Someone has been asking myself, Duncan and James have a higher history? For this problem, it can be said that looking at the two people's playing records, in fact, the two have played 36 times, Duncan has a great advantage, Duncan has won 21 times in 36 meetings, James has only won 15 times, James's personal data can be said to crush Duncan, he can play for 40 minutes per game, he can get 26 +8+6 data, and Duncan also has an average of 36 points per game and can win 18+11+2.5 data.
It can be said that the two have their own strengths, James's personal honor is nothing more than 4 FMVP 4 MVP, and Duncan also has 3 FNVP 2 MVP, it can be said that the two honors are not much different, although James has 13 a team, but Duncan is also not bad, there are also 15 best teams, it seems that Duncan is more powerful than James. So is this the case?
This means to say that the way of ranking can be roughly divided into three types: data, honor, and legend. There are a lot of data, which is more objective? In fact, they are not objective, different basic data cannot be directly converted, and most of the high-level is to see people and then adjust after being compiled. For example, Wei Shao mvp that year a lot of high-order data were exploded, in order to avoid Wei Shao becoming the first in history, some high-order data directly changed the calculation method.
But James data is very good, the basic data is 411, and some of the high-level data is tailored for him, after all, people have media companies. Most of those who support James' second-in-command are those who tend to be data-based heroes. The hardest honor is the championship, after all, the media can not affect this, the older generation of players are also directly talking about the number of champions. From this point of view, Russell is the first person in history. But considering that there were only 8 teams at that time, the difficulty of winning the championship was very low, and Russell's championship quality was still insufficient.
Duncan and James overlap most of their careers, with one more championship and a 2-1 head-on confrontation, and obviously Duncan is better. Other honors are now being mentioned more and more, MVP is the best in a single season, some years are not small controversies, a burst, a number of defenses and fmvp. Different people have different weights in their hearts. From a legendary point of view, Jordan is undoubtedly the first person in history. From this point of view, Duncan Kobe and even Curry are better than James, and one person and one city is really a plus. This is also why Lillard has not been honored to enter the official seventy-fifth year of history. I tend to rank them by legend, after all, I'm here to enjoy hero performances rather than to look at the data table.
In fact, anyone who has seen Duncan play know why Duncan has few personal honors. Really to fight hard power and achievement LeBron is indeed not as good as Duncan. Duncan is impeccable in every championship, and LeBron is indeed a choice greater than an effort. Don't forget that Al-Quds and Cleveland are small markets, while Miami and Los Angeles are completely different.
James and duncan and Curry, who are also in the top ten levels of history, the record of 2 people (only talking about the Finals) is unbearable, if it were not for Ray Allen's three-point record in 13 years and Irving's three-point record in 16 years, he would only have 2 rings, and these 2 are shrink rings, the opponents are Durant and Butler, not the top ten levels in history, so, the top ten level players in history, James can't beat one, in my heart James is the real top ten goalkeeper in history, and the eleventh in history is the most suitable position for him
This article belongs to the author's original, if there is plagiarism must be investigated!