The Jazz out is puzzling, in fact, Conley's handling of the last attack is very headache.
Since Gobert was stuck in the basket, why didn't Conley let the sky throw it? Gobert's chances under the basket are not necessarily better than Conley's chances of holding the ball. I believe that people who have watched the game have such a feeling, and the birth of this phenomenon may not be so simple.
This shows that Gobert has lost the need to exist in the Jazz, and even Conley does not pass the ball to Gobert, which can only show that Gobert is now facing a very serious situation.
Tim Mac Mahon reported that Gobert had praised Devon Booker's defense, much to the annoyance of people in the Mitchell camp. This report has two flavors.
First, Gobert, as the best defender, is not satisfied with the team's current defense. Second, the Jazz formed gangs within themselves, and Gobert was isolated.
Gobert observed Booker's defense and thought that the Suns prided themselves on defense, a very correct point of view, and a pure basketball view. The Suns are one such team, and everyone on their outside is doing their best on the defensive end to help decompress the inside. With full defense, the Suns' offense also remained stable. Serious defense and full-time offense help the Suns become a better team.
Apparently, Gobert envied the sun for this.
But that would also mean doubting the status quo, which the Jazz certainly had, and Gobert was clearly looking to improve the team.
The problem with jazz's outside line is simply that the talent is too short and the vision is too high, the ceiling is too low and the desire is too large. Their offensive resilience is low, unable to face the opponent's adjustment, once the opponent has a strong desire to qualify and performance, the Jazz are easy to lose.
In addition, the Jazz's defense is basically Supported by Gobert, and the defense of the outside line is indeed relatively loose. When you see Brunson single-handedly disrupting the Jazz's entire team, you can see the Jazz's corrupt outside defense. They don't actually have too many excuses, because the lineup is very young, not like the Lakers, who are all veterans.
So the jazz's outside defense problem is basically a matter of attitude. The defensive problems caused by attitude are actually more offensive, especially for the best defensive players in the team.
The Jazz's system, especially the defensive system, is supported by Gobert alone, just like Davis supported the Lakers' defensive system in the previous two years. Big people support a system, often cause their own excessive consumption, if there is no help from the outside, they are likely to be injured, in the details of the situation is also easy to be passive, giving people a feeling of being completely defeated.
But Jazz didn't seem to care about that.
As the best defensive player in many years, Gobert has indeed not gotten his rightful position, which is really regrettable. The team said that it wanted to build a team with Mitchell, which would be equivalent to abandoning the recognition of Gobert's importance to the team, and may also trade Gobert. But the problem of building a team with Mitchell is really obvious.
Again, what are mitchell's outstanding strengths?
Within the range we've seen, Mitchell is not at the top of the league offensively, and defensive problems are more prominent. The Jazz lost in the end not because of defense, but precisely because the efficiency and level of the offense were not good enough. These issues are all about Mitchell and the future of Jazz.
Gobert still changes teams, considering the Lakers' winning intentions and lineup structure, Gobert is very suitable. Imagination is naturally good, but the reality is still a lot of obstacles, the two of them are unlikely to come together, but ending jazz's grievance career, for Gobert, it is always worth it.