The sale of one plus ACE has attracted the attention of many netizens, and has also been blown to the sky by many media, and it is also known as the successor of OPPO ACE, looking forward to OnePlus to make ACE bigger and stronger. But if you compare a plus ACE to the real me GT Neo3, you may have a doubt, isn't this the real me GT Neo3 changed the shell?
There are doubts about normal, after all, a plus ACE and the real me GT Neo3 volume size is almost the same, the appearance design is very close, coupled with the same hardware configuration or similar, it is difficult not to think that a plus ACE is a matryoshka doll real me GT Neo3.
First of all, these two mobile phones are equipped with MediaTek Tianji 8100 + LPDDR5 memory + UFS3.1 flash memory, both of which are designed with independent chips. Some people may say that a plus ACE uses a customized version of the Tianji 8100-MAX, which has greatly improved the game frame rate stability, AI computing power and night scene video noise reduction capabilities, and the performance is higher than that of the real gt gt neo3, which sounds like some truth, but how big is the overall performance improvement? Aren't the MAIN frequencies of the Tianji 8100-MAX and Tianji 8100 both 2918MHz? No overclocking was seen, and the improvement in the stability of the game's frame rate was only achieved through algorithmic interpolation. Instead of focusing on the difference in the name, it is better to turn to the thermal design. The VC heat dissipation area of these two mobile phones is the same, both are 4129.8mm, the difference is that the total heat dissipation area of the True My GT Neo3 can reach 39606 mm, while the total heat dissipation area of the OnePlus ACE can reach 35198.2mm.
Secondly, in terms of screen, these two mobile phones use a 6.7-inch 120Hz flexible OLED direct screen, the screen resolution is 2412×1080 pixels, both support 720Hz touch sampling rate, if there is a difference, it should be a plus ACE screen from BOE, and the true self GT Neo3 from Pegasus.
Finally, in terms of cameras, both phones have a front-facing 16-megapixel camera, a rear 50-megapixel main camera + an 8-megapixel ultra-wide-angle lens + a 2-megapixel macro lens, and the main camera sensor is IMX766, which supports OIS optical image stabilization, and there is not much difference in hardware configuration and imaging performance.
In addition, one plus ACE and true my GT Neo3 both support 150W super flash charge, both built-in 4500mAh large battery, both using X-axis linear motor design and dual linear speakers.
Having said all that, would you like to spend more money on a shelled version of the real me GT Neo3?