laitimes

Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380

The anxiety of the endurance of new energy vehicles has not been solved, so that it has become the biggest problem for volkswagens to buy new energy vehicles. As we all know, the NEDC comprehensive mileage advertised by car companies is a relatively ideal state, in fact, there will be a lot of loss, and even a direct reduction of half is also possible. Some car owners have calmly accepted this matter, and some car owners have used legal weapons to protect themselves.

Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380
Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380

A few days ago, the China Judgment Document Network disclosed a lawsuit between the owner and Tesla, but the result ended in the owner's defeat.

The owner repeatedly asked the sales staff when purchasing, and the other party also confirmed many times that the endurance was 480 kilometers, but when she charged the car for the first time, she found that the endurance was only 378 kilometers, and the number of 480 kilometers could not be seen at all.

Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380
Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380

When she asked the salesperson again, he changed his mind, saying that the vehicle could only actually travel 400 kilometers up and down, not the 480 kilometers that were determined.

Subsequently, the owner took Tesla to court, demanding to return the car and make triple compensation. But in the end, the lawsuit was lost.

Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380
Female car owners sue Tesla for one refund and three losses! The calibrated 480 actually has only 380

The court held that the evidence submitted by the owner of our car was insufficient to prove that Tesla Beijing Company and Tesla Tianjin Company deliberately informed the vehicle mileage of the vehicle when selling the vehicle involved in the case, or concealed the true situation, resulting in a false expression of intent. What do you think about that?

Read on