It is found that the criteria for determining the unit price of headline creation revenue are not objective enough, and the objectively quantifiable criteria such as impressions, views, and the number of fans attracted have little impact on the unit price of revenue

It is found that the criteria for determining the unit price of headline creation revenue are not objective enough, and the objective quantifiable standards such as impressions and views and the number of fans attracted have little impact on the unit price of revenue creation, while the so-called high-quality content with stronger subjective preference and lack of objective quantitative standards has the greatest impact on the unit price of creation revenue, so that the revenue of original article impressions and reading volume is very different.

For example, I have more than 107,000 fans, The total reading volume is 105 million, the unit price of 1,000-word reading is only a few cents, and the income of explosive articles is only a dozen yuan at most, and the number of fans and works is far inferior to my author, because the unit price of 1,000-word reading reaches a few yuan, resulting in hundreds or even thousands of dollars, and even when I have a high-quality creator certification, the unit price of 1,000-word reading is very small or even later dropped to a few cents, far less than these authors with very few fans and few works, I hope that Toutiao encourages authors who have been working hard for a long time to create high-quality content, and the standard for determining the unit price of creation income is more objective and quantitative.