Introduction: The founding path of "Mahatma Gandhi": Even a pig can fly when standing in the wind
The world is big and strange, we think that the big people are in a state of being on top and spoiled, but there are always some big people who can help us break this "stubborn" impression, like what "super loser" Lord Qiu, "women's clothing gangster" Clinton, "understand the king" Comrade Trump, etc., but these are all small fights, India's "big brother" is the real top.
This Indian "big brother" is Gandhi, known as the Mahatma, who took India to a "open and hanging" road.
There are saints in China, and people in India feel that people can no longer satisfy them, so they will do the most "top" one, so people call them "Mahatma", and people want to "C debut".
The reason why India is able to operate now is largely because when Gandhi founded the country, a series of operations carved these genes into their bones.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="22" >C debut "Mahatma"</h1>
Gandhi's origin is very prominent, his father is the prime minister of the local state, is a local famous family, the rich second generation of Gandhi, life is very moist, and when he was nineteen years old, he was sent to study in England, majoring in law, and the family wanted him to revitalize the family after returning from his studies.
However, although Gandhi was baptized by Western culture, he was not deeply influenced, but on the contrary, he had a strong interest in local religion, which led to his rejection of modern industrial civilization, so he said in a public speech that it was better to build factories in India than to give money directly to Britain, otherwise they would not only lose money, but even those who survived would be destroyed, and he also believed that India's development was so slow because of the oppression of modern industrial civilization and the colonizers.
The brain circuits are really strange, after all, the whole world was industrializing at that time, and Gandhi was going against the current.
Can you imagine what direction the country will develop under such a leader? In fact, it is not surprising that Gandhi had such a thought, because the Congress party in which Gandhi was located was attached to Britain at that time, how could he say bad things about his master?
Gandhi also proposed a policy that we now think is very ridiculous, "non-violent non-cooperation", does not prohibit the Indian masses to fight, but the resistance should be measured, non-cooperation can meet the needs of the radical population in India at that time, so that everyone looks very "harmonious", which makes Gandhi quickly win the hearts of the people, but this is just a imaginary situation, really implemented, really hot eyes.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="21" > slogans are loud and do not do real things</h1>
The first was not to do anything for the colonial government, the second was not to go to public schools, and finally not to use British goods.
These slogans shouted quite loudly, the specific implementation is not so comfortable, said not to do things for Britain, but hundreds of thousands of people only a hundred people to do, the last two things are doing well, but think about it, who is hurt in the end? The people have no way to learn, and the slow sale of British goods has led to a soaring domestic price, and the big capitalists in the country are making a lot of money, this kind of selling goods under patriotic slogans and making the people pay, is this what Gandhi pursued?
Gandhi advocated "non-violent non-cooperation", and he regarded this form as more important than anyone else, because the Indian masses did not pay, which made the British very angry and decided to suppress this situation, and whenever this happened, Gandhi ran out to stop the Indians who wanted to do it, and often threatened these people with hunger strikes, such a revolution was really unheard of.
But why did Gandhi become the founder of India?
Quite simply, driven by the international wave, the Indian people's idea of independence has become stronger, coupled with the 1946 Mumbai naval uprising, so that britain has a new consideration of this colony, because under the wave of the industrial revolution, the benefits of colonizing this agricultural civilization land can no longer satisfy these people, but the annual maintenance cost is an astronomical amount, it is better to withdraw directly, so that the loss can be smaller. After all, the industrial country can use the freedom of trade to complete the plundering of the resources of an agricultural country.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="18" > [Conclusion].</h1>
India's independence was not Gandhi's efforts to turn the tide, he was just a ruler who stood at the outlet, just as even a pig could fly when it stood in the outlet.
And the reason why Gandhi is still admired in India is only because the current regime is still the same regime at that time, and which regime have you ever seen completely negate the decisions it has made? The reason why the West agrees with this view is only because such a way of handling it will allow its interests to continue.