Text / Golden Wrong Knife Channel
Will winning an award definitely lead to the peak of life?
It's hard to say the peak, and winning awards can sometimes make people go "crazy".
In the selection of the 13th Golden Broom Awards, Bao Bell's remake of "Sunshine Sisters" won the "Most Disappointing Director Award".
Bao Bell was so angry that he used a broad and profound Chinese in the circle of friends to "cordial greetings" organizer Cheng Qingsong is a "big fool X".
Not only did he question the impartiality of the Golden Broom Award, but he also believed that the prize ruined everyone's hard work.
It doesn't matter if he scolds this, the whole network knows that he won the award, and made a wave of free publicity for the golden broom, which originally had little attention.
As a result, everyone found that Bao Bell broke the defense because he had already won two "golden brooms".
The attitude of the audience also appeared two views: those who defend the actors think that the golden broom is a "pheasant award", which is to sensationalize and rub traffic.
But more people stand on the side of the golden broom, thinking that even without this award, Bao Bell has long won the worst director countless times in the hearts of the audience.
Is it the golden broom taking the opportunity to vent his anger, or is Bauber too glassy?
In fact, just because of offending peers, China's most poisonous tongue award, almost stopped three times.
68 awards in the Chinese film and television circle,
There is only one "great evildoer"
Is Bao Bell the "most disappointing director"?
One thing is for sure, the passing line for others as directors is 6 points, but 6.2 points has reached the ceiling of Bauber's reputation.
From actor to director, he is more and more courageous.
"Rejoice Secret Agent", 6.2 points.
Our New Life, 4.8 points.
"Fat Squad", 4.2 points.
Although whether it is filmed or acted, there is no quality to speak of, and it is almost synonymous with bad movies, but Bao Bell is insisting.
Until last year, Bao Bell filmed "Sunshine Sisters", Xitijin Broom.
Because the original film of this movie is on Douban, more than 560,000 people scored 8.8 points, ranking among the top 250 Douban movies. The audience was not only disappointed, but also hated that iron could not be made of steel: even copying homework, Bao Bell did not copy it well.
And 13 years ago, a large number of bad films stimulated a filmmaker named Cheng Qingsong.
Cheng Qingsong, who was the editor-in-chief of the Youth Film Handbook at the time, said, "I think there really must be an award for selecting bad films." Otherwise, many viewers will be angry when they walk into the cinema. ”
Not only that, some movies obviously have a poor response from the audience, but "industry insiders" have applauded. Film criticism increasingly lacks an authentic voice.
68 awards in the Chinese film and television circle, Golden Eagle, Hundred Flowers, Golden Horse... Sixty-seven of them are encouraging and commending.
But only the golden broom has become the responsibility of the negative evaluation system in the Chinese film and television industry.
Cheng Qingsong took the name "Golden Broom", which was intended to stir up the turbidity and clean up Chinese films.
Because of its negative nature, it has not been welcomed by the mainstream.
At the time of the first award ceremony, founder Cheng Qingsong could only pay out of his own pocket and spent 5,000 yuan to hold it in a very simple open-air venue, compared with other film awards, the golden broom looked quite shabby.
In addition to the lack of money, most of the winners don't say that they go to collect the prize, and they are discouraged when asked in the interview.
Either choose to ignore it and let the topic cool down on its own.
For example, Zhang Yimou has successively mentioned the Most Disappointing Film Award for "Three Guns Shooting Surprise" and "Hawthorn Tree Love" for two consecutive years, to which he has not responded and made a movie with his head down.
Yang Mi, who has always been good at self-blackening, won the queen laurel at the Golden Broom Award three times, and also chose to remain silent.
Either the actor is silent and the fans are asking for justice.
In 2020, "Immortal 1" defeated "Shanghai Fortress" in comparison with rottenness, Golden Broom awarded the worst actor award to Xiao Zhan, and actress to Meng Meiqi.
Although Cheng Qingsong has responded many times, "This is not aimed at Xiao Zhan personally, nor at all his works, but at his acting skills in "Immortal 1". ”
But angry fans still scolded the Golden Broom Award on the hot search.
In this way, the golden broom offended a group of peers and could not find a sponsor at all.
The Hong Kong media once set up the Golden Durian and Golden Words Mei Awards to select the "worst Chinese film of the year", but these two awards were held for a few sessions and then disappeared.
In 2013, 2014 and 2016, the Golden Broom was "on the verge of closure".
Can't pull a dime of sponsorship money,
but was saved by the honest man Wang Baoqiang
No star to receive the award became the "feature" of the golden broom, and this embarrassing situation lasted for eight years.
Until the appearance of the honest Wang Baoqiang, he became the first A-list star to receive the award.
In 2018, Wang Baoqiang was selected as the most disappointing director with "The Big Trouble". Woe is not alone, "The Trouble" also won the Most Disappointing Film and Most Disappointing Screenwriting Awards.
Standing on the stage, facing this terrible award, Wang Bao raised the golden broom generously.
"It's not a glorious award, but it can spur people to progress," he said. I personally come to accept criticism because I love movies, respect movies, respect audiences, and respect the seniors here. ”
"My first time as a director is really inexperienced, there are many shortcomings, and I believe that after hard work, I will become a qualified director."
Finally, Wang Baoqiang also apologized to the audience, hoping that this was the first and last time to receive this award.
The words are earnest, and there are four words between the lines: humble and down-to-earth.
As soon as he compared with Bao Bell, he stood on the top.
Wang Baoqiang has works and acting skills, and is still willing to accept criticism with an open heart. And Bao Bell has been spinning around in bad films all these years, but he is obsessed with finding problems from awards, not from himself.
It was also from this time that the golden broom had attention, and many practitioners began to face up to their bad films.
In 2019, Bi Zhifei was nominated for "the most disappointing film of the Golden Broom Decade" with the epic bad film "Pure Heart, Chasing Dreams in Showbiz".
Bi Zhifei also went to the scene and apologized to the audience on Weibo.
In 2013, the little Shenyang, which was in the midst of the explosion, expressed his views on the award although he did not come to the scene.
Foreign actors have a more attitude when attending the American Golden Raspberry, but it is not Bauber's broken and broken attitude.
2004's "Catwoman" won the worst movie, the worst director, the worst script and the worst heroine in one go.
The heroine ridiculed the director and agent on stage: "They really love me so much, they know how bad the film is, and they persuaded me to act." ”
Actress Sandra Bullock personally attended the ceremony, generously accepted the Worst Actress Award, and pulled a car of DVDs and gave them to the organizing committee.
But a few days later, with another movie "Weakness", people turned around and won the Oscar.
Giving awards to bad films is not a rotten, it is more like the self-management of the industry.
Whether at home or abroad, the response method has "homework to copy", obviously, Bao Bell did not copy well.
Even the President of the United States dares to scold,
Why is the Golden Sour Plum Award so large-scale?
Compared with the annoyance of the "Babels" who were torn off the fig leaf by the golden broom, the foreign Golden Raspberry Award is very different:
Not only is it more open, the scale is larger, and the authority is also higher.
Every year, the Golden Raspberry Awards are held the day before the Oscars, and insisting on telling the truth is the consistent style of the Golden Raspberry Awards.
From "Transformers 5" to "The Mummy", from Michael Bay to Tom, whether it is a super blockbuster with a box office of more than 100 million, or a top American superstar, Jin Sour Plum has directly fired a shot.
In 2019, Trump was shortlisted for "Worst Actor" for playing himself in two documentaries, "Fahrenheit 11/9" and "Death of the State".
Good fellow, even the President of the United States dares to scold.
It is also to offend people, why does the Golden Raspberry Award dare to be on such a large scale?
Not only does it need the support of the industry here, but the core lies in whether there is a definite professional mechanism behind it.
The golden broom was questioned for its authority, which was a loss in professionalism.
For example, in the list of "most disappointing actors" released in 2017, there was a situation where the protagonist, supporting role, and dragon set stewed in one pot, and the powerful and idol factions scuffled.
In the 10 into 5 voted by the audience, there were 5 traffic stars, 4 old drama bones, and one old cadre.
The most controversial Wang Junkai only appeared in "The Great Wall" for 2 minutes, although he was not elected in the end, but this selection list is not very scientific.
It is no wonder that Wang Junkai's fans are aggrieved by the idol.
The "Golden Raspberry Award" in the United States further subdivides the awards into: "leading actor", "supporting actor", "female lead", "supporting actress" and so on.
Since you want to take the "Golden Raspberry Award" as an example, you need to further plan the setting of the award and determine the requirements for the nomination of candidates.
The list needs to be professional, and the voting mechanism needs to be professional.
In the past, because the golden broom did not limit the number of votes and there was no threshold to limit voting users, the result became a melee of fans, either gangs or crazy votes.
At the same time, it also led to the number of votes being cleared several times.
In this regard, it can also be learned from golden raspberries.
Taking the 29th edition as an example, the Golden Raspberry Awards are composed of about 650 journalists, theater fans, and professional film industry personnel. Votes came from 45 U.S. states and 19 other countries.
The "Golden Raspberry Award" limits the main voting crowd in the audience voting crowd and ensures the objectivity and representativeness of the vote. At the same time, for online voting, it is only for paid members.
If you want to insist on telling the truth on bad reviews, you must not only dare to pick, but also pick professionalism.
Conclusion:
When the audience faces bad movies, there are always some soul tortures.
Why dare to be a director before the play is understood? Why lack basic judgment about your own abilities? No matter how many bad movies there are, they still can't be photographed?
At the 33rd Popular Film Hundred Flowers Awards, Li Yifeng and Angelababy killed Zhang Yi, Duan Yihong, Yao Chen, etc. respectively, and won the Best Supporting Actor and Actor trophy.
As soon as the result came out, the Hundred Flowers Award was scolded to delete all Weibo that night.
Zhang Han was confident before the broadcast of "Gentlemen of the East Eighth District", thinking that it would definitely be a fire, and was directly removed from the entire network.
It can be seen that it is really difficult for the film and television industry to hear the truth.
No one denies that making a film requires the hard work of the crew, but hard work ≠ a good movie.
The mechanism for bad reviews of Chinese films and television should exist and continue to be improved. Without bad reviews, then the "Baobers" and "Zhang Hans" will never hear the opposition. All they hear is praise.
Criticism, though harsh, is an indispensable force for progress.
Bad reviews are not for sensationalism, but to hope that there are no bad films in the world. The most powerful counterattack is not a foul mouth, but a good work.
Because the best works are worthy of applause, bad films do not need to be condoned.
The picture comes from the Internet, please contact to delete the infringement
The author of this article | Zhang Yichi