laitimes

Kindergarten children wear kimonos for June Day? One phrase "malicious editing" is probably not enough

author:Hassle-free drawing board UL

Recently, a video of Nanjing kindergarten children wearing kimonos for Children's Day became popular.

In the video, a group of children dressed in various kimonos bounce on stage, apparently celebrating Children's Day. Nanjing, kimono, children, these elements pile up and make people angry.

Subsequently, the Nanjing Jiangning District Education Bureau responded that the online video was maliciously produced and edited, and the kindergarten did not conduct any online video-related activities on June 1. The video was not released on the 1st of the filming, and the public security organs are participating in the investigation.

According to the staff, the kindergarten had previously conducted a rehearsal with the theme of "seeing the world through children's eyes", in which the children dressed in national costumes of various countries happened to be photographed by passers-by. It. Rehearse. The rehearsal event did not meet the requirements, was cancelled on the same day, and has not been held since.

It's hard to understand because the response is spinning. The video may be fake, but the performance of kindergarten children in kimonos is real.

That is, the kindergarten prepared an activity for children to wear kimono, but failed due to violations.

The next question is, what is the focus of the audience? Kimono, not June 1st. So it doesn't matter when the video was filmed, what matters is why the kindergarten is preparing for such an event.

So the reaction seems a bit vague. Netizens do not pay attention to whether the video is maliciously edited, what they really care about is the intentions of the kindergarten.

Kindergarten children wear kimonos for June Day? One phrase "malicious editing" is probably not enough

It is understood that the kindergarten where the incident occurred is Nanjing Borui Swan Lake Kindergarten. According to public information, the legal representative of the kindergarten is Lu Fang. Founded on January 10, 2016, with a registered capital of 600,000 yuan. The address is in Shangyuan Street, Jiangning District, and the business scope includes 3-6 years old early childhood education.

Since it is an event of social concern, once it occurs, comprehensive measures must be taken. "Malicious editing" may not be enough. Just like elementary school textbooks, we need to thoroughly investigate why. Illustrate events.

Many people resent the primary school textbook incident not because they were afraid that these toxic textbooks would seriously harm children, but because insiders ignored education. Vegetarianism is not a great sin, but doing nothing is a sin.

As for the kimono incident in the kindergarten, I think it was not someone who deliberately went undercover to make the atmosphere worse. After sitting in a comfortable position for a long time, you will forget your troubles; If you live in a comfortable place for a long time, you will forget the painful past.

Recently, a woman in Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province posted that she was fired from the company for repeatedly going to her aunt's toilet.

The woman said that when she came to her aunt's house, she often had to change sanitary napkins, and the leaders often couldn't find her. The real reason for the layoffs is that the company needs to integrate the two brands and don't need as many people.

According to the company, the employee liked to move and could not find anyone more than once or twice. After comprehensive assessment, she was not suitable to work in the company and was dismissed.

The company suggests that if a woman is not satisfied with the outcome of the dismissal, she can apply for arbitration. The woman is currently applying for arbitration.

Kindergarten children wear kimonos for June Day? One phrase "malicious editing" is probably not enough

After the news broke, public opinion reversed.

At first, most netizens sided with women, thinking that it was too strange for the company to fire employees and deprive people of their right to life.

Recently, more and more netizens are reluctant to believe in small essays and are more inclined to support the company's approach. If you are not satisfied, you can apply for arbitration instead of posting a small article online to gain sympathy. Guide public opinion.

The subtle shift in public opinion is mainly due to the fact that the headlines appear a little provocative, "I was fired for not meeting the requirements", but the hidden feelings are completely different.

The former focuses on women's topics, while the latter focuses on the essence of events. The woman's claim to have been fired for going to the toilet too many times at her aunt's house was based on chat records with internal employees and her own subjective opinion.

Summary: Hefei Urban Management Bureau responded to "Audi A6 driving law enforcement": roadside vendors repeatedly warned and refused to change, worried that it was not safe to escape!

Recently, a video about chengguan law enforcement has attracted public attention.

The location of the incident was the south gate of Singapore Garden City, Changjiang West Road, Hefei, Anhui Province. On the evening of May 31, a woman holds her child and sets up a roadside stall. Sundries such as coal stoves are moved to the side of the road.

This act caused dissatisfaction among those around him. The staff asked rhetorically: Is Volkswagen the best? The staff said: You don't even understand the cause and effect of the matter, what do you care?

There are some controversies: 1. The staff drives the Audi A6 for law enforcement, private car official business; 2. Some staff do not wear uniforms; 3. Roadside stove; proximity to people;

The following is the final response of the official department: First, the precedent of the incident is that the road section of the incident received a number of complaints about occupying the road and discouraged it many times. We provided other free business outlets for hawkers in the precinct, but after repeated warnings, the chengguan launched a law enforcement operation on the evening of May 31.

Secondly, the reason why I drove my own car was because the road section where the incident occurred was heavily trafficked and the law enforcement vehicles were more conspicuous. The hawkers saw the stalls leaving in a hurry, fearing that there would be a safety hazard. It was a food stall, so I drove my own car. Private use of public cars is absolutely not allowed, and private use of private cars is permitted.

Why are only tricycles taken away and other daily necessities moved to the side of the road unattended? These foods cannot be stored for long periods of time and are lost once broken.

Kindergarten children wear kimonos for June Day? One phrase "malicious editing" is probably not enough

The local urban management department said that vendors can come to the unit to write a letter of guarantee to claim the vehicle without paying the fine. If you continue to operate illegally in the future, you will be punished.