Since the release of ChatGPT, there has been an endless stream of opinions advocating and criticizing it, and even many governments and companies have rejected him, which did not follow Italy's announcement of the ban on ChatGPT, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries and Samsung, SoftBank and other companies have also begun to investigate or take measures to restrict the use of the software. So why are ChatGPT reviews so polarized?
First of all, we need to know what is ChatGPT, ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence technology-driven natural language processing tool newly launched by the American artificial intelligence research laboratory OpenAI, using the Transformer neural network architecture. It is also GPT-3.5 architecture, which is a model for processing sequence data, with language understanding and text generation capabilities, especially it will train the model by connecting a large number of databases, which contain real-world content, so that ChatGPT has the ability to know astronomy and geography, and can interact according to the context of the chat, so as to communicate with the chat scene almost no different from real humans. ChatGPT is not only a chatbot, but also can write emails, video scripts, copywriting, translation, code and other tasks.
The point of the previous paragraph is that it is a database-based natural language processing tool. In this regard, I consulted several industry gods at the technical entry level, which probably means that unlike the keyword search of traditional search, ChatGPT is a collection of information retrieval, aggregation and combing. But ChatGPT is still a collector of information, not a creator of real information. And where and how this information is obtained, as well as storage and read permissions, I think is the most important reason for the concerns of many governments and organizations. After all, now Eagle Sauce leads his general lackeys to shout information security every day to sanction the rising rabbit!
ChatGPT breaks the cognitive limits of many people and is considered by many to be the breakthrough point of the next generation of technology, even Bill Gates admits: the significance of the emergence of ChatGPT is no less than the birth of the Internet and personal computers. How new technologies are applied to the development of countries, industries and human beings is what everyone should care about, and it is also a new opportunity for everyone to surpass themselves. Just like new energy vehicles are to the Chinese automotive industry.
ChatGPT is an extension of human ability, but there is too much uncertainty brought by this thing, how to formulate rules, laws and other prudent preventive measures, so that its development under supervision is also necessary. And we are not raising cheats, raising a bunch of crazy scientists? People want to be associated with reason, not with madmen. In fact, as soon as the concept of AI came out, some people commented on Asimov's three laws of robotics: the three laws of robotics are just wishful thinking on the part of humans, and AI may not abide by it!
In short, everything is a double-edged sword, ChatGPT is no exception, the key is not to choke on food!