Some of today's talk goes against common sense. We often hear in the mass media who is who is who is fresh meat, this person is not very good, that is, he looks handsome and has a good figure, and then he can be popular, there are so many fans like him, why? We people work hard, study hard, practice morning every day, and then what about the line skills, and then we actually don't have a very high box office, especially unhappy, why are they not happy?
They feel like with all their effort, their skills deserve more, but they just don't, right? Instead, those who they thought were less skilled than him made more money, and they were extremely upset. So they're going to lash out at the thing. But it seems to me that this is not the case. They think they are talented.
It's not a key factor in their success. A person's success does not depend on his talent, seizing opportunities and grasping opportunities are two different levels of things, many people cannot understand.
Many people have cultivated the ability to cultivate, but they have the possibility of grasping the opportunity. But the point is that he does not have the previous thing, called grasping the opportunity. He does not have the conditions to grasp the opportunity, how can he seize the opportunity? What does he catch? Does he grab air? He has nothing to attach to.
Remember such a saying. Anyone who can succeed and get opportunities must be who he helped someone become. You understand it well. Why do those little fresh meats make so much money? Because this person himself is very powerful? No, why can he seize the so-called opportunities, even if he does not have much strength, why can, he seize certain opportunities?
Because he helps certain people, certain groups realize the possibility that they want to be other people and groups. So he jumped at the chance. As for whether he can grasp it tightly, it depends on his true talent. But at least people have caught red for at least a year or two, so whether they can catch the red longer and maintain it longer is another matter. It's just that many people can't understand it. Let me give you an example.
Have you seen The King of Comedy? It doesn't matter if you haven't seen it. I'll talk about it in general. What about the king of comedy? It was played by Karen Mok and Stephen Chow, and Karen Mok played a female star in it. Then Stephen Chow played a young actor who aspired to be a male star in it, and every day he was studying his skills. Stanislavsky performance system, an actor's self-cultivation, is this Soviet-style way of acting, Stanislavsky performance system, and then immerse yourself in the role every day.
There is another performance system. It's called the Brecht performance system. There is also Mei Lanfang's performance system. Brecht's acting system, he doesn't ask you to immerse yourself in the character, what he pays attention to, the fourth wall. I forgot all these systems, this doesn't matter, it's not very important. Theory is something you forget about for a long time. But what's the point? It is the role played by Karen Mok is a female star. Why should she support the role played by Stephen Chow, called Yin Tianqiu, you just remember that her name is Stephen Chow. With so many names, some people can't remember, just Stephen Chow wants to be an actor, just when Mo Wenwei asked him to come over as an actor, or is it playing his own male number, why?
Stephen Chow thought that his acting skills were particularly good. Oops, you see finally saw my shining point, you look at my Stanislavsky performance system, an actor's self-cultivation is still not learned in vain. Is this really the case?
No, why did he get this opportunity, and why? It is because the male number one we originally hired has no schedule and temporarily released pigeons. Then Karen Mok is out of self-esteem on the one hand, and wants to prove his box office appeal alone on the other hand, which is still okay. So he used the role played by Stephen Chow to support him. So Stephen Chow was able to get this role, and good acting skills are just an advantage. But not a sufficient and necessary condition, right?
But Stephen Chow, he may mistakenly think that you think that I can get this role because of my years of hard work. It's because I have been studying the performance system for many years, because you saw me waiting there conscientiously, so he saw it, was moved, and then chose me, but it wasn't. It is possible that the situation will change suddenly. What changes? For example, the male number one who was originally going to act with Mo Wenwei is back, saying that I have a schedule again, so can Stephen Chow still act? Can't act, why can't I act? Is it because his acting skills have deteriorated? It is impossible, the acting skills will only get better and better, more and more exquisite and more skillful. It has a compounding effect over time, right? Slowly it becomes an old drama bone.
So why can't it be acted? Is it because the original element that gave him that opportunity has changed, what is that element? Personnel changes, because personnel changes give him opportunities. It is also because of another personnel change that he lost the opportunity, and this is the opportunity. So a lot of people don't understand what opportunity is. Stephen Chow thought that the opportunity was something, a certain film, right? He thought that his competitiveness was his own, and his acting skills were particularly good. Two or two meats are particularly large, suitable for a certain film, you see this film is particularly good, especially suitable for me. That's why I had this opportunity, which is really not the case.
All the opportunities are because some big brother left, and the big brother left. Then it just so happened that Mo Wenwei needed a pillow again, that needed a water cup, and you just handed it over, and this is the opportunity. And good acting can only be regarded as an advantage. And this advantage is not good for you to be able to seize the opportunity. It is not a particularly big impact, and the arrival of an opportunity depends on many factors. And one of your qualities and strengths is one of them. Not all of them can be regarded as the key to success or failure.
Let me give you another example, which should be more difficult for you to understand. There are two people in the company, one is A and the other is B, and this A's contribution is greater to the company and makes money for the company. B It may not be as good as A. This is a precondition. So what is the question I ask?
Is A and B11 easier to promote? According to the idea I just talked about, it must be A, because A contributes more to the company and makes more money for the company, but not necessarily. It may be B why everyone.
Because if there is no person behind A who supports him, and B has behind him, then A's comprehensive strength is not as good as BYou say that you have earned money for the whole company, but the shares of the whole company are scattered, and the chairman of the larger listed company himself has less than 10% in his hands. Most of the shares may be in institutions, funds, and the entire executive team. So who will support you? All shareholders? They don't know you, they don't know your value, right? Do they know who you are for and how much you contribute to them? They don't know, you understand? So when the subject behind you is not very clear, it means that you are alone.
That B may not contribute as much as yours, but the subject behind him is very clear. It's some little executive, and that executive is also a shareholder, and he's the one standing behind this B. So there will be someone to give him a voice, someone to give him a voice, someone to give him support, someone to give him support. His support will be seen and heard by many people.
So it will be easier for him to get promoted a little. Do you understand? This thing. But no one told you. It is very important for others to see. So try your best to make people see you.
Because there are some brainwashing remarks in the workplace, who does everyone like? People who like to talk less and do more. But such people can only be used as screws, but I hope you will do the opposite, so that you can stand out.
When a person achieves a certain grade, especially in your unit, they will not tell you the truth. Because if you tell you the truth of a lot of promotions, you will surpass him, so he wants to appease you and tell you that you don't work so hard, you don't work so hard, he won't tell you some core passwords.
Because people are the butts that determine the head, people like people who talk less and do more. But if you want to succeed, you have to talk more and do less, what does the boss do. The boss does not do the most, the boss must say the most, say more, let others do it clearly.
You look at the people who regularly attend various launches. People who represent the company everywhere, who can speak on behalf of the industry, seem to have done nothing, but in fact, he has gained a huge voice, so that more people realize that his influence slowly comes out. Slowly everyone felt that he was very capable. When everyone thinks you are very capable, you have ability if you don't have ability.