laitimes

The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans

author:True History War History National History

The Mamluk army, which had repeatedly defeated the Crusaders and mongols (12th to early 14th centuries), consisted of Turks. Stop pretending that the Mamluks were white Europeans.

After distinguishing between the Turkic and Turkic peoples, not only domestic scholars but also foreign scholars also pointed out that the Mamluk army at the time of the many total victories over the Crusaders and Mongols (the twelfth century and the beginning of the fourteenth century) was composed of Turks.

References: The mamluks 1250-1517, Rasht's Collected Histories, and Reuven Amitai's Mongols and Mamluks all point out that the Mamluk army at the time of the many great victories over the Crusaders and Mongols (12th and early 14th centuries) was composed of Turks. Even the book "Three Thousand Years of Jerusalem", which is worshipped as truth, records that the Mamluk army at the time of the many great victories over the Crusaders and mongols (from the twelfth century to the beginning of the fourteenth century) was composed of Turks, and the Mamluks discriminated against the Arabs... It is also recorded that Timur the Great was a Turk... Y so-and-so smoked himself and beat up y so-and-so.

If they are not Turkic, then it is equivalent to saying that the Turks assimilated alien races thousands of miles away as Turkic, which is a strong anti-heaven, which is equivalent to saying that the Turks are the strongest people in the world. To say that they are not Turks, is to say that the Turks are the strongest people of time?

The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans
The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans
The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans

The Mamluk paintings were Turkic, not white European

Resources:

1. Medieval oil painting "Battle of Harding"

2. Portrait of a Memlook Bey, the original description of this painting indicates that this is a self-portrait by the British painter John Frederick Lewis. Not a Mamluk portrait. Mamluk in English is Mamluk, not Memlook. Only the three ignorant y so-and-so mistakenly regarded this as a Mamluk portrait.

3. Napoleon's Mamelukes

The battle parade and portrait paintings of the Battle of Harding are clearly visible, the Mamluks are full of Turkic soldiers, the background is Wang Saladin after the "Battle of Harding" victory, accepted the crusader surrender ceremony, standing next to the original Mamluks, high nose bridge and deep eye sockets, eagle jaws and mustaches, and light brown and reddish brown skin, which is a Turkic characteristic, most of which come from the Turks who invaded the steppes of southern Russia earlier and the Caucasus. Not a white Europa.

Before the westward migration, the Turks already had both Caucasian and yellow characteristics, and were divided into Turan races by academic circles. The Turkic ancestor Turan race already had both caucasian and yellow traits in B.C.

And y so-and-so mistakenly took the second picture and impersonated a Mamluk portrait. However, the fact that the second picture is not a Mamluk portrait.

The second picture is really "Portrait of a Memlook Bey", not "Mamluk Portrait". Mamluk in English is Mamluk, not Memlook. Only the three ignorant y so-and-so mistakenly regarded this as a Mamluk portrait. If you are blind, you can see the difference between Mamluk and Memlook. (y So-and-so thinks that English words look like they must have the same meaning?) That rip and rape still look like, but y so-and-so by rape and ripe meaning is completely different)

The second painting, Portrait of a Memlook Bey, translated as Portrait of Bey in Monroque. Bey "bey" belongs to the Turkic name, dating back to the Old Turkic script on the Orkhon Stele.

The original description of the famous painting "Portrait of a Memlook Bey" states that this painting is a self-portrait signed with initials and dated J F L 1863 (1863), that is, the author Lewis added his face with a beard, carrying a Turkic machete on his shoulder, wearing a Turkic embroidered turban... It can be seen that no matter what the people in this famous painting "Portrait of a Memlook Bey" look like, it cannot be denied that the Mamluk army in the twelfth and early fourteenth centuries was Turkic.

Napoleon's Mamelukes painting is equally clear that the Mamluks are Turkic military armies, Osprey Publishing Company's military book Heavy Cavalry Series No. 429, originally written by Ronald Polly and illustrated by Patrice Qusser.

Taking a step back, even if the Mamlukri of the Napoleonic era had whites, it could not be denied that the Mamluks were made up of Turks at the time of the many total victories over the Crusaders and mongols, when they were in the twelfth and early fourteenth centuries. (Because the Ottomans cut off the Mamluks' Turkic military resources in the fourteenth century, the Mamluks could only recruit Circassians, resulting in the main body of the Mamluk army changing from Turkic to Celkh.) The Mamluks even recruited blacks to join.

The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans

The picture above is also a painting of Napoleon's Mamelukes, and Napoleon's Mamluk cavalry even had blacks in it.

According to the logic of y so-and-so, y so-and-so is to say that the Mamluks are black military armed. It can be seen that y so-and-so is insane and needs to be hospitalized.

In fact, Napoleon's Mamelukes paintings are not at all the Mamluks of the crusaders and Mongols, but the Mamluks of Napoleon's army in the nineteenth century, and there are many pictures in the whole set, both Turkic, white and black. This painting depicts the Mamluks mixed with whites and blacks from the mid-fourteenth to the nineteenth centuries, and it is impossible to deny that the Mamluk army was Turkic when the Crusaders and Mongols were defeated (from the twelfth century to the beginning of the fourteenth century).

The mamluk dynasty (Bebhiri dynasty) had a special dualistic structure: the rulers and the Mamluk army were mainly Turkic, while the vast majority of the Egyptian population ruled by them were not Turkic.

The vast majority of the population of the modern Republic of Egypt is not descended from the Mamluks. Therefore, y so-and-so took the population survey of the Republic of Egypt in 1978, the nation to fantasize that the Mamluks were not Turkic, which was ridiculously wrong. y So-and-so behaves like saying that 95% of Haiti is now black and that ancient Haitian Indians were black, not Indians.

In fact, according to the 1978 Census of the Republic of Egypt, more than 98.8% of the Egyptian population is not descended from the Mamluks. The ancient Egyptian civilization in history The ancient Egyptians were not Arabs. After the demise of the ancient Egyptians and ancient Egyptian civilization, "Egyptian Arabs" appeared. Ancient Egyptian civilization was not Islamic.

References - The Egyptians

The Mamluks adhered to turkic supremacy and not white supremacy

Not only that, but most of the Mamluk leaders came from the Turks who invaded the southern Russian steppe, including Turkic soldiers, Caucasian Turkic soldiers (descendants of the Turks who invaded the Caucasus) and Chincha soldiers (Uzbekistan - an internal branch of the Turks), and as the number of Turkic soldiers increased, they eventually monopolized power. The first Mamluk dynasty, known as the Beheli Dynasty (Turkic), was a military armed force ruled by Turkic warriors.

References – The Mamluk Dynasty

In the fourteenth century, the Ottoman Empire cut off the Turkic sources of mamluks, and the Mamluks instead recruited Cherks in large numbers, resulting in a rapid increase in the proportion of Circassians, and in 1382, the Circassians usurped the Mamluk (Beheli) dynasty and began the Second Mamluk Dynasty, known as the Burji Dynasty (Circass). However, the Circassians are still not Slavs.

References – The Mamluk Dynasty

And y so-and-so low to break the lower limit of the forged Mamluk is mostly Slavs, really laugh off the teeth. The truth, however, is that not only are Turks, Chincha, and Uzbeks not Slavs, but the Circassians are not Slavs.

The rulers of the early Mamluk dynasty (Bebhiri dynasty) and the mamluk army were mostly Turkic, Turkic fighting peoples, and the mamluk rulers of the late Mamluk dynasty (Burji dynasty) were mostly Circus, not Slavs.

What is even more cruel is that Y so-and-so claims that Chincha and Uzbekistan are of the same ethnic group, but pretends that Uzbekistan is not Turkic. However, the historian's book A History of Afghanistan states that the Uzbeks were Turkic and that Timur the Great was Turkic.

References - Shaista Wahab and Barry Yangeman, History of Afghanistan

History of Afghanistan: "Tamerlane's loyal soldiers were Uzbek Turks, and Uzbek Turks formed the nucleus of Timurid's legions..."

In fact, the Mamluk dynasty adhered to the supremacy of Turks, and those in power were extremely disgusted with the European Slavs, and the Turkic warriors and Chincha warriors (Uzbek within the Turks) had participated in the genocidal war against the European Slavs, and it was the enemy of the European Slavs who did not share heaven.

Since the Turks began to move west in 745, for hundreds of years, Chincha (an internal branch of the Turks - Uzbekistan) enthusiastically joined the Turkic expeditionary army, dispatched to south Russia to fight, became the vanguard of the Turks, in the hundreds of years of Turkic invasion of the west, pursued turkic supremacy, carried out a horrific genocide against the Slavs in the south Russian steppe and the Caucasus, advocated leaving no one, because the Turks hated the Europeans Slavs very much, and also formulated a "transfiguration plan" in an attempt to completely occupy Europe.

Turkic warriors (Mamluks, Seljuks, Zangi, Nurdin, Timur, Ottoman, Chincha-Uzbekistan...). It was the Slavs and the white Europa who did not share the same enemy of heaven, who pursued Turkic supremacy, and in the centuries of Turkic western invasions, carried out a horrific genocide massacre against the Slavs and white Europeans in south Russia, Anatolia, and some parts of Europe, advocating leaving no one in the land, because the Turks hated the Europeans Slavs very much, they also formulated a "transfiguration plan" in an attempt to completely occupy Europe.

The historian Finlay records: "In order to turn themselves into masters of the conquered regions, the Turks adopted a plan to exterminate the indigenous population and make the area easier for the Turks to occupy..." – the Turkic massacre of West Asia and Europe

The historian Laurent recorded: "After the Turks passed, the destruction of the ruins left behind by them was unimaginable. Where they reached, there would be no more living people" – the Turkic massacre of West Asia and Europe

Historian Laurent records that "the native inhabitants were killed by the Turks" – the Turkic massacres of West Asia and Europe

The Mamluk Turkic chief Baibers wrote to the Europeans: "Tell you what we have all done, the dead are piled up, you should have seen your opponents step into the palace where you gathered to celebrate, cut the throat of the monks on the altar, and the fire engulfed your palace, if you see all this, you will wish you had never lived" - "Three Thousand Years of Jerusalem"

The Turks penetrated deep into Europe for hundreds of years, massacred, and left many Turkic people to breed in Europe, and later, the Turks weakened and withdrew from Europe, and many of the Turks who remained in Europe were assimilated into Europeans by European culture, resulting in many Europeans with Turkic ancestry.

(And according to the logic of y so-and-so, it should be said here that there should be a strict division between "Europeans" and "European-speaking peoples", which are actually two different groups.) Slavs are European-speaking peoples, not Europeans, with the Asian race North Asian type as the main body, mixed with a small number of European ethnic components, Eastern ancestry accounts for 97.7%, Western ancestry accounts for only 2.3%, the current world's qualitative Slavic ethnic group for the Eastern race, and the Western nation Celtic does not have much to do with. And according to the logic of y so-and-so, here to say: the mixed descendants of the Eastern race and the White Europa will inherit the patrilineal physical characteristics, and the Slavic warriors are generally Turkic, which just proves that the Slavs are descendants of the Turkic conquerors, the product of the Turkic invasion of the West, and the European blood comes from the European matriarchal line. y so-and-so most like the spiritual victory method, confusing the white as the father, can not distinguish the difference between European language peoples and Europeans, the first Russian Tsarist Dynasty was established as white, in fact, the difference between the two is very large, Slavic warriors are 97.7% of the purity of blood Turkic, adhere to Turkic supremacy, once participated in the genocide of Westerners. A Mamluk, ruled by Turkic soldiers, advocating ultra-nationalism, how could it be a Western nation. )

And y so-and-so completely forged "The Mamluk dynasty pursued white supremacy..."

The truth, however, is that the Mamluk dynasty adhered to Turkic supremacy and not white supremacy. The Turks in power, Chincha (Chincha and Uzbekistan are both internal Turkic branches), were not white.

Turkic, Chincha, and Uzbek are all Turan races, whose ancestors had both Caucasian and Yellow traits in BC. The Turan race is neither caucasian nor yellow. The Turan race is a transitional form between the white and yellow races. — Reference: Turan race

If you follow the white supremacy that y said... The Nammluks, Chincha, and Uzbekistan must slaughter themselves first. It can be seen that y so-and-so is completely counterfeiting.

The fact is that the Westward Migration turks included ottomans, Timurid the Great, Mamluks, Zangi, Nurdin, Chincha, Uzbekistan, Delhi Sultan...

The westward migration of the Turks posed a far greater threat to Europe than the Mongols. The westward turks invaded Europe and conquered Europe on a much larger scale than the Mongols. The westward migration of the Turks suppressed Europe far longer than the Mongols.

The Ottoman Turks alone had been invading and suppressing Europe for more than 300 years. According to the depth of the Ottoman Turkic invasion and the degree of repression, the Mongols were unable to suppress Europe at all.

y So-and-so wants to pull ottomans, Timurid the Great, Mamluks, Zangi, Nurdin, Chincha, Uzbekistan, Delhi Sultan, etc. are not Turkic? The truth, however, is that they all belong to the Turks. If they are not Turkic, then it is equivalent to saying that the Turks assimilated alien races thousands of miles away as Turkic, which is what the strongest people in the world can do. Is y So-and-so saying that the Turks are the strongest people in the world?

The Turkic peoples and turks were strictly divided and distinguished, and the Mamluks (12th to the 14th century to the beginning of the 14th century), Chincha and Uzbekistan were still Turkic, and the Ottomans, Timur the Great, Mamluks, Zangi, Nurdin, and Delhi Sultans were still Turkic.

Zan Tao's "Modern State and Ethnic Construction" states that there should be a strict division between "Turkic peoples" and "Turkic language peoples", which are actually two different groups. Even with such a strict division, the Mamluks were still Turkic.

The "Turkic" and "Turkic-speaking peoples" are strictly divided, and for the Mamluk army at the time of the total victory over the Crusaders and mongols, the expert works "Mamluk Dynasty 1250-1517", Rasht's "History Collection", Reuven Amitai's "Mongolia and Mamluks", and "Three Thousand Years of Jerusalem" are all considered Turkic.

Chincha warriors (Uzbekistan) are Turkic peoples, not only Turkic-speaking peoples, but Turkic peoples, with the Turan race Turkic race as the main body, Turkic ancestry accounts for more than 98.6%, the current world's qualitative Uzbek people for the Turan race, not Europa white race, and european white ethnic Slavs do not have much to do with the European white ethnic group Slavic.

And y so-and-so completely forged the Chincha warriors (Uzbekistan) "white blood accounted for 97.7%, Oriental blood accounted for only 2.3%, characterized as Europa white race ..." However, the fact is, first of all, y so-and-so said that the proportion of white blood and oriental blood is completely wrong, forged. Secondly, the white and Eastern bloods of Uzbekistan, regardless of the proportion, are basically from the Turks and belong to the Turkic descendants. Because the Turkic ancestor Turan race carried these bloodlines in BC.

At present, the qualitative Uzbek (Chincha) peoples in the world belong to the Turan race, not the Europa white race. The Turan race is neither a White Europa nor a Yellow race. The Turan race is a transitional form between the white and yellow races. — Reference: Turan race

y So-and-so is extremely ignorant to compare white blood with Eastern blood. However, the fact is that scholars archaeological genetic testing found that there were already many white bones in the ancient tombs of East Asia and North Asia in the Shang and Zhou Dynasties, and during the Shang and Zhou Dynasties, there were already a large number of White European races in the East, and the Oriental blood already included white and yellow blood.

To compare, it is also the white blood and yellow blood ratio, the Western blood and the Eastern blood ratio, the yellow race and europa white race comparison, the Western race and the Eastern race comparison. Instead of the white blood versus the Oriental bloodline, the Oriental race contrasts with the Europa white race.

Many of the Tsars were of Eastern ancestry and were therefore hostile to the Europeans. The European proverb "tear open a Slav, inside is an Oriental".

In order to facilitate the rebuttal of y so-and-so, for the time being, y so-and-so is used to compare the Oriental race with the Europa race.

Mixed descendants of the Eastern and Europa White races inherit the physical characteristics of both the matrilineal and paternal races. However, y so-and-so is completely obscene, forging the mixed descendants of oriental and European white races who will only inherit patrilineal physical characteristics. It can be seen that Y X completely fornicated and forged the false statement that "chincha warriors are generally mostly white, which just proves that Uzbekistan is a descendant of European conquerors, the product of the invasion of the East by Tsarist Russia, and the Tatar blood comes from the eastern matriarchy"

Moreover, taking a step back, even if according to the mixed descendants of the Eastern race and the white Europa race that y so-and-so thinks will only inherit patrilineal physical characteristics, then the fact is that the Chincha warriors are generally Turkic, and the Turks themselves have both caucasian and yellow characteristics, which just proves that Uzbekistan is a descendant of the Turkic conquerors, the product of the Turkic invasion of the West, the patrilineal blood comes from the Turks, the matrilineal blood is mostly from the Turks, and the very least amount comes from the Western matriarchal line.

The Turks penetrated, invaded, and suppressed Europe for hundreds of years, after which the Turks weakened themselves with many serious civil strife. Tsarist Russia rose, and Chincha (Uzbek Turks) could not defeat enemies such as the Ottoman Turks, so they joined Tsarist Russia. A large number of Chincha warriors enthusiastically joined the Russian Expeditionary Force and were dispatched to Siberia to fight, becoming the vanguard of Tsarist Russia. Since Chincha belonged to the Turkic people, belonged to the Turan race, was neither caucasian nor yellow, and did not pursue white supremacy, but was neither of the same race nor the different races of the yellow race of Siberia, it was not soft to kill the siberian natives.

According to y so-and-so claimed that Tsarist Russia carried out a horrific genocide against the Siberian natives, advocating that the land was left without leaving people, the following records prove that the men and women were killed, and no offspring were left, then Chincha (Uzbekistan) could only leave offspring with Chincha, so the patrilineal and matrilineal blood of Uzbekistan basically came from the ancestral Turks, not from these Siberian natives.

The following account shows that the eastern and western bloodlines of the Chincha (Uzbek) people are from the ancestral Turks, not from these Siberian natives encountered during the eastern invasion of Tsarist Russia.

The commander of the Amur Frontier, Grebsky, once said: "The Orientals in Russia are dealt with in the way of the Cossacks.". - The Great Massacre of the Sixty-Four Tuns in Jiangdong

"To eliminate the orientals that appear in the territory of the mainland, there is no need to ask for instructions" - the Great Massacre of the Sixty-four Tuns in Jiangdong

"The nomads of the East were ruthlessly and systematically eliminated by tens of thousands of Russian troops.". —Alexander Kerensky

"The greatest massacre, the greatest tragedy, the greatest sin"! —Shi Guang Zhenqing

"This inhumane practice now practised in Tsarist Russia can only be compared with the inquisitions that tried infidels in the Middle Ages." — Doic

"They killed and set fires, burned villages to death, drove ordinary people into the Heilongjiang River and drowned alive, shot and stabbed unarmed residents and their wives and children, and the Tsar's policy of the East was a crime" - Lenin

y So-and-so believes that the above records are that Tsarist Russia has carried out a horrific genocide against the indigenous Orientals of Siberia, advocating that there are no people left in the land, and the above words described in grebsky, Alexander Kerensky, Shi Guangzhenqing, Doić, and Lenin killed both men and women, that is, when Tsarist Russia invaded the East, the patrilineal and matrilineal lines of the Siberian natives were slaughtered and could not leave offspring. It is further proved that the patrilineal and matrilineal bloodlines of Chincha (Uzbekistan) are from the Turks, and its Western and Eastern bloodlines are from the Turks. After all, the Turkic ancestor Turan race had both Western and Eastern ancestry as early as BC.

It can be seen that the contents listed by Y so-and-so himself all prove that Y so-and-so forged false statements such as "Uzbekistan is a descendant of European conquerors, the product of the Tsarist invasion of the East, and the Tatar blood comes from the eastern matriarchy" and so on. The fact is that the Chincha warriors are generally Turkic, which just proves that Uzbekistan is a descendant of the Turkic conquerors, the product of the Turkic invasion of the West and the East, the patrilineal blood comes from the Turks, the matrilineal blood is mostly from the Turks, and the very small amount comes from the Western matriarchal line.

In addition, Tsarist Russia was established in the sixteenth century and then began to invade the east. However, y so-and-so forged the fifteenth century invasion of Tsarist Russia. y so-and-so is habitually fake.

Having distinguished between the Turkic and Turkic peoples, domestic and foreign scholars still argue that the Mamluk army was made up of Turks.

In the case of distinguishing between Turkic and Turkic peoples, foreign scholars' works "Mamluk Dynasty 1250-1517", Rasht's "History Collection", and Reuven Amitai's "Mongolia and Mamluks" all point out that the Mamluk army during the repeated great victories over the Crusaders and Mongols (12th and early 14th centuries) was composed of Turks.

Even the book "Three Thousand Years of Jerusalem", which is worshipped as truth, records that the Mamluk army at the time of the many great victories over the Crusaders and mongols (from the twelfth century to the beginning of the fourteenth century) was composed of Turks, and the Mamluks discriminated against the Arabs... It is also recorded that Timur the Great was a Turk... Y so-and-so smoked himself and beat up y so-and-so.

Y so-and-so is obscene and forged "Some domestic scholars like the spiritual victory method the most, indiscriminately recognize white people as fathers, and can't distinguish the difference between Turkic-speaking peoples and Turkic peoples..." However, in fact, it is y so-and-so who likes the spiritual victory law the most, and y so-and-so goes around saying that the ancestors are white, which is obviously that y so-and-so indiscriminately recognizes white people as fathers. y So-and-so could not distinguish between The Turkic-speaking peoples and the Turks, and mispronounced the Turks as not Turkic. In addition, other errors in y-so have been pointed out and refuted by the previous paragraphs of this paragraph.

In fact, it is y so-and-so who likes the spiritual victory method the most, indiscriminately recognizes white peoples as fathers, can not distinguish the difference between Turkic peoples and Turks, and treats the first Beheili dynasty (Turks) in Egypt as a european white, in fact, the two are very different, turkic Chincha warriors (Uzbekistan) are Turks with 98.6% blood purity, adhere to Turkic supremacy, do not pursue white supremacy, they have participated in the genocide of white Europeans and Slavs, a Mamluk ruled by Turkic soldiers, advocating ultra-nationalism, How could it be white Europeans.

Others say the truth and refute y so-and-so. y so-and-so framed others as Turkish, pan-Turanists. y so-and-so is really a rat,000,000 donkeys are poor, and they are about to die. In fact, none of the above mamluk, Chincha, Uzbek materials nor the writings of foreign scholars are from Turkey, nor are they pan-Turanists.

Some modern people who like to recognize white people as fathers, such as y so-and-so, mistakenly define European caucasians as Turan races, in fact, the two have nothing to do with each other, and are far apart. Some modern people who like to mistakenly recognize white people as fathers, such as y so-and-so, mistakenly define Turkic (Turan race) as white people, but in fact the two have nothing to do with each other and are far apart.

In fact, the Turkic and Chincha belong to the Turan race. The Turan race has had both white and yellow characteristics as early as B.C. The Turan race is neither caucasian nor yellow. The Turan race is a transitional form between the white and yellow races. — Reference: Turan race

Supplementary【1】

y so-and-so blows the Song, all dynasties except the Black Song.

The following is the logic of other dynasties according to Y so-and-so said: "Zhao Kuangyin Group is a black military armed group, don't imply that Zhao Kuangyin is Han Chinese."

The Mamluks were Turkic military armed forces, so stop pretending that others were white Europeans

Zhao Kuangyin's realistic portrait is of black African

Resources:

"Seated Portrait of Song Taizu", the author of the Song Dynasty painter Wang Yi, saw Zhao Kuangyin with his own eyes and painted realistic paintings according to Zhao Kuangyin's appearance.

"Seated Portrait of Song Taizu" can clearly be seen, Zhao Kuangyin is black, the background is Zhao Kuangyin stole the Later Zhou Jiangshan, after the beginning of the Song Dynasty, sitting is Zhao Kuangyin, flat face, collapsed nose bridge, and dark black skin, which is a black African characteristic, from sub-Saharan Africa.

According to the book "Slave Trade in the Medieval Islamic World", the Arab Empire captured and sold about 13 million slaves from Africa, including zhao kuangyin's ancestors, Zhao Kuangyin's ancestors were sold to the east, a few generations later Zhao Kuangyin was born, Zhao Kuangyin was sold to the Later Zhou, the Later Zhou Han people adhered to the supremacy of han people, treated foreign slaves very cruelly, and would castrate Zhao Kuangyin and sell or send them to the military camp for strict training. In the capital of the Later Zhou Dynasty, Kaifeng, the slave trade was very prosperous, and it was even possible to buy black Zhao Kuangyin here, and these castrated aliens had no descendants, thus avoiding the trouble of causing the impurity of Han chinese blood. None of Zhao Kuangyin's descendants were Zhao Kuangyin's own children.

The Chinese people and the surrounding Hu people know the ritual utensils of the ancestors in Huaxia, and only Zhao Kuangyin, a black man whose culture is very different from the Chinese culture, does not know. Zhao Kuangyin belonged to the black civilization.

Shi Zai "Taizu Chu and the Throne, Chao TaiMiao, see the Chen Dou Gui Gui, said: 'What is this?' 'The courtiers take the ceremonial vessel as the right. Taizu said, "My ancestors would rather know this!" 'The order is withdrawn. ”

Zhao Kuangyin song pursues black supremacy

Not only that, most of the leaders of the Zhao Kuangyin group are from Africa, most of whom are black soldiers in sub-Saharan Africa, and as the number of black soldiers increases, they eventually monopolize power. The first period of Zhao Kuangyin, known as the Song Dynasty, was a military armed force of a black dictatorship.

References - Zhao and Song Dynasties

The Zhao and Song dynasties adhered to the supremacy of blacks, and those in power were extremely disgusted with East Asians, and Zhao Kuangyin and his father had participated in the genocidal war against the Chinese peoples of East Asia, and they were the enemies of China.

After the Khitan annexed the Zhao and Song states, Zhao Kuangyin enthusiastically joined the Khitan Expeditionary Force and went to the south to fight, becoming the vanguard of the Khitans. During the southern invasion, he adhered to the supremacy of blacks, carried out a horrific genocide against the Chinese in the Central Plains and the south, advocated leaving no one in the land, and because Zhao Song was very disgusted with the Chinese, he also formulated the "Yellow and Black Plan" in an attempt to completely occupy China.

Song "The birth of the people is the time, I don't know why I am born" - Zhao Yi

The Zhao and Song dynasties carried out massacres in The Central Plains, Sichuan, and Jiangnan. When the Song people suppressed the Lahuaxia Uprising in Jiangnan, they wantonly burned and plundered, and the corpses of women without clothes were hung all over the 85-mile mountain forest... - The Song army slaughtered the Central Plains, Sichuan, and Jiangnan Massacre

"The women who were plundered escaped from the forest and hung in the forest were eighty-five miles from Tangyan and Shuling, facing each other in the valley" - when the Song army did not come, these large numbers of women did not commit suicide, the Song army came but tortured a large number of women committed suicide, and the corpses without clothes were hung all over the 85-mile mountain forest, which was obviously the Song army's evil deeds but planted stolen goods for the rebel army. In fact, the atrocities of the Song Army forced a large number of women to commit suicide.

The Chinese peasant uprisings in the Song Dynasty were extremely frequent, 203 occurred in the 160 years of the Northern Song Dynasty alone, and the frequent Chinese peasant uprisings in the Song Dynasty were rare in other dynasties - "Compilation of Historical Materials of the Peasant Wars of the Two Song Dynasties"

If it were not for the emergence of the Jin Dynasty to destroy the Northern Song Dynasty, then the Northern Song Dynasty would inevitably be overthrown by the Chinese peasant revolt - Deng Guangming

The title "two-legged sheep" did not first appear in Wuhu, but in the Zhao Song Dynasty, which was invented by the Zhao Song to call the Chinese people. "The old and thin man is called the rao of the fire, the woman is not envious of the name of the sheep, the child is called and the bone is rotten, and the eyes are two-legged sheep" - Zhuang Qi

According to the logic of y so-and-so, the Chinese nation is not Han Chinese,

According to Zan Tao's book "Modern State and Ethnic Construction", a logic expert of y so-and-so, it is pointed out that "Han Chinese" and "Chinese people" should be strictly divided, which are actually two different groups.

Zhao Kuangyin Group is a Chinese ethnic group not a Han Chinese, with the Negro race as the main body, mixed with a small number of Mongolian ethnic components, still belongs to the Negro race, black blood accounts for 97.7%, Oriental blood accounts for only 2.3%, the current world is characterized as the Negro black race, and the Oriental ethnic Huaxia does not have much to do with it.

The mixed descendants of the Oriental race and the black African race will inherit the patrilineal physical characteristics, and the Zhao Kuangyin Group is generally dominated by black people, which just proves that the Zhao Kuangyin Group is a descendant of black people, and the black people are the products of Zhao Kuangyin's mother, and the Oriental blood comes from the Oriental matriarchal line.

Y so-and-so said: Some domestic scholars like the spiritual victory method the most, indiscriminately recognize black people as their fathers, can not distinguish the difference between the Chinese nation and the Han people, the first period of the Song Dynasty (Zhao Kuangyin) was established as a Karma person, in fact, the difference between the two is very large, Zhao Kuangyin Group is 97.7% of the African black people with a pure blood, adhering to the supremacy of blacks, having participated in the genocide of the Orientals, a Zhao Song ruled by black soldiers, advocating extreme nationalism, how can it be an Oriental ethnic group.

According to the logic of y so-and-so: someone mistakenly defines the black Zhao Kuangyin as a karma person, in fact, the two have nothing to do with each other, and they are far apart.

#打卡挑战局 #