How big is the difference between mice and ducks? The average person does not refer to a mouse as a duck, which is similar to the ancient deer as a horse, but this is not normal.
On June 3, Jiangxi Industrial Vocational and Technical School, there was an incident in which a student ate a "rat's head" from a meal during a meal, and in the past few days, it has continued to ferment on the Internet, and public opinion has been wave after wave.
The battle between mice and ducks never stops. This is also because of the video taken by a student at the school at the time, from which the swarthy food has teeth and beards, and looks too similar to a mouse's head.
The picture is very similar to a rat's head from any angle, sideways or vertical, and if you eat a rat's head in food, it is a horrible and disgusting thing.
So the video was just exposed, and it soon attracted the attention of public opinion, and everyone was curious to know what that swarthy thing was?
Immediately after the incident, the relevant personnel of the school gathered the student and several classmates to carefully study the duck neck, and they turned it over with chopsticks, intending to let people see that it was not a rat's head at all.
The classmates who posted the video afterwards also spoke out to confirm that it was really a duck's neck, and the school also issued a notice to explain the matter.
Thinking that the matter should have come to an end, the person admitted that it was a duck's neck, and the school also issued a notice proving that there were no rat heads in the food. In the school's view, such a treatment should calm public opinion.
Unexpectedly, one stone stirred up a thousand waves, and the school was so anxious to clarify itself, but it became three hundred taels without silver here.
Many people just want a truth, and this truth cannot be solved by the explanation of the person concerned or the announcement of the school.
The school's handling made people feel that there were some false elements, and some netizens were questioning whether this classmate had received some "hints", so that he later accused the rat of a duck and covered up the truth.
Because this matter is an important matter involving people's livelihood, it belongs to the problem of food safety, and it happens in a vocational school, if the safety of the school canteen is a problem, how can the health of so many students in the school be guaranteed?
According to the thinking of ordinary people, there is a problem with food, it should be solved in the end, what is this food? Is it safe enough? Or the relevant authorities should be asked for testing, rather than looking for the person concerned to confirm that it is a duck's neck through visual inspection.
When I found a problem, I didn't check whether I was doing something inappropriate at the first time, not to check whether the food in the cafeteria was really safe, but to desperately confirm that it was not a rat's head.
Such an upside-down approach must have made netizens doubtful. Moreover, it is not the authoritative quality inspection department that issues the notice, but the school and the person concerned, so it is inevitable that there are some subjective factors.
This is one of the reasons why people have always refused to believe that it is a duck's neck. And the second reason is that people trust their eyes more.
In this era of pictures and truth, videos and pictures have clearly allowed people to see what food looks like, and the masses are more willing to believe that many people's eyes are snowy, and everyone believes more in their own vision.
In this era of declining credibility, people are more willing to trust their eyes and their own judgment, which is the second reason why the incident has not subsided.
The third factor is that later, under the doubts of many parties, the school did find the relevant quality inspection department, but the way the two quality inspection department staff did things made people unconvinced.
How do quality control staff confirm that it's a duck's neck? They make judgments by repeatedly comparing pictures, that is, they do not actually take the food to detect, but rely on their own eyes, rely on their own intuition to judge.
Such a detection method naturally cannot make people believe, and people hope that the relevant departments can take the food into the laboratory, detect and analyze the structure and form of the food, and finally draw a scientific conclusion.
It is precisely because the parties and the relevant departments have handled it inappropriately, and the piece of food really resembles a rat's head, people have been visually impacted and have made an indelible first impression.
To make people believe that it is a duck's neck, it is necessary to show a more sincere attitude and come up with a more scientific way of proof. For example, how to explain those two teeth? How to explain that long beard? Why is a duck's neck so hairy?
These are all questions in the minds of the people. Only by solving these problems one by one and getting a more scientific test report can we calm this storm of public opinion.
Otherwise, it will be difficult for this matter to end perfectly. In the end, it will also affect the credibility of the relevant departments, which must keep pace with the times in handling this issue, seek truth from facts, not cover up, and not confuse the public, otherwise it may trigger a new crisis of trust.