When it came time to volunteer to fill in the college entrance examination, no matter how many scores they scored, whether they could get 985, 211 or could only go to an ordinary university, they were all caught in a deep anxiety about volunteering. Based on the scores you get, do you choose a higher-ranked school as much as possible, a more preferred major, or a city your child has longed for for a long time? I think many parents and children are full of confusion, you are afraid of wasting every hard-earned point, and you are afraid of falling into various "pits" and eventually regretting it. As a result, a new industry was born, and college entrance examination volunteer filling consulting institutions and "teachers" sprung up.
Among the many consulting institutions and "teachers", Zhang Xuefeng is undoubtedly the most shining one. Zhang Xuefeng, as an "expert" in education auction and training consulting institutions, has become an Internet celebrity graduate school entrance examination master, a graduate school practitioner, and a college entrance examination consultant in recent years because of his sharp comments on major famous schools and his provocative language style. For some of his views, some people like it, and some people question it.
Recently, Zhang Xuefeng has once again caused widespread controversy because of his complaint about the "journalism profession". When someone asked his child to fill out the news major, he said, "If my child reported the news, I would definitely knock him unconscious and then let him report to the individual." ”
The reason why Zhang Xuefeng advised people not to apply for journalism is mainly the problem of difficulty in employment, believing that journalism majors have no technical content, the threshold is too low, and jobs are difficult to find. Zhang Xuefeng has previously attracted attention for persuading students with average family conditions not to apply for clinical medicine, and his argument is that the cycle of clinical medical learning and training is long, and students need to make money as soon as possible. Also, he does not recommend that children from poor families apply for philosophy, English and some basic subjects.
In short, it is not difficult to see from Zhang Xuefeng's series of remarks that the support of his thinking is that children from poor families should not talk about ideals or hobbies, but should aim for employment and work as soon as possible.
Zhang Xuefeng's remarks seem to be for the good of children, and are even called "the guiding light for children from poor families". However, Zhang Xuefeng ignored a problem, children from poor families need to be employed, and they also need to have their own ideals and hobbies. Some children just love journalism, like to hold microphones, carry cameras, write press releases, why can't they apply. Moreover, is it necessarily difficult to find a job in journalism? At present, all kinds of traditional media still have a large demand for talents, and the vast number of new media have huge jobs.
In other words, which major must be good for employment? Teacher training students are not allowed to work for a few years, and even the job of screwing in the factory can not be found casually.
Looking at Zhang Xuefeng's hysterical roar, the extremely inflammatory language seems to be like a guiding light of the sages, but his tone is full of disdain for students from poor families, which is really difficult to accept. It feels like Chen Hongyou, who was grabbed by a student for the microphone, overly realistic and materialistic.
I firmly believe that the children of ordinary people and the children of poor families need employment and dreams, and only then can they have the opportunity to change themselves. What do you think about this? Welcome to chat. #Headline Creation Challenge#