Text/Moe Mama Education Diary

Today, when the employment problem of college students is "increasingly serious", it has become the first choice for many students.

Stable work, high salary, and no need to worry about future employment have also become the main reasons for many students to take the public examination. In order to alleviate the employment problem of college graduates, some public institutions and preparation positions have set up many fresh graduates to apply for advantageous positions.

However, the preparation of the public examination is not only based on the students' written test results, how well the interview plays, and the physical examination and political review after that, which are very important links.

Especially in the political examination of civil servants, many students are unqualified and unable to go ashore every year because of the political examination. Because the political review will not only examine the students themselves, but also adjust the three generations of relatives of the students, in this regard, the students cannot control it.

"I made a mistake, why should I let my child pay?" , Is it fair to sit in a political trial?

Xiao Li is a fresh graduate, and like many students after graduation, he chose to take the public examination. After unremitting efforts, he achieved good results in the written test and interview, but it was brushed off in the final political trial, because Xiao Li's father had left a criminal record when he was young.

Faced with such a situation, Xiao Li's father was greatly annoyed, and he asked the political examiner: "I made a mistake, why should I let my children pay?" "What age is it now, and it's still engaged in that set." ”

However, the political examiner said that if the policy is relaxed, then will not everyone have "awe" before making mistakes. Parents feel that "making mistakes is not as good as their children and grandchildren" anyway, wouldn't it be more unscrupulous.

Moreover, it is not unfair to review the direct relatives of three generations of candidates in the political review. Now that the popularity of civil servants applying for the examination is so high, employers naturally have to screen more outstanding talents, screen out candidates with "flaws", and the industry can develop better.

In fact, similar situations happen every year. Regarding whether children should pay for their parents' mistakes, netizens have different opinions. Some netizens believe that students are independent individuals, as long as the students themselves are progressive, have a good style, and have excellent character and learning, and the wrong things that parents have done in the past have nothing to do with current students.

But some netizens believe that a person's growth will be affected by the family, if the "joint sitting" is really canceled, won't it bury "hidden dangers" for the development of society?

In this regard, some people have put forward a proposal to "remove the restrictions on the examination of children of crime to the public". And said, "one person makes a mistake and one person deserves", why do parents make mistakes affect their children's way of thinking? This idea is contrary to the development of modern civilization. Aren't parents necessarily bad when they make mistakes?

It is recommended to relax the public examination of children of crime, Luo Xiang's comment hit the nail on the head, but most netizens did not buy it

In fact, with the continuous development of society, in recent years, there have indeed been many suggestions to relax the restrictions on the public examination of parents who commit crimes, and some people feel that this is not fair to students, they study hard, in fact, they want to get rid of this worldly prejudice, but in the end they can't even pass the political trial, which is really embarrassing.

In response to this problem, teacher Luo Xiang also expressed his views. Teacher Luo Xiang believes that the existence of criminal law is to a certain extent to play an educational role. It is the hope that a person can rehabilitate, not completely block their future development path.

If one person makes a mistake and the whole family has to be "labeled" like him, then the connection between criminal law and education is still far from it.

In short, Mr. Luo Xiang also supports the proposal to remove restrictions on criminal children entering public service. After all, a person who makes mistakes still has the opportunity to rehabilitate, his children have excellent grades, excellent character and learning, and there is no problem with thinking and style, so why should they be restricted in the public examination?

In the face of Mr. Luo Xiang's opinion, some netizens expressed support, believing that this is more fair and just. But more netizens didn't buy it.

Some netizens believe that if the restrictions are removed, then to a certain extent, it will "increase the chance of crime". There are also 10,000 yuan purchases that the original family has a far-reaching impact on the child's world view and outlook on life, so it does not support cancellation.

Some netizens said that if children enjoy the benefits of their parents because of "mistakes", why can't they pay for their parents' mistakes? Instead of sympathizing with them, we should question their parents why they don't behave well.

Summary: In fact, from the perspective of each release, there is some truth. However, in any case, at present, the requirements for political examination on the mainland, whether it is the examination for public service or editing, or the application for police academies and military academies, are still relatively strict.

It is unknown whether the policy will be relaxed in the future, but from the current point of view, parents and students must be cautious in their words and actions and not touch the bottom line of the law.

Today's topic: Do you support the relaxation of restrictions on public service entrance examinations for children of crime? #头条创作挑战赛 #