On the afternoon of April 3, the release of an apology statement from a Q&A platform user finally stopped the storm surrounding the Harry Potter mobile game for some time. The user made a lot of false statements on the platform, which attracted a lot of negative public opinion to the official Harry Potter mobile game. In his previous response, the user used a large number of graphics and text to accuse the Harry Potter mobile game of infringing on his personal design and plagiarizing his own ideas without authorization. The answer kept fermenting on the Internet, causing an uproar, and was only recently suspended with an apology statement he issued.
In the article, he made it clear that he was just a large number of popularity of the Harry Potter mobile game during the public beta, so he deliberately created an eye-catching topic to gain traffic. In the article, he fabricated his experience of working at NetEase, and complained that NetEase had plagiarized his ideas. The article contains a lot of content that distorts the facts, misleads the public, and discredits. After realizing the seriousness of the matter, the user issued this statement and said that he would bear the corresponding legal responsibility.
Personal statements aside, is there some legitimacy in the original author's answer? Around this point, in fact, some senior game planners have already expressed their views under the relevant questions, and almost all professionals can see that all professionals have expressed a scornful attitude towards the original answer. And the flag is clearly affirming that the content of the plan published by the player is distorted, and secondly, it is very obvious to apply the design of another game.
Realistically, this article is untenable in many places, and there are even players who break down the original answers and give their own negative views on each small paragraph. And in a very simple sentence to summarize the root cause of this incident: malicious touch porcelain, deceive people who have not done game design, deceive some public opinion and attention.
Thus, conspiracy theories are fundamentally untenable. Harry Potter mobile game as a classic IP adaptation of the game, in its own case of a large number of traffic blessings, as a game official will not be so "brainless" for their own black, and the innovation of Harry Potter mobile games in the game circle is obvious to all. It is precisely because of this that everyone has spontaneously promoted it after playing the wizarding world, which has today's heat. Although the cost of rumor-mongering is low, the consequences that need to be borne may be immeasurable.