On April 8, Oscar officials made the latest decision on Will Smith's beating: barring him from attending all Oscar ceremonies and other academy events for a decade.
The decision of the little gold man who thought it would be confiscated was not waited for. The decision has undoubtedly set off another storm on the Internet.
Will Smith may have been the beginning of the oscar-winning reputation.
Some argue that the College's refusal to take back the award to him is a sign that it is a sign of violence and an tolerance for violence in such a public matter.
Admittedly, Will Smith is indeed a good actor, but the blatant violence has caused his people to collapse in public opinion.
In particular, as a joke that was the trigger of the event, he was very happy at first.
This is also why many people originally wanted to be on his side, but lacked basis.
Will Smith did not have the support of the American public.
The penalty of banning participation in the Oscars for a decade undoubtedly shows the organizers' inability to do anything about the incident and poor emergency response mechanisms. And from the official text, this only prohibits them from participating in the awards ceremony, and does not affect their nomination or even winning awards. This painless punishment decision is also doomed to the reputation of the award.
It's hard to imagine that another time later, the host, standing at the Oscars again, wouldn't be suspicious of people, including Will Smith. Perhaps, a decade later, the Oscars' reputation has been surpassed by other awards.