Recently, James' former teammate Jefferson, when participating in online interaction with netizens, was asked about the contrast between James and Curry.
Some netizens asked: "LeBron (James) or Stephen (Curry), and which one of them feels better as a teammate?" ”
Jefferson replied: "Oh, LeBron, because I won a championship with him. Stephen was of course much kinder. I always have small concerns that if I don't perform well, then LeBron will trade me, which is the real thing (note: Jefferson was traded by the Cavaliers). But with Stephen, you'll never worry about Stephen being the manager. ”
Jefferson's answer made me confused for a moment what kind of attitude he really had toward James. However, from Jefferson's words, several layers of meaning can be seen.
The first is that it is relatively easy to follow James to win the championship. For those players who have achieved fame and are only close to the championship, if you don't care about anything, just to win a championship, then it is easier to achieve your life dream with James as a teammate.
The second is that James and Curry lead the team in different styles. On James's side, you have to make your own contribution, because if you don't perform as expected, then "LeBron will trade me." Curry will be much kinder in this regard.
Finally, James should be very deeply involved in the operation of the team, while Curry will not participate in the operation of the players. Of course, Jefferson said not to worry about Curry being the manager at the same time, I think there are two possibilities. The first is that Curry strictly adheres to his duty as a player and will not take the initiative to participate in the operation of the team, or do some cooperation work in the case of team leadership. The second scenario may be that Curry is on the Warriors and doesn't have the voice of James.
Do you think Curry belongs to the first kind of situation?