As I said, the public opinion trend of "making a fuss" in your circle is really rising and falling!
No, the "spiritual man" controversy caused by Bailu's ancient remarks has just come to an end, and a pair of jeans has stirred up a new wave of public opinion.
Here's what happened, in the video of Gulinaza going to the Universal Cinema and taking photos on the street, the jeans shaped like "underwear exposed" at the waist were particularly eye-catching, which caused a wave of widespread heated discussion, and the onlookers quickly stood in two teams.
There are roughly two reasons for not being accustomed to the party:
1. Vulgar, indecent, sexually suggestive, offensive, as a public figure should not be dressed like this, may bring bad children;
2. Simply feel bad, don't say that you don't have Naza's figure, even if you have, you won't wear it that way.
There are also many people who think it's okay: it's trendy and spicy, and beautiful women can wear it as they want, without the need for others' guidance.
As an ordinary person who gradually pursues simplicity and comfort in dressing and is more and more unrelated to fashion, to be honest, the first time I saw the photo of Naza wearing these pants, I did frown slightly and felt some aesthetic subversion. But fortunately, after a little thought, I quickly calmed my mood, also for two reasons:
1. Isn't it a norm that ordinary people can't understand this kind of thing?
Ordinary styles embedded in monotonous busy life, that can still be called fashion? That's just a practical outfit. Isn't it the core essence of fashion to be unconventional, challenge the visual comfort zone, and blindly pursue ornamental value regardless of practicality?
2. Maybe I'm old.
Just as my parents and grandfathers couldn't understand ripped jeans, maybe I'm over thirty years old and can't understand youth fashion. But for another part of the people, the "weirdness" in my eyes is precisely the extremely natural and extremely good-looking style and shape.
I need to accept the difference in this world and the fact that I have been left to the edge by the fashion circle and the spiritual little sister circle. It doesn't matter if you live until one day to become the so-called "old-fashioned", just accept it.
After doing such psychological construction, you can look at these pants and this style of dressing more calmly, without adding disgust and the urge to correct it on the basis of dislike, and truly achieve "she wears hers, I say mine, respect, blessing, do not interfere with each other", after all, aesthetics will always vary greatly according to age, region, circle, and education method.
Everyone has the freedom to dress, but at the same time, everyone has freedom of speech, and the two should coexist, not be a "you die, I live" relationship.
As for vulgarity and indecency, it is somewhat heavy.
Whether you dress appropriately depends on the occasion. Going to Universal Studios, so it doesn't hurt to dress casually and casually, right? And her identity is a female star, not a female teacher, she is engaged in the entertainment industry, and she should not have to bear the heavy responsibility of educating the public. If a child is taken badly, aren't parents and teachers more responsible? Why do you want to let the star be the back pot man?
Secondly, there is no doubt that the group of female celebrities usually dresses a little more boldly. This is because one of the essential meanings of the existence of celebrities is to provide sexual fantasies, that is, as distant and shining containers to carry the public's imagination of a beautiful partner.
Male celebrities have to wear a low cut to concerts, just to make themselves look more sexy, so that female fans can scream for it! Can you simply and crudely interpret it as vulgar?
As long as it is moderate, such occupations and scenes are a very reasonable and even necessary existence, and the impulses and imaginations in people's hearts need a normal cathartic channel to hedge against the poverty, monotony and cruelty of daily life.
Influenced by this professional atmosphere, celebrities will naturally choose styles that are bright enough and highlight their sexual charm to decorate their golden bodies as perfect containers. This is similar to doctors wearing white coats and firefighters wearing uniforms, which is a necessary packaging to prove one's professionalism, but sometimes it is intentional (such as specially prepared for a dinner party), and sometimes it is a subconscious choice (such as private clothing).
In terms of boldness, different cultural atmospheres will have different states of presentation, such as in Europe and the United States, the degree to which male and female stars "let go of themselves" in their outfits is called a "stunned old antique": underwear exposed, Justin Bieber has already demonstrated it himself; Kendou also used to wear black silk directly on the outside of his underwear to go out on the street to restore the way he wore on the runway.
As well as in the early years of the Hong Kong circle, Lin Qingxia's sister used to wear a bikini-style white underwear under a denim jacket when she was young, talking and laughing freely, casually not pretentious, and interpreting the cool and hot girl style to the fullest.
You may say that Sister Qingxia looks good in such a dress, I simply think Naza's bizarre and weird pants are ugly.
Yes, but if you like it or not, you don't have to buckle the hats of "vulgar", "dusty", "unruly", "uncivilized" and "unethical women", right? Respecting a person's dressing habits is respecting the culture behind him and his perspective on the world.
For thousands of years, women's bodies have withstood too harsh scrutiny and fiddling, and now it's 2023, so it's better to be tolerant and relaxed, right? Everything rises to a moral height, which is quite tired and uncreative.
What do you think? Speak up in the comments section!