On June 17, the domestic operating system manufacturer Zhongke Fangde updated the operating system product line and released Fangde desktop operating system 5.0 and Fangde Mandarin Duck hot pot platform 8.0 series products.
Can you take a normal name? Mandarin duck hot pot sounds like making food production lines.
So a lot of windows sound good? Or is apple a name so vulgar that it can no longer be vulgar? Sounds good?
Android versions over the years have been food, just listen?
How did JAVA come about? Think of coffee? Coffee is nothing more than foreign tea, what is the premium?
Your family is not good, what is the foreign name? Did the kneecap let Pang Juan dig it up? So I can't stand up, can only kneel?
The domestic operating system is worth encouraging, and I hope to continue to refuel. In addition, as long as it is the X86 platform, the intellectual property rights are controlled by Intel and AMD, and making a system on the X86 platform is like attaching its own logo on Ford.
The better domestic system is Huawei's Hongmeng and China's Kirin operating system.
Hongmeng is completely the same grade system as Windows and Google's Android system, mainly used with smart consumer goods such as mobile phones and cars, Kirin operating system is open source Linux in the kernel, than Windows and Google's Android system in the self-developed kernel level is consistent, but the ecology is insufficient. The rest of the domestic operating systems are based on other existing kernels on the kernel, and autonomy is still insufficient.
This is mainly due to two defects, that is, the software and hardware still have to pay money to the United States. 1) Windows is not open source, you want to natively support Windows programs is estimated to be to pay Microsoft, first of all, full compatibility needs to get a lot of original internal technical documents, followed by no authorization may have legal problems. 2) It must run on the "domestic X86 hardware platform", that is, the Mega Core platform. Mega core CPU is based on AMD, and each one sold has to pay AMD. This road is not necessarily a very good way, one is that ordinary users have pirated Windows is estimated not many will use this, and the other is that it occupies the market share of the government to promote localization, and is a competitor of Loongson and other manufacturers. It's hard to say whether the Americans deliberately wanted us to go this way.
How did it work, and who used it?
Here's a measured version of the iron flow:
Let's start with WPS. Open a 200M document, seconds on, pull down is very smooth, without any sense of stuttering, the picture in the article is also instantly brushed out, search and replace function, also very smooth.
Let's look at the PPT. This is also the software often used by government agencies and companies, opening a 700-page PPT, but also seconds open, smooth operation, picture brushing are very fast.
Next is Excle, all said that the end of the universe is the establishment, now the economy is sluggish, the examination is very hot, we look at this 10,000 lines of civil servants job list, up and down are very smooth. Sorting by job code and screening for posts is quick.
------
If we want to achieve real growth, we must boldly admit which parts are borrowed from others and which parts are done by ourselves.
It is not shameful for latecomers to learn from the achievements of their predecessors, but they must not imply that the results of others are created by themselves, because all the cover-ups can only fool the layman.
Enterprises that do not respect the labor of others will not attract capable people to work for you.
Take Firefox as an example, which prohibits the use of graphics cards to decode video for the safety of users by default, which will cause high CPU usage, but after some settings, at the expense of some security, it is also possible to hard solve the video, and the CPU usage rate will be greatly reduced.
Why should we pursue the goal of being more efficient than native platforms in the initial stages?
The meaning of linux distribution is out-of-the-box + maintainable: what a command to install, if it fails, you don't have to wait for the upstream to repair it
The meaning of "redhat" or "suse".
If everyone is a Linux master, then you should use ARCH, Slackware, or even a bare core to grab it yourself. Obviously, it is not realistic to let the tellers in the office hall to tinker and recruit a Linux administrator for each neighborhood committee. Then the all-in-one machine + integration scheme is the right way, you need someone to do a variety of adaptation and construction (assembly) work, "installation system" is also a technical work.
For re-release sales from other distributions, this is fine (as long as it complies with the law), as long as you can play with it yourself.
Domestic operating system I only think that deepin has hope, now it should be called Tongxin.
Deepin is an operating system for ordinary users using the Linux kernel and Debian infrastructure. The GUN-based protocol can be freely used by people all over the world, and is free but not free. UOS is mainly for enterprise users. My understanding is that I don't know if it's right or wrong.
The appeal of Deepin is its app store, which provides easy access to a lot of software, from editing documents to social networking, to three-dimensional drawing to leisure and entertainment, and ordinary users can fully use the Deepin system, away from the Windows environment.
If the driver is provided by the chip manufacturer, it is not doing the product, but it is equivalent to doing oem work, which is working for the chip manufacturer. When chip manufacturers provide chips, they must provide interfaces, and equipment manufacturers develop drivers according to these enough.
The development drive cost is high, and it is not as terrible as you say, which may be that the equipment manufacturers are not willing to invest. Everyone engages in low-cost competition, the core technology relies on foreign countries, such enterprises can not make any money, and can not withstand the wind and waves.
Equipment that has been discontinued for many years, is it not scrapped? I really don't want to sell it in the second-hand market. Why should these outdated devices affect the promotion of domestic systems?
Most of the computer components and peripherals you see, the drivers are provided by the corresponding chip manufacturers. Even asus does not write its own motherboard chipset driver, does not write GPU drivers, and does not write network card sound card drivers. Complex points of components and peripherals, its driver involves a large number of hardware and firmware internal information, these things chip factories generally will not be external, including partners and downstream manufacturers announced, of course, downstream manufacturers are also happy to see this, they do not have so much money to feed a driver team.
Looking at the list of contributions to the Linux kernel, the vast majority of them are various computer chips and other chip manufacturers. You can hardly find a board manufacturer, so your imagination of writing drivers according to the interface is not valid. Nor is the core technology relying on foreign countries, and almost none of the board manufacturers at home and abroad write their own drive.
As for the products that have been discontinued, or even the products that have been discontinued for many years, why should they be used? You're clearly looking at productivity products with the eyes of the consumer. Windows is a productivity product that uses more ancient software and hardware than you can imagine. And these ancient software hardware can't stop for a day.
Domestic network cards with foreign chips can not develop their own Linux driver? Although printers such as Epson Canon are brands of the book, are they not all produced in China? If the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology stipulates that if the Linux driver is not provided, it will not be allowed to be listed for sale, and dare not provide it? The tax control disk IC card reader does not provide Linux drivers also because there is no regulation, not that they can't do it. Historical equipment can also be required to be provided by the manufacturer, and the appropriate fee can be charged.
A Linux system, through the transformation of the wine to simulate the Windows environment, with virtual machine simulation can not be called native running, the article is also written "like a native application to run", native and like the same as the native, but two concepts, Xiaobian mistakenly understand that it is native, take this title is not right.
You don't know, Windows actually stole Jobs's apple-not-yet-launched operating system, just a few days in advance to the market, two people for many years to fight for this.
When Bill visited Apple, Jobs showed off the Apple operating system to him, demonstrated to him, Bill Mao Zedong opened, the problem that had plagued him for many years was solved, he quickly organized people to tackle the problem after returning home, and held hands with IBM to quickly launch Windows to occupy the market.
There are really believers in this kind of market legend.
When Windows 1.0 came out, macs were sold for more than a year, not to mention the earlier Apple Lisa.
Windows 1.0 is essentially just a shell of a graphical interface on dos, which is very simple and ugly compared to System 1 (the name of mac's earliest operating system).
But Windows 2.0 is actually a milestone, and its advancedness is not only far more advanced than the operating system on the Mac, but also far ahead of the times. Windows 2.0 began to appear in a mode called windows/386, which is actually running below DOS (not above). First, the kernel of the system runs in the protection layer (ring 0), which prevents the application from tampering with the code and data of the operating system. Secondly, Windows/386 is essentially a hypervisor in nature, and yes, Windows 2.0 in '87 began using virtual machines. The real Windows 2.0 win16 program runs on a virtual machine, while each DOS program has its own separate virtual machine. Cooperative multitasking is used in win16 programs, while preemptive multitasking is used between virtual machines. In this way, it can run multiple DOS programs at the same time without conflicting with each other. Of course, because of the DOS program that requires HMM, it needs to be multitasking under the DPMI standard until Windows 3.x.
It's quite possible to write a book about this, but I'll start with that.