laitimes

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

Is Milu right? Dong Lu is just the former national football coach. Recently, Milu stated that he did not understand what "protective response" was, so that the inventor of this term, Dong Lu, once again fell into the storm of public opinion. In the face of all kinds of doubts, Dong Lu once again "rose up" in response, believing that Milu did not understand the real scene at all, was Kane a mediocre striker?.

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

On the personal social platform, Dong Lu said that he did not want to talk about the "Yu Dabao Incident" again, but after a bar connected with Milu, someone pursued him without hesitation.

In this regard, he asked rhetorically: Who knows this connection, whether Milu only answered after watching the game screen? Dong Lu believes that if Milu has not seen the game picture, then what he said is "just a set of water words".

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

For Milu's view that a good striker should be closer to the goal, Dong Lu also refuted it. He cited Premier League star Kane as an example and choked back to Milu: "Kane's retracement assists show that he is a 'mediocre striker'? ”

It seems that Dong Lu still firmly believes that Yu Dabao is "protective reception" rather than walking, and still believes that Yu Dabao should not be inserted in front of the palace but waiting for Dai Weijun's return after the palace.

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

After leaving China, Milu has been paying attention to Chinese football, and I don't know if Milu has watched the game between the national football team and Saudi Arabia. If he had seen it, then this scene between Yu Dabao and Dai Weijun should have an impression.

Undoubtedly, Milu's views represent the mainstream of world football, but Dong Lu seized on the possible loophole of this online interview, that is, it may be just a network connection, whether the interviewer gave Milu a closer look at the game scene.

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

No wonder he questioned that Milu had seen the scene! Finally, Dong Lu wrote: "Don't be embarrassed for Milu anymore, he doesn't understand the real scene. ”

Does Milu really not understand this race scene? In order to avoid embarrassment, Dong Lu's conclusion was too arbitrary. You can question that Milu hasn't seen the scene, but what if the family did see this game clip in the connection?

In fact, Yu Dabao's approach is only one of the options that may appear in the game, and the return pass should not be impossible, but you can't spray people who think that Yu Dabao should insert "do not understand the ball", that is, "ball blindness".

Running is a multi-choice question not a single-choice question, not an either-or like diode. Either a roundabout or a direct front insertion can result in a goal break, but among these options, the front insertion is often the most threatening.

Dong Lu choked Milu: Kane's retraction assists showed that he was a 'mediocre striker'?

Now I question whether Milu has ever seen the scene of "Yu Dabao walking", and I don't know how Dong Lu will respond if Milu gives a positive reply! Hopefully, Milu will respond with a public video that will completely nail these pseudo-football experts to the column of shame.

Read on