In response to the sudden outbreak of "chaos" in the African country of Sudan, we in China announced a large-scale evacuation plan at the first time, and after several days of efforts, the Chinese that should be withdrawn in Sudan were basically withdrawn. This attitude of valuing overseas travelers is in stark contrast to the U.S. government. As the recent chaos in Sudan intensified, the White House also implemented a plan to evacuate overseas Chinese, but only more than 100 diplomats were evacuated, and as of the end of April, 16,000 Americans were still stranded in Sudan.
After seeing this situation, we can't help but ask those 1450 people on the island of Taiwan who are sour to their own people, Chinese mainland "wolves" have gone to Sudan to safely bring out their compatriots, but where did Captain America, who is a god in your heart, run? Although both "Wolf Warrior" and Captain America are just a joke, what is actually reflected behind this is indeed the attitude of China and the United States towards overseas travelers. China is doing everything possible to ensure the life, property and safety of foreigners at sea. In the United States, on the other hand, the White House is completely uncomfortable, which has led to the fact that American citizens can now only ask for their own blessings.
Of course, we can't completely deny the White House's efforts to keep American citizens safe. Generally speaking, when a country is at war, other countries want to protect the safety of their own citizens, one is to use various means of transportation through direct intervention to bring overseas citizens back home. Usually, this method requires the cooperation of armed forces, after all, there is a war, the surrounding environment is definitely not safe, in this case, there is an army responsible for evacuation, in order to ensure more security.
For example, from the videos posted on the Internet, it is not difficult to see that the current environment in Sudan is very bad, and even the sound of gunfire can be heard near the Chinese Embassy in Sudan. Therefore, China chose to use warships this time and berth directly at foreign ports to carry out evacuation missions. It turns out that such an option is very effective, and the life, property and safety of foreigners at sea are guaranteed to the greatest extent.
The second approach is to mediate a truce to open a humanitarian passage for its own citizens and then let them return home on their own, which is presumably the strategy used by the US government this time. This approach is indeed very suitable for the United States, after all, there are too many and mixed American expatriates in Sudan, and after the scale exceeds the level of 10,000 people, it is unrealistic to think about transferring them by a few planes or a few buses. For this reason, the second approach is indeed quite suitable for the United States, but the actual situation is often unexpected, with the intervention of many countries, although Sudan has achieved a ceasefire in words, it can be done every day in action, and the final result is that the White House has played badly this time. However, China has now proved that the first approach is still very effective, so here is a suggestion that Biden can learn from our Chinese approach and take some responsibility for his own people.