Actor Jang Dong-yoon, who is in the midst of controversy over the distortion of the history of the SBS walrus drama "Chosun Gumasa," apologized himself. Could his apology for "right-handed" move the viewer's mind?
The SBS moonfire drama "North Korean Exorcist" has become controversial because of distorting history, and actor Jang Dong-yun came forward to apologize. "I'm too ignorant." Can this apology save the audience's hearts?
On July 27, Jang dong-yoon wrote on Instagram of his company Dongyi Company: 'Hello actor Jang Dong-yoon. I was troubled a lot. I write in the hope that even if I am not satisfied with the many people who are waiting for my thoughts and positions as one of the leading stars in the Chosun Gumasa, I will give a sincere and authentic answer.'
On the 27th, Zhang Dongrun posted a long article on the INS account of the agency company and said: "Hello everyone, I am actor Zhang Dongrun. I was agonized for a long time. A lot of friends are waiting for my response as one of the stars of "The Korean Exorcist." Although my answer may not be satisfactory to everyone, I also wrote this passage with sincerity. ”
After the controversy over the distortion of the history of the "Chosun Gumasa", the actors also returned to the arrow of condemnation. In particular, Jang Dong-yoon, who played the role of Chongnyeong Daegu, appeared in a number of scenes that led to the viewer's point and found himself at the center of controversy. The chinese-style controversy that was ignited in the process of serving food to Father John, a foreign Kuma priest, in a parasitic house, and the demeaning controversy in which he told an escort that a wooden man had fled in parasitizing. He was also criticized for his remarks at the production presentation, saying, "I thought it was an extraordinary and uncommon opportunity because it was not a commonly accessible material."
After "The Korean Exorcist" fell into controversy because of its distorted history, the main actors of the drama were also attacked by netizens. In particular, most of the scenes pointed out by the audience that there were problems had the figure of Zhang Dongrun, who played the role of Zhongning Dajun, which also led to Zhang Dongrun being in the center of the controversy. The controversy over the Chinese style when entertaining the exorcist Priest John at dinner in the brothel shop, and the controversy of demeaning the ancestors such as telling the guards that Taizu Li Chenggui was addicted to prostitutes and escaping were all criticized by the audience. Even at the production conference, he said, "Because it's not a common subject, I think it's a very rare opportunity." , also by netizens attacked.
The situation has even occurred in the event of colostrum being abolished. Jang said, 'Once there's no excuse. I'm very sorry. I wasn't fully aware that this would be such a problem. It was because I was unsobsumed and rested. I only looked at the work from the perspective of the actor who plays the creation. I overlooked the areas that should be viewed socially and in a way. It's a big mistake,' he said, revealing his reflection.
"North Korean Exorcist" has been confirmed to be withdrawn. Zhang Dongrun wrote: "First of all, I have nothing to defend me. I'm really sorry. I didn't realize that this work would cause such a big problem. The reason for this is that I am too ignorant and too comfortable. I only look at the work from the standpoint of a performer, but ignore the part that should be examined from a social perspective with a keen eye. I made a big mistake. ”
'Just being able to be with a respected director and great seniors and fellow actors didn't make me have a reason to do this. For me, I believed it was the best option when considering a number of things within limited options. As I mentioned earlier, this is also because I was stupid," he said, pleading, "But if you think about it, I'd like to take this incident to your heart and show you how good it is as a mature actor."
"Just being able to work with directors and great actors that I respect very much makes me want to turn down this work." I had always thought that out of the limited options, I had deliberately made the best option. As mentioned earlier, it's all because of my stupidity. ”
Jang Dong-yoon was the first actor to open his mouth. I'm interested to see if Jang Dong-yoon, who has walked the flower path since his debut, will be able to overcome this controversy and be forgiven by viewers.
Among the actors of "The Korean Exorcist", Jang Dong-yun was the first to respond. Since his debut, he has always had a smooth road, can he overcome this difficulty and win the forgiveness of the audience?
Here is the full text of Jang Dong-yoon's apology.
The following is the full text of Zhang Dongrun's apology statement
Hello, actor Jang Dong-yoon. I was troubled a lot. I write in hopes that honest and authentic answers will be given, even if I am not satisfied with the many people who are waiting with frustration for my thoughts and positions as one of the leading stars in the Chosun Gumasa Temple.
Hello everyone, I am actor Zhang Dongrun. I was agonized for a long time. A lot of friends are waiting for my response as one of the stars of "The Korean Exorcist." Although my answer may not be satisfactory to everyone, I also wrote this passage with sincerity.
Once there is no excuse. I'm very sorry. I wasn't fully aware that this would be such a problem. It was because I was unsobsumed and rested. I only looked at the work from the perspective of the actor who plays the creation. I overlooked the areas that should be looked at socially sharply. It's a big mistake.
First of all, I have nothing to defend. I'm really sorry. I didn't realize that this work would cause such a big problem. The reason for this is that I am too ignorant and too comfortable. I only look at the work from the standpoint of a performer, but ignore the part that should be examined from a social perspective with a keen eye. I made a big mistake.
There was no reason for me to do this just by being able to be with a respected director and a great senior and fellow actors. For me, I believed it was the best option when considering a number of things within limited options. I mentioned earlier, this is also because I was foolish.
Just being able to work with directors and good actors that I respect very much makes me not want to turn down this work. I had always thought that out of the limited options, I had deliberately made the best option. As mentioned earlier, it's all because of my stupidity.
I tried to cultivate myself thoroughly in the belief that individuals can always live in good faith without moral flaws. However, there is an embarrassing and embarrassing thing that happens in the part related to the work, and I reflect a lot.
I've always felt that as long as a person doesn't make a mistake on the moral level, he can be a decent person. It is because of this thought that I have always restrained myself. But when something really happened at work that made me feel ashamed, I also began to reflect on myself.
I know I can work with the love and attention of the public. So I will humbly accept this article, even if you ask me to make excuses that are different from my intentions. I didn't want to be an emotional appeal or a sympathetic post, but I'm sorry to say that I'm sorry that it was because I expressed my heart with authenticity. However, if you think about it, I'd like to take this incident to my heart and show you how good it is as a mature actor.
I can now experience first-hand that it is precisely because people love and care about me that I have the opportunity to work. So even if people think that this text is my defense for themselves, I will accept it calmly. I also don't want this article to be a text that I complain about or sympathize with. But because I wanted to express my true feelings so much, the final article looked a bit like I was complaining or winning sympathy. I can only apologize to everyone repeatedly. If you are willing to forgive me this time, I will definitely take this matter to heart and try to show everyone my mature side as an actor.
Today's Vocabulary:
게재하다 [he verb] published, issued, published, published
화살 [noun] arrow, arrow
불거지다 [automatic word] exposed, highlighted, highlighted
예리하다 [adjective] astute, sharp
마다하다 [his verb] prevarication, refusal, refusal, unwillingness
Sentence syntax:
- Even if
"겠" cannot be preceded by it. Represents a hypothetical concession. as:
Even if it's scary, I won't detect my eyes.
Even if I was afraid, I wouldn't close my eyes.
Be calm no matter what.
Whatever happens, be calm.
Even if they went, the work would not be done.
Even if they go, the work will not be finished.
No matter how difficult it may be, it must be completed.
No matter how hard it is, it must be done.
After the final word ending "다", "치더라도", "손치더라도", which indicates concessions, equivalent to the Chinese "even if it is... also...". as:
Even if you're sick, you should be careful.
Even if you are well, you must be careful.
Even if you have a lot of things, you shouldn't waste them.
Even if there are many things, they cannot be wasted.
- Because
It is followed by a body word (name, number, generation) to indicate the causal relationship before and after. If you want to connect with the predicate (verb, shape), you need to add an 기 after the predicate to convert the predicate into a noun component. This sentence pattern is more indicative of its reason or cause than "아/어서".
I'm crazy about my girlfriend.
I'm going crazy because of my girlfriend.
I don't have anyone at school because it's a weekend.
Because it was a weekend, there was no one at school.
I can't travel because I work part-time.
I can't travel because I work part-time.
I can't eat because I don't have any money.
Because I don't have money, I can't eat.