Recently, a discussion around Harry Potter mobile games has sparked a very high degree of heat throughout the game circle. The cause of the incident was that a user answered questions about the Harry Potter mobile game on a Q&A platform, claimed to be the original author of the game at the beginning, and accused the pig farm of "stealing" the game planning ideas. The confrontational topic has caused heated discussion on the Internet in a short period of time.
However, with the emergence of an apology letter, the matter has re-entered the public eye. In the statement, he admitted that he had fabricated a lot of false information in the answer, including the self-proclaimed original author of the Harry Potter mobile game. Surprisingly, he admitted that publishing such an answer was only to rub the heat of the Harry Potter mobile game and publish controversial topics to attract attention.
Looking back at the development process of the previous events, the user spent a long time comparing the similarities between his own plan and the various modes of the Harry Potter mobile game, and further accused NetEase of official plagiarism. The full text uses a large number of pictures and text content to increase the credibility of your answers. I have to say that a lot of half-understanding onlookers, including Xiaobian, are also "half-convinced" after a rough browsing, after all, the reduction of Harry Potter mobile games is still online.
The editor continued to search for related topics and found that some game planning professional users on the platform conducted a professional analysis of the authenticity of the answer content. The highest praise of the answer is bloody, pointing out that the tirade in the original answer has nothing to do with the magical awakening of Harry Potter, and also copied the content of other game planning designs. With the fermentation of heat, the answer suffered from the "ruthless dismantling" of more professionals.
Fortunately, with the arrival of the apology letter, the rumors will naturally not be broken, and the rumor-mongers will also be punished by the Network as they deserve. I have to lament the low cost of online rumors today, but the way such evil deeds win traffic will inevitably be reversed.