I finally feel why I have to knock on the big LOGO, and the big LOGO is opening the curtain between the economy class and the first class
The curtain between the rich and the poor can only be understood as ineffable
Many people are uneven for "tapping" the big LOGO, thinking that a blogger who takes the people every day to see how the rich spend, there is nothing to kill
At this time, in the Zheng Shuang incident, I saw the truth of the matter
Zhang Heng and the big LOGO did the same thing, helping the people to open the curtain of rich and poor
Zheng Shuang filmed a play, 77 days, earned 160 million, and made 2.08 million yuan per day
The deputy director of the Beijing Human Resources and Social Security Bureau pretended to be a takeaway brother to deliver takeaways, and earned 40 yuan a day
Zheng Shuang's salary for a day is more than 50,000 times that of the takeaway brother
Curtains should not be lifted
The big LOGO was lifted, and Zhang Heng was lifted
The difference is
The big LOGO opened the curtain, I only saw the flight attendants serving the empty seats attentively, I couldn't see the people in the seats, so I thought it was quite novel
Zhang Heng opened the curtain, and this time I finally saw that the flight attendant was serving Zheng Shuang!
So I felt an imbalance in my heart
Some people will say that not every rich person is like Zheng Shuang, and many rich people rely on their own efforts and talents to get rich legally!
Friends who say this have grasped the wrong point, and the focus is not how the rich people's money comes from
The focus is on the curtains
Forty years after the reform and opening up, China has now substantively entered the reform of the deep water area, the word deep water area is used very well, what is the deep water area?
In layman's terms, the water inside is very deep
The main contradiction in the current social development is spoken in the news and at the congress, every day, day by day, and every word and sentence is clearly and clearly explained
The unbalanced and inadequate development of our society has become the main contradiction of the country
This is the root
When the curtain is lifted, how to let me, who is in economy class, see him in first class, do not have resentment in my heart, is the key
And there may be several ways to keep people from feeling resentful
1, there is no first class, of course, there is no economy class
2, sitting in front, is an admirable person
It can be a scientist, it can be an entrepreneur, it can be everyone who has made a fortune through legal means, and of course it can be a star actor
The star actor conquers the audience with his character and acting skills, and of course can be "superior" in terms of life enjoyment.
But when I see this goods sitting behind the curtain, can I not be resentful in my heart?
Can anyone tell me what this thing is? 160 million?
Am I hating 160 million? I hate why this level can be 160 million?
A drama is paid 160 million, what level in the world?
Last year, the world's highest-paid male star was Dwayne Johnson
Johnson starred in the film "Red Notice", which paid the highest salary per film, at $23.5 million, or about 150 million yuan
There is no harm without contrast, and the more you compare, the greater the damage
The world's highest paid male star is not as good as Zheng Shuang's bad drama
Who gave her the courage to take 160 million? At first, it was too little, asking for 180 million, and after bargaining, it was agreed to 160 million
Is this stuff worth 160 million?
Pure fraud
Why is someone willing to pay this 160 million to Zheng Shuang? Some people say that it is a washing Q, but this needs evidence, but from the logic of capital, it is a sad market
Traffic is everything, rather than calm down and polish the script, select powerful actors, and grind a sword for ten years to produce a work, it is better to directly go to the traffic to make money quickly
Whether it is Tencent, iQiyi, Youku, these platforms, or movie platforms, to take the films you make, the most important criterion for judging is whether the actors you invite have traffic
The traffic of actors, there are real, there are also a large wave of fans and brush companies brushing, but no matter how true your traffic is a little bit fake, the huge traffic is film and television investors, and platform buyers, the most important or even the only criterion
If you are an investor with a conscience, you look for old drama bones to star, find clever screenwriters to take the script, shooting takes three years and five years, but in the end your film is likely to be no one
Someone else said, "Who is the lead actor?" Is there a quantity? ”
You say it's "so-and-so, forty years old drama bones." ”
Then, there is no then
The truth is just that brutal
Some directors have called for improving the taste of the audience, and the taste of Chinese audiences is too low, so it has caused the stubborn disease that investors only look at the traffic
But the problem is that most of the traffic is created by young people, and many are still minors, brushing traffic to celebrities every day
You let the audience improve their taste, do not know that the general public is 996 every day, by the mortgage, by the education of the inner volume, overwhelmed, how can there be energy to cheer for their favorite actors?
If I had an easier time, maybe I would take some time to vote online, swipe a thumbs up, and create some traffic for the old drama bones I like
But is this possible?
It's a vicious circle
In 2017, a policy was introduced at the national level to limit the remuneration of actors not to exceed 40% of the cost, and some people cheered that the era of traffic stars was over
But there are countermeasures under the policy
After the "salary restriction order" was introduced, a large number of star studios mushroomed
Why are all the major traffic stars starting studios?
To put it bluntly, one is to avoid taxes, and the other is to engage in yin-yang contracts
The earliest method of tax avoidance for actors is to give all cash and pure tax avoidance
Later, the film remuneration was often millions of millions, and all-cash was unrealistic, so it was a yin-yang contract
The state stipulates that the remuneration for the film is not allowed to exceed 40%, so we will engage in yin-yang contracts, also called large and small contracts
Sign a small contract on the surface for tax returns
For large contracts, tax avoidance is achieved by exchanging performance fees for shares in the company, and the company inflates profits
Before Fan Bingbing engaged in yin and yang contracts, it was the same method, small contracts of 10 million, large contracts of 50 million, and tax declarations were only reported as small
And the big contract will generally not be the name of the star, and the big contract will also be marked as after-tax income
Doing so is tantamount to helping the star clear its legal responsibilities
The star is not stupid, the legal responsibility has long been clear, even if it is found out that the tax evasion is found, it is also the responsibility of the company responsible for distributing labor services to her, and she does not need to go to jail
Interestingly, when the People's Daily mentioned yesterday that it wanted to check the yin-yang contract, a large number of companies associated with the stars were written off in a frenzy
Overnight emergency cancellation, is this a modern version of "no silver three hundred and two here"?
Some people say, check, just follow this cancellation route, fiercely check, these stars, none of them can run
But I feel pessimistic
This incident, most like the "Fan Bingbing Incident" in 2018, killed a typical, and then it will be stopped
The "Fan Bingbing Incident" in 2018 was so violent that it was simply a tsunami storm, but what was the result? Lift high and gently lower
Today's Zheng Shuang incident will not cause a complete change in the entertainment industry
Now the more celebrities who write off the company, the safer that group of stars will be
The law does not blame the public, it is the old reason
You wouldn't think the stars were all fighting alone, would you?
And in a short period of time, then a large number of stars in a unified pace to cancel the relevant companies, they have long formed a solid community of interests with each other
Celebrities, there must be WeChat groups behind their backs, and they must all be discussed, we log off together, cover each other, the more people we act together, the safer it is
Therefore, the result of this incident is most likely the same as Fan Bingbing's incident, catching a typical, killing chickens and monkeys, and waiting for the limelight to pass and make a comeback
To solve this problem, the law must be changed from the root:
Regarding the scope of the identification of celebrity yin and yang contracts and the sentencing standards, these can only be changed from the legal level and tightened the fence, and it is possible to change the ecology of the entertainment industry
If not jailed, the star can get a lot of money by relying on the yin-yang contract, and can also get rid of legal responsibility
It is useless to kill chickens and monkeys
Do you think monkeys are stupid? Monkeys can be refined
You think it's a monkey, but you don't know that behind this monkey there is a professional tax team, a professional legal team, a professional public relations team, you don't have a real determined hand, you can't get the monkeys
Finally, the contradiction about the deep water zone
Most people do not hate the rich, but hate the rich who "come from the wrong way" and the rich who are "not kind to the rich"
Confucius said: Do not suffer from widowhood but from inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but from uneasiness
Don't worry about less wealth, but worry about uneven distribution
Do not worry about the small population, but worry about people being unstable
China's per capita annual income is 30,000, and the monthly income of 600 million people is only 1,000
Remember the question of "not lifting the curtain" at the beginning of the article?
Do you think this "curtain" of poverty and wealth should be lifted?
In fact, the truth is that in China, even the people who can see the curtain are a minority, and it is not easy for you to sit in the economy class and see the curtain in the first class
The premier said that China's 600 million people earn 1,000 a month, and these people are not even qualified to sit down and "look at the curtains"
Their daily lives are filled with work, not to mention "looking at the curtain", they don't think about the curtain at all
Who is Zheng Shuang, you ask them? They are also confused
But this is the real China
Most people have never seen a curtain
A few people saw the curtain
Very few people were on the other side of the curtain
And when most people have never seen the curtain, the first task of society is not to open the curtain at all, but to let them see the curtain
Only when the majority of people in society are qualified to see the curtain can we talk about the next step, how to open the curtain
Otherwise, if you don't even take the first step, you are anxious to lift the curtain, and the ending may backfire