Liu Chuanzhi once mentioned in Lenovo's internal speech that there are three kinds of mistakes in life as little as possible:
First, avoid making repetitive mistakes;
Second, avoid making low-level mistakes;
Third, avoid making fatal mistakes.
It is not terrible for enterprises to make mistakes, but to eat a long and wise, make mistakes, through the review of the long ability, and the lessons are shared in time to avoid making repeated mistakes. In this way, the tuition fees that are paid less are all profits.
What is a re-order
◆ Review can effectively deepen the impression of this game, but also can find out the loopholes between the attack and defense of both sides, is a good way to improve their own level. In the review, the thinking of the two sides constantly collides, constantly stimulating new solutions and new ideas. New thinking, new theories may sprout here.
To review is to re-"over" what has been done in the past in the mind. It guides us to solve problems and help us improve our abilities by reviewing, reflecting and exploring past thoughts and behaviors, finding causes and patterns. For the review, review, reflection, exploration, and improvement cannot be less.
The essence of the review is to "solve the problem"
The "associative" review is to examine the difference between "how the goal was set in the first place" and "the result made now", and then analyze the causes according to the differences, find solutions, and carry out follow-up actions.
Review = summary + deduction
Why review
To turn failure into wealth, success into ability
In order to know what it is and why it is so
Don't make the same mistake again
In order to pass on experience and enhance capabilities
To summarize the rules and landline flow
The hard logic of the review - the four-step method of the review
The steps of the review are a logically structured whole, i.e.:
Review the objectives Evaluate the results Analyze the causes summarize the rules
These four steps emphasize hard logic, must form a logical closed loop, around the formulation and achievement of the goal, evaluate the results against the goal, and then evaluate the focus of the lock review based on the results, and then analyze the reasons to find the key elements of success and the root cause of failure.
Through the analysis of the root causes, make targeted solutions, and then in a large number of actual battles, constantly explore and summarize the law, and form their own effective playing style.
Moreover, the laws summarized from actual combat experience can continue to support subsequent goal formulation and more effectively achieve results, so the review is a particularly strict logical whole.
First, the target outcome.
Recall what the original purpose or desired result is to note:
1. Distinguish the difference between the purpose and the goal, the purpose is why (why) to do this, and the goal is to do what kind of (what) result.
2. In addition to determining the purpose, it is best to identify the signs of a milestone in the quantifiable goal. Without quantifiable and assessable goals, it is difficult to ensure the realization of the purpose, and it is difficult to evaluate with the results!
3. The purpose and goal proposed in advance are not clear, and the follow-up is clear when reviewing, which is convenient for this comparison and improves the accuracy of the next target.
Second, evaluate the results.
Compare the original set goals to see how well they are being achieved. Points to note:
1. Set a good "seeking truth from facts" review atmosphere, compare the gap between the results and the goal, and find out the success (highlights)) and the improvement points (deficiencies), which is actually "defining the problem" in order to enter the third step of the review - "analyzing the reasons".
2, the definition of the problem needs to be clean and clear description of the difference between the "goal" and the "result", which does not include the cause and solution of the problem, let alone blame, complain and leave the responsibility.
3, highlights and deficiencies are equally important, can not weaken the highlights, too modest to be, ignore the real ability is more regrettable.
4. Introduce more external typical fact samples to make our results evaluation broader and the conclusions more objective
Third, analyze the causes.
Carefully analyze and analyze the key reasons for the success or failure of things. Note:
1. When analyzing success factors, list more objective factors and select real advantages to promote.
2. When analyzing the reasons for failure, dig deep into the causes (subjective reasons) from yourself, and pick up the shortcomings to make up for the shortcomings. This includes carefully examining whether the original self-determination and goal setting were obviously wrong before the failure, otherwise the cause analysis may revolve around the wrong purpose and goal, and the result will be half the work.
Fourth, summarize the law.
Summarize the experience, including the experience of gains and losses, and whether there is something regular to think about, as well as the next action plan. Points to note:
1. To sum up experience (laws), we should retreat as far as possible, seek broader guidance, and try not to be limited to discussing things as they are.
2． Summarize experience should be cautious, summarize the law should be more careful; We cannot carve a boat and seek a sword, and regard the understanding of the moment and the place as a law.
Five attitudes for review
Review the misunderstanding with 5
It's not --
Lie to yourself and prove yourself right
Flowing in form, going through the motions
Hold accountable and hold critical meetings
Emphasize objectivity and shirk responsibility
Simply draw conclusions and carve a sword
It's --
Focus on seeking truth from facts (seeking truth)
Focus on content and find reasons (truth-seeking)
Focus on improvement and improvement (study)
Focus on reflection and self-analysis (seeking internal)
The emphasis is on finding the essence and the law (seeking the tao)
Review how it landed
A concrete plan of action must be implemented and three recommendations considered
- What can I do now?
- What do I need to keep repeating?
- What should I stop or not do later?
### How to recognize the essence ###
Consider the following questions:
1) Controllable: Do you try to do the best? Is it at least not less than the planned goal?
2) Semi-controllable: Is the part of yourself that you can control done well? Is there room for the parts that someone else has done? Is it helping others as much as possible to get the job done?
3) Uncontrollable: Do you communicate with others in advance? Is there any urging? Are you always informed of how things are going? Is it possible to be partially involved in support? After such self-analysis, we can have a basic understanding of two aspects:
(1) What are the things that I have not done my best?
(2) What is the place where you have contributed to something that is uncontrollable or uncontrollable? What's not to focus on?
Then, we can explore these understandings, why this is so, how it can be, and then slowly have a view of the event that is close to the essence and law.