Uh-uh, sister was rejected ah...
A while ago, Zhang Weili, who broke the hot search by beating Joanna, challenged the current champion Carla, and the result was Carla: Dabu
To tell the truth, when Zhang Weili defeated Joanna a while ago, the sheep had already been fried, and every day she was looking forward to her sister fighting the bull again...
This is good, until the end of the year the sheep have hope
The sense of female power represented by Zhang Weili directly makes "female strength" an absolute keyword.
By the way, look at my sister's muscles...
To tell the truth, the sheep are indeed shocked by this sense of power.
Because of the violence in Tangshan, everyone has been lamenting the absolute difference in the strength of men and women in recent times, and Zhang Weili's appearance is like a tranquilizer, letting everyone know that women are actually not weak.
However, some people say that Zhang Weili is just an isolated case.
Her sense of power can only give women a little psychological comfort at best, and it is of little use.
But the sheep want to say that although the strength of men and women is different, there is no need to be so depressed.
Look at this grandma
And!
In fact, in the 70s, there were heroines in Hubei, China, who killed the golden leopard in order to save people
And after the topic of Zhang Weili exploded, the sheep also carefully analyzed the difference in strength between men and women -
Is there really an absolute power gap between men and women?
The difference in strength between men and women was not so big at first
Sheep admits that from the perspective of modern people, the balance of power between most men and women is still very different.
However, if you carefully study some prehistoric data, you will find that in fact, the earliest prehistoric women are much stronger than today's women.
A few years ago, a study published in Science Advances showed that women who lived more than 7,000 years ago had a very powerful arm bone.
How powerful is that?
Even better than the current athletes.
In fact, before the survey was published, few scientists would pay attention to women's bones alone, but usually chose to compare male and female bones.
Human bone development is actually closely related to lifestyle changes.
But the more lethal point is that scientists often subconsciously ignore the reasons for the change in women.
In the history of human development, the bone changes in men are obvious.
But through the comparison between prehistoric women and modern women, it will be found that even if their leg strength does not change significantly, the arm strength is at least 10% higher than that of modern professional sports women, and it is even more exaggerated than ordinary women, 30% higher.
What does this mean?
It shows that the power of prehistoric women is greater than that of modern women, and it also shows that prehistoric humans are not the so-called women with baby males to support their families, and prehistoric women are also engaged in manual labor, such as -
"The load on a woman's arm bones caused by this repetitive movement of grinding flour with stones for several hours may be similar to the laborious back-and-forth swings of a boat."
But why didn't humans find out before?
In 1872, French scientists discovered a prehistoric human remains in northern Italy, and through the existing skeleton of the remains, it is shown that its owner had developed muscles and a large and strong body during his lifetime.
The funeral of the owner of the remains is also beautiful: the body is covered with red ochre, the headdress is also made of Mediterranean shellfish and more than 100 buck teeth.
On top of that, there are many hunting supplies in this tomb: such as two sharp stone knives.
Yes, the owner of the corpse was a woman.
But, for more than a hundred years since the remains were found, she has been considered a male presence.
Why?
Because scientists at that time were mostly men, and women were mostly confined to family life.
People take this hypothesis as fact because they are limited by the times in which they lived: in the 19th century world, men were the dominant socioeconomic group and women stayed at home.
So they will subconsciously think that the same is true of the social division of labor in the Paleolithic age: that is, only male hunters can promote social development, and even highly respected scientists can easily preconceived.
So when "strong muscles" and "hunting supplies" are in front of everyone, men become the only answer.
Seriously, what kind of rogue culture is this?
Although he understood, the sheep still couldn't help but get angry... Because of the preconceived notions of scientists, for many years people were interested in the power of prehistoric women one! Not! Place! Know!
Not only in Italy, but even in more distant American sites, women also bear important social responsibilities.
In Peru, the remains of a woman in her 20s are even stored next to 24 utensils, including all the tools for hunting and slaughtering beasts.
In prehistoric societies, men were not the only masters.
Women will also participate in hunting, slaughtering, farming and other activities, and today, tens of millions of years later, we can still find sports injuries from these female remains that can only be found when shooting sports.
It is precisely because prehistoric women are highly involved in social activities that they will have strong upper arm muscles.
From the comparison of the data given by British scientists, even if prehistoric women did not participate in sports activities, they still had a strong physique that enabled them to beat the top modern athletes.
If you can cross the next game, modern women are estimated to lose adults...
Are women really getting weaker?
Before comparing, we must first clarify a concept: what is the influence of human power?
Generally speaking, strength refers to muscle strength.
Why are men generally more powerful than women?
Quite simply, because men have a higher muscle content.
In terms of muscle content, humans really can't escape the innate effects.
Even during the prehistoric Homo sapiens period, women, although powerful, differed from men.
To put it bluntly: women are smaller and certainly have fewer muscles
Again, hormones affect people too much.
Estrogen allows women to accumulate fat in specific areas, such as the chest and buttocks; Androgens, on the other hand, promote protein synthesis, further increasing muscle levels in men.
This... Innately speaking, it is really incomparable.
So why are modern women so weak compared to prehistoric women?
There is only one reason: the more you live, the more you go back.
Don't get me wrong, society is certainly progressing, but women are not.
As mentioned above, 19th-century scientists had preconceived notions about the social division of labor between men and women in the Paleolithic Age, which led to a long period of belief that prehistoric women did not participate in hunting and did not have strong muscles.
Discrimination against feminine energy in the world has existed for a long time.
After the barbaric society, although women escaped from dangerous hunting, they were put on a layer of shackles: since the advent of the agricultural era, women have gradually begun to assume the responsibility of husbands and children.
Society began to be dominated by men.
And the little strength advantage that women accumulated in the barbaric era has also been gradually consumed, and can only follow genes.
Sheep said a more exaggerated conjecture, if prehistoric women and modern men fight, then half of the former wins.
In that era when they could "wrestle" with beasts of prey, women had more muscle strength than modern humans and cattle.
The more civilized the society, the weaker the strength of women.
Artificial filters for prehistoric women: survive; Female orientation in the agricultural era: Wen JingXian shu.
Under this social screening, few women will participate in manual labor, and the genetic differences between men and women themselves have gradually stabilized, and the image of "weak women" has begun to become the mainstream of the world.
So, are women "not saved"?
Not really.
Isn't Zhang Weili fierce enough?
As mentioned above, androgens promote protein synthesis and thus boost male muscle.
So, if women want to gain muscle, while reasonable fitness, appropriate protein supplementation.
As for how much protein should be consumed?
The way it is calculated is actually not very different, but it depends on the individual: if you can get enough protein from food, you don't need to drink high protein.
In addition, you can also find a coach for professional targeted training.
For example, cross squat exercise leg and hip strength, or consult a professional fitness teacher for chest, back, shoulder and other individual training...
Truth be told, in a civilized society, the disparity in the strength of men and women is mostly the result of genetic selection.
But didn't Zhang Weili defy the "laws of nature"?
Genes are hard to change, but individuals can give themselves unlimited possibilities.
Just like no one has ever thought that women can "fight" with beasts of prey, not even scientists support it.
But the truth is so unexpected.
Sisters remember that female power is given by themselves.
To create possibilities, to break the balance, whether it is a physical difference or a spiritual pursuit.