In just over a month, the Tianji 9000 camp continues to grow, vivo X80 is undoubtedly a fierce general, with independent research and development of image chips at the same time, but also gives a very close price. Of course, the price of Tianji 9000 mobile phones is also relatively chaotic, the cheapest is less than 3,000 yuan, and the most expensive one is close to 7,000 yuan.
For consumers, equipped with the same chip, the price difference is nearly 4,000 yuan, which is the cost-effective choice? You know, the cost performance is not simply based on the price, the configuration is also very important. Because of this, when choosing a cost-effective Tianji 9000 mobile phone, many people have chosen the wrong one.
In terms of comprehensive hardware configuration and price, vivo X80 is the most cost-effective Tianji 9000 mobile phone. The reason for the selection is very simple, there are configurations that should be there, there are configurations that others do not have, and the price is the lowest.
Why is the Redmi K50 Pro not worth the cost performance?
It is undeniable that Redmi is an Internet mobile phone brand that focuses on cost performance. However, the price of the Redmi K50 Pro is very cheap, it is currently the cheapest Tianji 9000 mobile phone, and there is not much advantage in terms of configurability, except for the 2K screen, other configuration advantages are not prominent.
In addition to the 2K screen, the 120W fast charge and 5000mAh battery combination is full. In contrast, several other mobile phones are equipped with 80W wired fast charging as standard, and the difference in charging time between the two is only about a few minutes, which dilutes the advantages of 120W fast charging. What's more, the battery capacity of the other two Tianji 9000 mobile phones is smaller.
Look at the photo again, the rear 100 million pixel triple camera system, the parameters are very good. However, consumers have their own views on how the 100 million-pixel main camera performs in terms of photography. For most consumers, flagship mobile phones have no longer spelled pixels, but spelled the bottom and algorithm. In terms of imaging systems, the Redmi K50 Pro performs modestly.
Of course, in terms of details, stereo dual speakers, multi-function NFC and infrared remote control are standard. Compared with the other two mobile phones, this can only be said to be standard, not an advantage in hardware configuration.
Vivo X80 is a cost-effective Tianji 9000 mobile phone
In terms of price, as the entry-level version of vivo X80 pulled the price to the lowest, as long as 3699 yuan. Purely from the price point of view, X80 has no advantage, but there are many highlights in hardware configuration, which improves the cost performance of the product.
Specifically, the vivo X80 series is equipped with a Tianji 9000 chip as standard, and also uses a self-developed image chip V1+. Due to the relatively weak camera ability of MediaTek chips, only vivo is a domestic mobile phone manufacturer that has equipped Tianji 9000 mobile phones with independently developed image chips, which is technical strength.
Speaking of the screen, although it does not support 2K resolution, the Samsung E5 material is much better than the Samsung E4 material of the Redmi K50 Pro, especially in terms of image quality and clarity. In terms of photography, the rear triple camera, the main camera is Sony IMX866 sensor, is a 50 million pixel outsole sensor; The ultra-wide angle is the Sony IMX663. Mature Sony sensors, coupled with the self-developed V1+ chip and algorithm, the photo effect has been pulled full.
In terms of endurance, the combination of 4500mAh battery and 80W fast charge can be half charged in 11 minutes, and this speed can also be used, which is slower than the Redmi K50 Pro. Stereo dual speakers, better motors, that's all standard and a plus. Therefore, self-developed image chips, better photos and screens, hundreds of dollars are still very cost-effective.
Finally, oppo Find X5 Pro Tianji edition, hardware configuration has nothing to say, 2K screen, LTPO technology are used, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen1 version is almost no different. The difference is that the Tianji version does not use the self-developed Mariana chip, nor does it have The Hasselblad image blessing. Imagine spending more than 5,000 yuan to buy a flagship, but there is no self-developed chip, which is very embarrassing.
Purchase suggestion: In the three Tianji 9000 mobile phones released, the self-developed image chip V1+, Sony IMX866 sensor, which has improved the cost performance of vivo X80 mobile phones. In contrast, the cheap Redmi K50 Pro has a mediocre performance in addition to the 2K screen, while the OPPO Find X5 Pro is more like a hasty debut of the Tianji 9000 chip.