Recently, an article by People's Daily Network "Give full play to the unique advantages of rural college students" has aroused heated discussions among netizens: Are rural college students really only worthy of returning to the countryside? The comment section rolls over constantly! Simply put, without in-depth research, sitting in the office to come up with the article, it is strange to stand with everyone's feelings.
At the beginning of the article, the people's net threw out a bunch of sweet beans and a bunch of rainbow candy, praised rural college students, and unknowingly led to the title of "rural college students".
After enclosing the students from the countryside in a small circle, People's Daily began to educate: some rural college students found that when they applied for jobs, urban children had more interests, easier to communicate with strangers without barriers, and had richer internship experience.
I don't know where the conclusion "it's easier to communicate with strangers without barriers" came from, it's good that there are statistics, it's just that I'm afraid that someone will pinch their fingers in the office and come up with such a conclusion.
The only child is accustomed to being "self-centered", and can even communicate "inclusively" between different individuals without barriers, this conclusion is really quite hardcore!
City kids have more hobbies, that's for sure! Children in the city, when they go to kindergarten, they begin to think about extracurricular training courses, swimming classes, taekwondo classes, piano classes, art classes, vocal music classes, Go classes, and all of them can think of in the city.
And children in the countryside are out of school, and there is never-ending farm work from their parents. Children in the city, their parents take turns to do their homework at night, and children in the countryside have to work hard to help their parents finish the farm work in order to make time to look at their homework. Isn't it obvious that children in the city have more hobbies than children in the countryside? After all, farming and rural work cannot be called a hobby!
Then, People's Daily Network said that rural college students have a better understanding of the situation in rural areas, are more likely to gain the trust of villagers, have better knowledge and broader vision, and they can quickly adapt and make great achievements in rural areas.
Do rural college students really know more about rural areas? If it is relatively the so-called urban college students, it is indeed more knowledgeable. If it is a relatively rural person who has not gone to college, it is quite unfamiliar.
Some rural children with good academic performance, most of them have left home to study since childhood, and go home to help their parents during winter and summer vacations, these rural college students who go out, basically forget about the farm work, and their strength can not keep up, after finishing college, in addition to their parents and parents planted ripe melons and fruits, the rest are too strange to them!
The point is that rural college students can't go back to the countryside to farm! If you do not farm, you must learn to engage in production and operation, where will the funds come from, where will the cost and technical guidance for specialized operation come from, and who will teach them hand-in-hand?
Even if things are planted and tourist villages are repaired, where is the market? How do you revitalize their operations? If you know about the one-acre and three-point land at home, can you come up with a market? Figured out how it works?
The vision of rural college students and urban college students itself is already far apart, and as a result, as soon as they graduate, they will pull rural college students back to the countryside, and if the university years can really improve a person's quality and ability in an instant, then there will be no distinction between rural college students and urban college students.
On the whole, this article is all about soliciting support and sponsorship for rural college students, but the operation of hurriedly coaxing rural college students to return to the countryside is really confusing!
Can you casually interview a rural person who has children going to college, and they want their children to go back to the countryside? You can just find a rural college student who has passed all the way from the countryside to the city, and if they have the opportunity in the city, are they really willing to return to the village? It's safe to say that no!
Now many rural young generations, even if the husband and wife have a hard time, they have to go to the county to rent a house, find a little livelihood in the city, so that their next generation can enjoy urban education with children in the city, in order not to let the children return to the countryside, and then live their life facing the loess with their backs to the sky!
Some netizens with a hot temper said that letting rural college students return to the countryside is to grab job opportunities such as tobacco, electricity, and oil with college students in the city?
In this way, the children of farmers continue to go home as farmers, and the children of the city continue to tell the hard stories of three generations of tobacco people, three generations of tax collectors, and three generations of oil people?
There is nothing wrong with supporting rural college students to develop in rural areas, but we should not only remember to fool rural college students to go home, rural areas are the homes of rural college students, they will come back to build sooner or later, but please also give them a chance to survive and work in the city, a chance to build better rural areas in the future.
In the countryside today, many young people are far away, and there are few in the village. If there were better opportunities for development and self-realization in the village, they would have returned home long ago.
To solve the problem of rural development, it is not necessary to fish back rural college students in every possible way, but to pull college students in the city over! The former educated youth, the former third-line construction, that is the highlight of the prosperity of the countryside!
Articles about rural college students still have to be written by rural children themselves. University graduates in the city, sitting in an air-conditioned house and writing things, can't catch the outside atmosphere.
If it is really for the good of rural college students, really for the future construction of rural areas, what needs to be done is to provide employment opportunities for rural college students in the city as much as possible, provide a stage for improving their capabilities, and provide a platform for obtaining resources, so as to truly inject impetus into rural development.