Apologizing for the reckless and impulsive evaluation of Zhong Hanliang's version of "Tianlong", until he saw Yang Youning's version, he finally understood his youth and ignorance.
When it comes to "Eight Parts of the Heavenly Dragon", people will think of Qiao Feng, who is arrogant and heavenly, the false bamboo with a buddha's mouth and compassion, and the tianshan tongyao who is domineering and high...
Hu Jun and Huang Rihua's version of "Tianlong Babu" is a classic in the classic, and those remakes have exhausted all their strength to make it difficult to shake half a point.
However, compared with these two versions, Hu Jun's version of "Tianlong Babu" "lost" to Huang Rihua's version of 0.5 points, this slight gap, where is the "hiding"?
First of all, it is undeniable that Hu Jun's version is very good, but it is not as good as Huang Rihua's version in terms of integrity.
In terms of lines, Hu Jun's version is more modern and more casual.
In the fight scene of Shaomu Mountain, the three brothers Qiao Feng, Xuan Zhu and Duan Yu got together and talked about wine and joy, and the atmosphere was originally rendered in place, but it was destroyed by a sentence of "let go and kill".
Looking closely, there are not many such lines, but they have a considerable impact on the whole.
The lines of the 97 version of "Tianlong" are mostly adapted from the original book, and the actors substitute roles when acting, and play that feeling.
The scene of Apricot Grove is a turning point in Qiao Feng's life. When Huang Rihua said his lines, people's hair stood upside down and their blood surged with blood. The lines are concise and powerful, and they are the tone of the old vernacular.
As we all know, the background of "Tianlong Babu" is the Northern Song Dynasty, which requires the use of "retro" dialogue, otherwise the audience will jump the drama.
You can't always say, "Why are you going, we're in a hurry." Such a modern word, the Hu Jun version did not appear, but compared with the 97 version, it is still less meaningful.
When Qiao Feng confronted Madame Ma, Hu Jun's version of the lines was somewhat long, lacking the domineering spirit that should be deserved, the first half was fine, and the second half did not show the "main tone" of this play.
Huang Rihua's version of Apricot Forest portrays each character very well, including Quan Guanqing, Madame Ma, Master Zhiguang, the four elders of the Cai Gang, and even small characters such as Zhang Quanxiang.
Overall, the 03 version is still slightly inferior. It's not all the actor's problem, and the lines are a big part of the reason. Even if the actors are all movie emperors, they can't change all the lines. Leaving aside the lines, Hu Jun's version of the group portrait portrayal does not give people a deep impression.
If there is no Huang Rihua version, I believe that the 03 version can be a god in one shot, but Zhu Yu is in front, and it is still difficult to ascend to the sky if you want to ascend to a higher level.
When it comes to the portrayal of supporting roles, we have to mention the "rhythm master" Quan Guanqing.
This man can speak the truth, lie a lot, help a lot of good guys, let him play a lot of tricks. The 03 version of the full crown qing, without that treacherous taste.
The 97 version of Quan Guanqing is played by Chen Rongjun, whose acting skills are quite outstanding, and he has played this treacherous role alive.
Seeing him and Madame Ma "eyebrow flirting" and framing Qiao Feng, the audience was eager to give him a few punches.
Quan Guanqing is a very important character in "Tianlong Babu", who promotes the main plot and plays the role of "carrying on the top and starting down".
The author Jin Yong wrote this character extremely well, and under the interpretation of Chen Rongjun, it can be regarded as "living" for the performance.
Of course, the 03 version also has brilliant characters, such as Zhong Ling played by Yang Rui, who gives people the impression that she is also quite deep, but she met He Meidian's Zhong Ling.
If you can only choose one person between Yang Rui and He Meidian, I believe that the latter is the most, after all, her Zhong Ling is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.
Duan Yanqing, the first of the four evil men in Hu Jun's version, played quite well, and Duan Yanqing was played by the gold medal villain Ji Chunhua.
As far as this character is concerned, the 97 version is far behind, and in Ji Chunhua's Duan Yanqing, you can see that fierceness.
Before he could say his lines, he was already chilling, and his style was outstanding.
It's just that a role like Ji Chunhua Duan Yanqing is too few in the 03 version of "Tianlong Eight Parts", how can a single branch be compared to a hundred flowers.
In addition to the two classic characters like Duan Yanqing and Chen Rongjun, there are also Tianshan Tongmao. In most people's minds, this is a difficult role to distinguish.
Some people say that Shu Chang's Tianshan Tong Yao is extremely good at acting and does not lose any version. The 97 version of Chen Anying's Tianshan Tong Yao was praised by Mr. Jin Yong, who performed the characteristics of the role.
In terms of styling, the comfortable Tianshan Tong Yao is somewhat thunderous, and Chen Anying's Tong Yao is "ordinary" and not so eye-catching.
As for who is stronger in the acting skills, this is a benevolent person, and the wise person sees wisdom.
When it comes to the characters in the Eight Parts of the Heavenly Dragon, Hatsuma Andi and the Sweeping Monk cannot avoid talking about it. The 97 version of Hatsuma Zhi is played by Li Guolin, and his Hatsuma Zhi's strength can be said to be obvious to all.
After he played this role, he did not expect it to be so popular.
This role is not controversial, and from the perspective of the original work, Li Guolin's Hatsuma Zhi is the most restored.
If you look closely at Hatsuma Zhi's entry into the Shaolin Temple, you will find that the expression on his face is constantly changing.
From the invincibility of the appearance, to the arrogance when the crowd of monks was frustrated, to the inability to play against the virtual bamboo martial arts, the fierceness on the face, Li Guolin portrayed every detail very well.
After deceiving the Shaolin Yi Jian Sutra from The Hand of You Tanzhi, Hatsuma Zhi laughed, looking left and right, afraid that others would come to rob the scriptures.
Seeing his impatience, when I was a child, I really thought that what he was holding in his hand was the secret of the world. Even if it is a prop in the play, it is still convinced that this is superb acting.
Li Guolin also did not expect that after many years, netizens would imitate the character of Hatsuma Zhi.
In the 03 version, Hatsumo Zhi did not know whether it was an illusion or what was going on, and always felt that the treasure was lacking solemn, fierce, and insufficient details.
As for the sweeping monk, no one in Bao Fang could stand out, and his sweeping monk seemed to have come out of the original work.
This is not a pre-entrapment, in the shaping of the character of the sweeping monk, Bao Fang is indeed a classic.
Liu Yucui and Chen Hao's Ah Zi, I think Liu Yucui acted better.
At that time, Jin Yong was on a business trip because of an incident, and before leaving, he entrusted his friend Ni Kuang to serialize the "Eight Parts of the Heavenly Dragon", which happened to be written to Ah Zi.
When Ni Kuang saw that this little girl was very annoying, she cleverly used a magic pen to write Ah Zi blind.
In addition to his dislike, Ni Kuang also wanted to test Jin Yong to see how he dismantled his moves.
Ni Kuang made a move, Jin Yong dismantled the move, and finally restored Ah Zi's eyes.
Later, Jin Yong obtained Ni Kuang's consent and deleted all the parts written by Ni Kuang, leaving only the setting that Ah Zi was blind.
Behind the character of Ah Zi, there is such an interesting little story, so this character must have a three-dimensional sense.
Liu Yucui's Ah Zi acted naturally, without any trace of performance, which is quite a remarkable thing.
Judging from the plot presented, Liu Yucui has substituted Ah Zi, in other words, she is Ah Zi, and Ah Zi is Liu Yucui.
Chen Hao is indeed beautiful, fascinating, and is a big beauty of Peugeot.
As far as the role of Ah Zi is concerned, Chen Hao has not got rid of the craftsmanship, although he is not acting for the sake of acting, but he has always stayed in the realm of "acting".
If you analyze the appearance of Ah Zi from the original work, Chen Hao seems to be more suitable for this role, but Liu Yucui is more godly, which is something that Chen Hao does not have.
On hate, Liu Cui's A Zi did it; Say pity, she did it too.
What else can such a Purple ask for?
Let's talk about the protagonist Qiao Feng.
Hu Jun's Qiao Feng, the details are insufficient, and the integrity is not as good as Huang Rihua. Qiao Feng is a character with connotations, and the details are particularly important, which is the soul of a character.
Qiao Feng mistakenly killed Aju, causing a tragedy, and the big mistake had already been made, even if he was Qiao Feng, who was strong in martial arts and arrogant, he also lacked skills.
The death of Aju, Mo said that it was Qiao Feng, the audience watched, and could not help but be distressed.
However, from the performance point of view, Hu Jun's Qiao Feng does not seem to be particularly sad, and in the handling of this scene, it has not reached the level it should have.
On the other hand, after Huang Rihua killed Arjun by mistake, his heart was like a knife, and he was eager to die.
The look of losing a loved one gives the audience a strong sense of substitution.
Seeing this scene, it seems that there is a piece of wood stuck in the throat, which makes people feel uncomfortable, and always think of ways to vomit it out.
Sad for Arjun's death, but also for Qiao Feng's heartache.
It was said that the horses outside the Saiwai herding sheep, the result was that the yin and yang were separated, and this kind of grief, Hu Jun did not perform.
Huang Rihua's interpretation makes people immersed in the scene, how can this kind of substitution acting skills be disliked?
From the moment he accidentally killed Arjun, Qiao Feng has been lost and depressed, and the expression of life is better than death, and Huang Rihua interprets it perfectly.
Hu Jun did not perform this feeling, whether it is acting skills or script problems, we do not know.
But judging from the apricot forest and the wrongful killing of Arjun, Huang Rihua is even better.
Since it is a martial arts drama, then there must be a hero who must have a martial art, what is martial? It's a martial arts action, it's a one-move move.
The martial arts dramas of Hu Jun's version and Huang Rihua can be said to have their own advantages. In terms of special effects, it seems that the Hu Jun version has the upper hand, but in fact, the "color" special effects of the Huang Rihua version are more attractive.
Many people ridicule Huang Rihua's version of the special effects as 5 cents of special effects, but under careful consideration, such special effects are the most real, and the sense of blow across the screen is not available in every martial arts drama.
The 97 version of "Tianlong" and Wu Qihua's version of "Leaning Heaven" are all such color special effects.
It just so happens that the special effects of Hu Jun and Su Youpeng's version of "Tianlong" and "Yitian" are "Water Waves".
In contrast, the special effects of color and water waves, the former has a stronger sense of substitution, and has a kind of blowing force, which is irreplaceable.
Deeper down, this is the trajectory. It can make the audience see more clearly, and it is colorful and beautiful.
Regardless of the special effects, who is better in martial arts action, everyone has their own answer in their hearts.
Hu Jun's version of the martial arts instructors are Zhao Jian and Yuan Bin, these two action directors are extremely powerful.
Huang Rihua's version of the martial arts finger is Guo Zhenfeng, a member of Zhang Che's "fierce generals" who had cooperated with Yuan Heping.
The 97 version of "Tianlong", the first episode began with a 10-minute fight scene for 40 days, such a meticulous polishing, only to have a future classic.
In terms of clothing, it will also affect the look and feel. For example, the 97 version of Xiao Yuanshan and Murong Bo, the black clothes of these two people, are really handsome.
Such a costume makes people have an immersive feeling, in other words, Huang Rihua's version of the fight is more jianghu flavor.
Hu Jun's version of the fight is very masculine, quite like the martial arts master Liu Renyang. It belongs to the white knife in, the red knife out.
If you strictly require Hu Jun's version of the play, there will be slight flaws, and overall the flaws are not hidden, compared with Huang Rihua's version, the shortcomings are jianghu atmosphere.
Not only the martial arts action, but also the changes in the action of the characters when they speak their lines, are also different.
Huang Rihua's version of micro-expressions, as well as various movements, are matched with emotions and look natural.
This kind of detail is a very test of the actor's skill, after all, this is not a person to do it can sit back and relax, but everyone's actions will affect the quality of the whole play.
The so-called nine-story platform begins with tired soil. No matter how well an actor moves, he can't support dozens of episodes.
Careful observation, the 97 version of The Void Bamboo, Ding Chunqiu, Jiu Mozhi, Tianshan Tongmao, Unfair Daoist, and Wu Laoda all combine actions and lines.
Even the monks of the Shaolin Temple who watched the vegetable garden also played the role, and it should be known that this is a very rare supporting role.
The 03 version of "Tianlong" restores the big scene and the original work in place, and on the big scene alone, the 97 version is even less inferior.
It's just that there is an adaptation of the Huang Rihua version, which I personally think is very good, that is, Hatsuma Zhi and Qiao Feng fighting.
Qiao Feng in the original work did not fight with Hatsuma Zhi at all, and the reader expressed regret, because of the million-word masterpiece, the two masters did not meet and compete, which was puzzling.
However, in the 97th edition of "Tianlong Eight Parts", Qiao Feng and Hatsuma Zhi had a big battle, which was to fill this "gap".
Huang Rihua's Qiao Feng was both chivalrous and domineering, Hu Jun's Qiao Feng chivalry failed to show it, and his Xiao Feng had a different flavor.
More than 100,000 people commented on Hu Jun's version of "Tianlong Babu", scoring 8.5 points, and Huang Rihua's version had more than 150,000 comments, up to 9.0 points.
The 0.5-point gap may seem small, but the gap does exist.
Although in some aspects of the shooting, Hu Jun's version is stronger, but when it comes to the overall and overall control, Huang Rihua's "Tianlong" wins.
These two versions are the memories of countless people's youth, and although they have shortcomings, they are irreplaceable.
Because, it is youth, it is the companionship of a lifetime.