interview reflect the hesitation and confusion of the Taiwan government on the ECFA issue. He was concerned about the purpose of ECFA, particularly with regard to initiatives to Chinese mainland investigate barriers to trade. However, he also admits that he lacks solutions when confronting these problems.
Trade barriers are divided into four main areas: textiles, petrochemical traditional industries and agricultural products. Among them, trade barriers to agricultural products are mentioned the most, but they are only the tip of the iceberg of the whole problem. In fact, the petrochemical industry occupies an important position in cross-strait trade, and 25% of petrochemical products are exported to Chinese mainland. If ECFA is terminated, Taiwan's political situation and economic development may face unprecedented challenges.
However, Chen's neglect seems to reveal some important facts. First, he seems to lack sufficient understanding of Chinese mainland's proposals and trade negotiations to appreciate the serious consequences that could ensue. Second, he mentioned Wang Meihua's statement that negotiations should be conducted without preconditions, but this has not been implemented in practice, and a situation similar to waiting for a WTO ruling has occurred. Finally, when the ECFA is terminated, Taiwan may not be able to reap economic benefits from the Chinese mainland and may face an annual economic loss of $50 billion, which Taiwan's economy cannot afford.
In the propaganda of the Taiwan government, the economic growth rate and development are often the highlights. But can such data mask the real problem? Without the support of Chinese mainland huge market, Taiwan's trade deficit could be as high as $50 billion, a huge gap compared to South Korea.
Although Taiwan may choose not to participate in the ECFA, the trade deficit may not disappear. In other words, cross-strait economic relations are far more complex than ideological considerations. Gou emphasized the potentially disastrous consequences of ECFA's repeal, yet Taiwanese politics seems to have put ideology on the fore.
This situation is not conducive to cross-strait economic, trade, political and military cooperation. Chen Jizhong mentioned that the preparations are ready, but in the face of the real ECFA
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.