Hello fellow car elders, I am the Phantom Tanker Lightning who has high blood pressure every day. This week, WG launched the S-series twin-barreled 703 Project II., compared to the World of Tanks plus subscription tank TS-54, many commanders are curious about the performance of these two two-barreled vehicles. Today, the editor will bring the comparative analysis of TS-54 and 703 to give commanders a clear answer.
Before starting this article, I would like to express my special thanks to the player ID "such a name Thai Pants Hot" for its support and outstanding contribution.
Wise eyes×2
As a product of the heyday of WG's "Void Car Building", Project 703 II is undoubtedly a typical example of the era of data exceeding standards - ultra-high protection capabilities, out-of-line fire coefficients and so on. Its contemporaries, PM35/46, Chadillan Tempest, etc., all heralded the heyday of the Class 8 gold coin car. It is also that unbearable past that completely squeezed the level 8 silver coin car that adhered to its duties off the stage of history, and the level 8 room officially became a show for gold coin cars and entertainment cars.
Wise eyes×4
And the TS-54 was born at the end of the 8th Golden Age. For a long time, its strength has not been favored by the commanders. It was even predicted that it would usher in a "lose-all" fate like WZ-113-II. Coincidentally, it is bound to the newborn WOTplus, so that more captains have the opportunity to contact and experience it. And its low practice threshold and acquisition cost, just the right strength and the attributes of the "wheelchair car" also make it reborn from the shadow of the "failed chariot".
Firepower
Project 703 II is equipped with a group of 122mD-25E-A2 guns, this tank gun has a qualified and useful 221APCR/270HEAT shell combination, 0.44 accuracy, 3.5 seconds aiming time and DPM in the early 2000s are also the normal level of the 8th level D-25T series, but its triple expansion coefficient is only 0.12/0.12/0.06, which is simply amazing. The main positioning of Project 703 II is urban expansion and hand-to-hand combat. This gives it an unparalleled firing speed among the 122-gun HTs, which is the source of the 703 Project II's strong endurance.
7032 quick shot
The TS-54 is equipped with a set of 94mm GBR double-barreled tank guns (such a strange caliber like a Y-series car), with an average damage of 280 points, a depth of 218/252, relying on a better AP/APCR ammunition combination, the armor-piercing ability is basically the same as that of the 703 Project II. Compared to the 703 "rough and brutal" firepower characteristics. The TS-54 is superior in terms of balance and stability. Although the average damage is slightly lower, the higher DPM of just over 6 seconds of reload makes it more flexible than the 703, and there are more opportunities and space for choice on the battlefield.
TS54 when single-engine hit
At the level of the salvo, the salvo of Project 703 II., although highly deterrent, requires 3 seconds of preparation time, which is not long but not short. Many times a salvo is missed because of a difference of 1 second or a few tenths of a second. The 4-second lock-up time after the salvo allows the commanders to consider the risk and reward before the salvo.
The 7032 salvo failed, missed opportunities
The deterrent of a salvo is indeed terrifying
The TS-54 only needs two seconds of "charge" to quickly fire a salvo of shells, although the salvo damage of only 560 points is far less than the 703II's nearly 800 points of average damage. But better gun control and faster salvo readiness/post-salvo lock time allowed commanders to fire salvos more "unbridled" (DPM winning theory), and the TS-54's salvo felt even better than the 703.
A quick volley is fired in 2 seconds
Armored game
Although in terms of firepower, Project 703 II and TS-54 can be regarded as "rulers are short and inches are long", and they are tied. But in terms of protection capabilities, the TS-54 can only bow down. In the case of equivalent armor thickness of the hull weakness, Project 703 II not only has a smaller area. The 140mm homogeneous steel head armor raised the penetration thickness to 250+mm, while the side armor was the 703II's high thickness + clearance "out" TS-54.
TS-54 What do you compare with me
The turret integral armor TS-54 is not much different from Project 703 II. However, the TS-54 had a small rangefinder weakness on each side of the turret, which undoubtedly weakened the TS-54's ability to withstand pressure in close combat. Therefore, the TS-54 lost the ability to "dominate" the top selling position like the 703 Project II, and more often it had to quickly expand and expand like the "Renegade" and the T-832, and use operations to fill the shortcomings of survival.
Failure! An absolute failure
Take a round back
Left 7032 right TS54
In terms of maneuverability, although the top speed of TS-54 and 703 Project II is around 40, the TS-54 has better track adaptability and a better thrust-to-weight ratio, and when the 703 Project II just started to 11 unit power, the TS-54 may have approached reaching speed under the thrust-to-weight ratio of 16. And the TS-30+ spinning speed TS-54 is also more flexible (this is perhaps a "compensation" for the lack of armor).
In terms of field of view and concealment coefficient, TS-54 is the complete explosion of Project 703 Type II. As the inheritor of the S series "blind", the 703's field of view is only a terrifying 350m, which is a world away from the TS-54's 380m field of view of the MT. With the advantage of vision, the TS-54 can not only mix a lot of lighting assistance on the front line, but also improve the control field and survivability in disguise.
summary
To sum up, in absolute strength, the Type 703 Project II with higher gun damage and better armor clearly prevails - that is, within a large threshold, among players of comparable technical level, it is relatively inferior to drive the TS-54 to the 703 Project II. However, the "line breaker" does not apply to all tanks, as an 8 gold HT with vision and output while taking into account mobility. The TS-54 is clearly capable of many things that the Type 703 II cannot. For most commanders, the 703 Project II is obviously more powerful, and in the hands of commanders who are more skilled and willing to pay more training costs, the TS-54 can burst out much more valuable value than the average HT.
Here is the tank space station, the tank public number that always thinks about the player. It's not easy to be original, if you like our article, please also forward and share publicity, so that more commanders can return to our own position. Commanders are also welcome to comment and discuss with the editor below. Finally, I wish all commanders to penetrate the artillery and high wounds of the artillery!