Wu Lei once again responded to the so-called "protective response" of a pseudo-football expert with a clever running position.
Wu Lei, who debuted in the 66th minute, scored again in La Liga after a gap of 666 days, scoring the 16th goal of his career in Liuyang. I don't know if it is a coincidence, Wu Lei's goal is closely related to the word "6".
After breaking the goal drought, Wu Lei could not hide his excitement, lost no time in sending flying kisses to the fans on the spot, and finally released the grievances and depressions he had accumulated for a long time.
In the 8th round of La Liga, the la Liga top scorer list has been rewritten this season: Wu Lei's goals have become 1, and Hazard's goals are still equal to 0. At this moment, the name of China's "King of Martial Arts" was once again remembered by Espanyol fans, who lined up to ask for his signature, which was too heartwarming.
However, on the other side of the ocean, in Wu Lei's homeland, a discussion about how forwards should run is in full swing - those who think that forwards should be inserted are scolded as "ball blind" by "the emperor who understands the ball" and is questioned about not understanding the ball.
It all starts with Yu Dabao's "walk" reception in the national football match (pictured below).
The debate was protracted, and those who supported Yu Dabao said that Dai Weijun was too greedy and should not carry too many balls. They also believe that Yu Dabao is doing a very good job, and slowly running in the back is doing "protective response".
What is Yu Dabao "protecting" by doing this? The "know the ball" did not say explicitly, perhaps to protect the opponent's goal, or maybe they just felt that not attacking was the best defense, or protecting their faces.
Some fans believe that if Yu Dabao is replaced by Wu Lei, this ball Wu Lei will definitely insert forward and respond with Dai Weijun.
Will Wu Lei be like this? The hypothesis does not hold, but this goal of Wu Lei last night (above) is well interpreted.
Wu Lei does not play cards according to the "routine", according to the "theory" of a certain understanding of the ball emperor, shouldn't the ball be withdrawn from the "protective response"?
Fast forward insertion is always the most threatening, the opponent's most feared way of attacking, if each of our strikers does the so-called "protective response" like Yu Dabao, then Wu Lei will not score this goal.
The neutral block is always running out, not slowly waiting in the back until the opponent is finished before attacking. If Wu Lei also ran up as slowly as Yu Dabao, he would definitely not have a chance to break the goal.
Falling behind is not terrible, as long as we learn with an open mind, find our shortcomings and correct them. However, some people are always making excuses for their own inadequacies, and they are more ridiculous and generous in inventing and creating specious views and words to mislead.
Wu Lei's goal is a good illustration of what is called a quick forward insertion, what is a "protective response", and together with his inventors should be thrown into the garbage can of history.
Chinese football does not need any "protective response", we need a kind of courage and determination to fight the opponent to the death on the field.