#夏日生活打卡季#
First of all, to show my personal attitude towards the purchase of LV-logo canvas bag for 580 yuan:
Now me: Don't buy it. Because now I think more about the practical value of the goods I buy.
I'm about 20 years old: Most likely to buy. Although "poverty" will affect food, it can satisfy curiosity and even a little "vanity" and obtain psychological satisfaction and pleasure - although it may be short-lived.
There is a self-proclaimed "intellectual media leader, value inheritor" named "Southern Metropolis Daily", which directly gave a seven-character evaluation of "poor, stupid and vain".
From these seven-character evaluations, we can feel their negation of the consumption behavior that produces vanity due to lack of self-confidence - I personally take this to a certain extent!
But these seven words also deeply reveal one word, that is, "poor" of "Southern Metropolis Daily"!
"Poor" vs. "Not Poor"? Then take (1) the breadth and depth of its roots, which preceded the reform and opening up atmosphere, and (2) the principles of truthfulness, objectivity, timeliness, balance, and social responsibility that the news media should use as a reference. Can this newspaper answer the following questions?
What is the objective basis for the seven-character evaluation?
There is only a seven-word review, and nothing else. Have you conducted an interview survey on the age, gender, occupation, spending power and habits of the people who bought LV.-logo canvas bags for 580 yuan? How do you come to the conclusion that you are poor, stupid, vain? There is no objective interview investigation, only subjective assumption evaluation, as a media, such professional behavior, poor?
Why not explore the logic behind this consumption behavior further?
Behaviors have behavioral logic. What is the business logic of the merchant to engage in this activity? What is the consumption logic and psychological logic of consumers? If you conduct in-depth interviews and investigations, I believe that it will be a good feedback for business and market practitioners. And the media in the Pearl River Delta, which has been immersed in a highly developed market economy for many years, only has a seven-character evaluation, and the breadth of vision and depth of thinking of such professions are poor?
Do you speak up about what's close at hand?
The seething "Arctic catfish" is almost 100 days old. Did you keep track of it? Do you speak dynamically? You may say that this will have to wait for the conclusion of the investigation of the authoritative department. The question is, do you always keep track of the following push? Are you just sitting and waiting for authoritative conclusions? If so, is such professional conduct poor?
Have you taken the initiative to play a role in the local fight against corruption?
The newspaper was founded in 1997. Under the strong will and thunderous action of the Party Central Committee to fight corruption, Wan Qingliang, former secretary of the Guangzhou Municipal Party Committee, Cao Jianliao, former vice mayor, Xu Zongheng, former mayor of Shenzhen, and Chen Rugui, former vice mayor, were beheaded. As a local media, have you taken the initiative to play a role such as public opinion supervision? Secondly, have you initiated and actively exposed some local irregularities? If not, such professional responsibility and social responsibility, poor?
If we can give our audience a positive answer to the above questions, then we can safely respect you and your opinion.
Losing its voice before a major news event, and making categorical and scathing comments on the people who bought a bag for 580 yuan, such a media deeply suspects that it is really "poor and stupid"!