What is the difference between a baby who has been "forbidden to eat sugar" and a baby who has not been restricted since childhood? The difference of 3 points is significant
In recent years, more and more parents have begun to pay attention to their children's dietary health, especially for sugar intake, many parents will choose to prohibit their children from eating sugar or limit sugar intake. However, there are also some parents who choose not to limit their child's sugar intake, believing that it will make their child happier. So, what is the difference between a baby who has been "forbidden to eat sugar" and a baby who has not been restricted since childhood? This article will explore this topic from the aspects of physical health, taste preferences, and psychology!
In good shape
First of all, from the perspective of physical health, children who are "forbidden to eat sugar" from an early age tend to have better physical health when they grow up. Studies have shown that excessive sugar intake increases the risk of chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and high blood pressure. Children who are forbidden to eat sugar from an early age have better physical health and fewer of the above diseases than those who consume a lot of sugar from an early age. In addition, because excess sugar can affect the function of the immune system, children who are banned from eating sugar from an early age also have relatively stronger immunity and are less likely to get sick.
Taste preferences
Secondly, from the perspective of taste preferences, children who are "forbidden to eat sugar" often do not like to eat too sweet foods when they grow up, and relatively prefer light foods. Children who are not restricted prefer to eat sweets, on the contrary. This is also because the taste formation period in childhood is more important, if the child eats too much sugar during this period, it will cause the taste to develop in the direction of sweetness, and the child who prohibits eating sugar is relatively avoided this situation.
Children who are "forbidden to eat sugar" from an early age tend to be more inclined to reject sweets in adulthood. This is because in childhood he may see sugar as a taboo and develop feelings of disgust. This emotion may persist with age and is not easily changed in adulthood. Therefore, such children tend to be more resistant when faced with candy.
Second, children who are "forbidden to eat sugar" from an early age tend to have healthier living habits. Because parents usually pay more attention to the healthy diet of their children and choose to provide healthy foods for their children. This can also help children develop healthy eating habits and lifestyle habits. At the same time, such children tend to be more able to control their appetite and are less likely to overeat candy.
Finally, unrestricted children tend to have a more inclined to eat sweets as adults. Because they have been allowed to eat sugar since childhood, there will be a greater interest in sweets. This behavior may continue with age and is not easily changed in adulthood. In addition, unrestricted children tend to be more prone to excessive candy consumption, which can lead to obesity and other health problems.
In summary, although banning children from eating sugar can avoid excessive candy consumption to some extent, it can also have a negative impact on children's sweet preferences and eating habits. Therefore, it is recommended that parents should be moderate when choosing candy for their children, and do not have to be too restrictive.