Abstract: In the case of Liu Xuezhou's death by online violence, how many of those online abusers have been investigated? In the "Pink Girl" case, who took the lead in inciting online violence, who paid the price? There is no specific verdict, not even the name of the person who committed the online violence, at most it is just an abstract, mosaic-blurred ID, and abstract anger is as weak as a fist on cotton. Every case of death caused by online violence should not be humbly and tragically named after the victim, it should not be Liu Xuezhou who was killed by online violence, pink girl was killed by online violence, and the name of the online violence death case should be named, so that after being punished by law, it will always be condemned in conscience and always bear the infamy of the online abuser!
Spit on youth production
Poultry and beasts, animals, scum, scum, thugs, murderers, these online abusers, exhaust the most poisonous words, the most ruthless scolding, the heaviest accusations, this abstract anger is the most intense, the more exposed the powerlessness of public opinion against the Internet abusers. Because of powerlessness, I can only use these "cruel words" to express anger, judge abstractly, anger abstractly, and forget abstractly. This kind of abstract anger is the most powerless truth expressed in the most ruthless words. Internet violence is constantly increasing because there is too much abstract anger and too little concrete punishment. Internet violence, often with the most vicious words to the weakest and the biggest weakness of the most ruthless knife, for those who hit the keyboard with too much blood debt on the hands of the Internet violence, can not just abstract anger, need to see concrete anger, fall on specific people!
This time, "the Wuhan campus was hit and killed by the mother of a primary school student who fell to her death", the reason why it touched the public so much is because the superposition of multiple tragedies makes people extremely suffocating and extremely uneasy. A child who happily goes to school is actually run over by a teacher who thinks he loves students the most on the safest campus, and what could be more painful for a mother? She should have received the best care, received the kindest pity, and should have been surrounded by warmth, hugs and love, but she was greeted by online violence with the greatest malice, her figure, makeup, and expression were groundlessly accused, and she was taught "how to be a proper and sad mother". How cruel and malicious is this to exterminate human nature? It cannot be said that this mother died of online violence, but those vicious comments are tantamount to the second merciless crushing of a mother's broken heart, pushing the unloveable mother to an even more loveless despair abyss.
First children, then mothers, such a tragic tragedy cannot be lived by the public! The conscience of heaven and earth, not to let these online abusers with blood on their hands get retribution, the public conscience cannot pass!
Internet abusers have too much blood on their hands, and there are too many things that cannot be passed. Liu Xuezhou, a boy looking for relatives, was killed by online violence, and the public psychology could not pass; Hangzhou girl Zheng Linghua took the graduate admission notice to report to her grandfather in front of the hospital bed, because she suffered large-scale online violence with dyed pink hair, died of depression and suicide, and the public psychology could not get by; In the case of the female doctor in Deyang, the doctor committed suicide after encountering online violence, and the public psychology could not get by. ——But these seemingly "unpassable" things have finally passed, and after the hot spot, few people mention it again, and rarely hear about the follow-up of the Internet abuser being prosecuted and causing extreme comfort.
This is the problem of abstract anger, after the "pink-haired girl" committed suicide by online violence, the crowd was angry for a while, and I couldn't wait to let the Internet abusers leave a stench for 10,000 years, and the whole network "can't live with me". However, relatives or lingering sorrows, others have also sung, abstract anger quickly passes, and the next human life will evoke the angry memory of the previous human life in public opinion (rather than the memory of the judgment). It is conceivable that this fierce crusade against online violence, animals, scum, scum, thugs, murderers, abstract anger, will soon pass. The reason why online violence is endless, the reason why it will not stop at "online violence out of human life", there is no fear, is largely because that kind of anger is abstract, seemingly fierce and violent, but abstract, abstract, can not see specific people by the specific anger of the crit hammer.
In the case of Liu Xuezhou's death by online violence, how many of those online abusers were investigated? In the "Pink Girl" case, who took the lead in inciting online violence, who paid the price? There is no specific verdict, not even the name of the person who committed the online violence, at most it is just an abstract, mosaic-blurred ID, and abstract anger is as weak as a fist on cotton. Every case of death caused by online violence should not be humbly and tragically named after the victim, it should not be Liu Xuezhou who was killed by online violence, pink girl was killed by online violence, and the name of the online violence death case should be named, so that after being punished by law, it will always be condemned in conscience and always bear the infamy of the online abuser!
How do you turn abstract anger into concrete anger? There are several issues that need to be addressed:
First, platforms have unshirkable responsibility for online violence. Internet violence is an innate companion of online platforms, and I have always felt that traffic genes naturally contain online violence, including the stimulation of human evil. Internet violence often corresponds to a wave of topic traffic, the more fierce the debate and tearing, the greater the traffic, the platform is not only not affected by online violence, but can benefit from online violence, which determines that the platform has no driving force for the governance of online violence. After the tragedy, public opinion dealt with a few numbers under pressure (much like a self-protective pin number to calm people and deal with public opinion), and then spread my hands, and I tried my best. Online violence occurs on a specific platform, and the platform has the advantages of algorithms, information, domination, and control, and has the technical ability to stop online violence in the first time, so it must be responsible.
I suggest that the death case of online violence cannot be named after the victim, but the naming and marking method of "platform + perpetrator", for example, a certain platform and a certain online violence case, use a specific mark to teach the platform responsibility.
Second, law enforcers and regulators must have positive actions, and the anger of public opinion is only abstract anger, and the anger of law enforcers will point to concrete. As netizens asked, these online abusers are actually very chicken thieves, and they know very well who can scold and who cannot offend casually. They know that ordinary victims are the easiest to scold, attack and ridicule casually: they are either immersed in grief and unable to fight back, or psychologically fragile and unable to cope, ordinary people's rights protection costs are huge, and this kind of thing is ignored without telling. Countless real-life cases are much more effective than abstract anger, and they know too well when they will immediately be "detained on the ground, detained, accused and punished", and when they will be unscathed.
We cannot convey the erroneous expectation that "some cannot be bullied, some can be bullied" to online abusers, everyone is equal before the law, and no one can abuse online violence. Take out the kind of vigorous and mobile law enforcement to deal with these online violence cases against civilians. Is it so difficult to respond to the public's call to investigate a few people according to law, quickly give feedback, and send a blue-background notification? Can such a tragic case be passed by law enforcement?