Regarding the entrance examination, I look at Mr. Luo Xiang's real question

Text/Rokushen Leilei

One

Teacher Luo Xiang said something about the public examination, which also caused a small storm.

I haven't watched hot news for a long time, or because Absalom posted an article, I knew that there was such a thing.

To the effect that Luo Xiang believes that "he is responsible for his own guilt", and his children cannot decide whether their parents make mistakes or not, and they feel that they should not take the examination of the three generations of public affairs and check their parents.

Of course, this caused many netizens to be unhappy. On some online platforms, this is a one-sided scolding, and some say that they have since lost their powder.

I saw the comment saying: "Since your family has a stain, there are so many roads, will you die if you don't take the guild?" ”

Some people also commented under Absalom's article: Why do you seize the opportunity of our innocent family with your tainted family? Is this fair? Being able to get admitted shows that you are not bad in other positions, so many positions, why do you stare at civil servants?

The above messages are relatively civilized.

Let's tell you an interesting story about your real experience.

When I was a journalist a few years ago, there was an incident that was also published in the press, and everyone was hotly discussing whether a person who had been punished himself could take the public examination. I also followed up with the interviews.

And now everyone is hotly discussing whether a person can be punished and whether his children can take the public examination. And, also one-sided.

It's true that the topic never changes, and the angle is unpredictable.

Two

Tell the truth. Where is Luo Xiang's little so-called "rollover"?

In a word, good people always die of nosy, and bad people always die of unequal sharing of the spoils.

Anyway, this is the deepest experience I can get from looking at history.

Mr. Luo's words themselves are not the biggest problem, honestly speaking, I think it can still be discussed. His real biggest problem is being nosy.

Well, the Internet, messy, just discuss some fake problems, why try to discuss the real problem? Let's discuss whether it is okay to catch giant pandas for a few years?

It's like the Quanzhen faction has a forum where everyone discusses why my martial arts teaching is so high, how my sect repelled Prince Huodu, and how we cultivated the great hero Guo Jing. But someone actually seriously threw out the topic:

"Should we have expelled Yang Guo at that time?"

This is embarrassing, isn't this looking for trouble? Whether you say yes or no, discussing this in itself is not pleasant.

The party Zhao Zhijing was afraid that the first one would not do it: What do you mean? What benefits did Yang Guo give you? Sent you to carve?

And this problem has nothing to do with Luo Xiang himself. Teacher Luo Xiang himself did not take the public examination. It is impossible to have such a scene, someone sneakily called Teacher Luo and said: "Hello Teacher Luo, I am a corrupt official, I called you inside, my child wants to take the public examination, you have a lot of influence, help me say a few words on the Internet, and when I come out, dig up corrupt money to transfer money to you..."

Since it has nothing to do, what to do with it, in the words of the basketball circle, is life unsatisfactory?

Teacher Luo has so many fans, yes, but many of them come to see "Zhang San", an extrajudicial maniac, to see how to punish prostitutes and miss delinquents, not to listen to the real problems, not to seek views on the real problems in the world.

Zi Yu: Do not talk with words, gaffes. Lu Xun also quoted this sentence. In my opinion, this is the real problem of Mr. Luo's words.

It is still recommended to only talk about Zhang San, an extrajudicial maniac, and talk about how many years Zhang San will be sentenced to stealing giant pandas, which is very good.

Three

As for what Teacher Luo said, let's talk about it.

The so-called "guilt is at your own risk", even if the children of tainted parents should be able to take the public examination, why is it easy to make people shout "powder"?

Because this involves a problem of the cognitive habits of the Internet public. People on the Internet are generally like this, who you speak for, and he thinks you are with someone.

When you speak for a reporter, you think you and the journalist are in the same group; When you speak for an athlete with a bad grade, you think you and the athlete are in the same group; When you speak for an artist, you think you are in a gang with a bad artist; When you speak for your boss, you think you're in a gang with your bosses.

They don't know the difference: Do you speak for rights or privileges? The two are not the same at all.

In fact, everyone who speaks for rights and interests, whether the other party is rich or poor, in the final analysis, speaks for the poor and suffering. Because since ancient times, the most incapable of protecting their own rights and interests in the world is the poor and suffering.

If even Zhao Zhijing was beaten, then Xiao Yang Guo would definitely be beaten even more. Doraemon has seen it, Fat Tiger can smoke Xiaofu casually, and he can smoke Nobita casually. This truth is not difficult to understand, you think, you think carefully.

Many people are simple-minded and wishful thinking. They hope that all the rules and regulations in this world only protect themselves, and they must not let another person in.

If you are a poor and miserable person, you hope that the world will only create one rule to protect the poor and miserable, and do not let in the well-off; The well-off hope to create only one rule, only protect the well-off and below, and not let a middle class in; The middle class also wants to create only one rule, protect the middle class well, and not let a rich man in...

Is it possible? There are no such rules. You can only set a uniform rule: Fat Tiger can't beat people indiscriminately, whether it is to Xiaofu or Nobita. This rule is called the rule of law.

If poor people do not want the rule of law, but want to clean up their unhappy people, do you think they will take advantage in the end?

Four

On the Internet, everyone has a different division of labor.

Some people are responsible for angry words: this, this, such are all shot! This way, this, such are all death! Exams are not allowed in this way, this, and this!

Angry words are not necessarily wrong, but after all, there must be some people, their role is the gatekeeper, such as Luo Xiang, they also have angry words, it is difficult to do it in private occasionally have foul words, but they can't say, but have to say it from a professional point of view, have to say it through the brain, have to collect more information to say, have to say from the real possible consequences.

Angry talk is cool for a while, but if you all say angry words, you are very afraid.

Jin Yong wrote a lot about the Yuan Dynasty. It's like someone in the Yuan Dynasty said angry words:

"The Han people have no help in the country, they should be empty, kill them all, and take all their land for us to graze!"

There was applause. Scary no?

Fortunately, there are people like Yelu Chucai, who said against the wind why kill all the Han people? Is it bad to keep taxes? Isn't it better than grazing?

Jeruch is the gatekeeper.

As I said before, the angry words are not necessarily all wrong, and the words of the gatekeeper are not necessarily all correct. But the problem is, you have to have a gatekeeper, you can't do without it.

Think about what Absalom said, if it is just the children of some "tainted families" who are "wronged", if the matter only involves the examination of the public, then it is all about it.

But once the bottom line is not kept, once it is changed, the slippery slope may be unpredictable.

Fill in the blanks: if parents do this and this, children are not allowed to do this and that. This void, you might as well use your imagination to fill it? Anyway, children are weaknesses, have you heard this?

Do you think the people who are most afraid of this sentence will be those corrupt officials?

Today's society under the rule of law is, of course, alarmist. But since you live under the sky and your body is fragile, don't you still have to have a bad person?