The conflict between Ukraine and Russia is arguably the hottest topic in the world since this period. Russia's military strength is obviously not comparable to Ukraine, and most of the legacy left by the Soviet Union to Ukraine in that year has been sold, and there is a feeling of "selling the field".
However, in any case, under the promotion of the Russian army, Ukraine lost its air supremacy and the ability to counterattack with strategic weapons in just one day, which shows the huge gap between the military strength of the two countries! And at this time, there are still some mercenaries who are massing and marching towards Ukraine?
ally? Fool you!
To say why Ukraine dares to brazenly provoke, it is actually its own group of good allies. Before the start of the conflict, we could see the leaders of NATO countries express their support for Ukraine almost every day, what we always stood with Ukraine, what NATO would provide all kinds of help to Ukraine, what the United States would help Ukraine to resist Russia together, and so on. These are all sweet words, so that the Ukrainian trance has a feeling of "backing up the mountain"!
But at the very moment of the beginning of the conflict, all the allies made their position clear, and all the aid they could provide was all that was aid except for sending troops. In other words, you still have to fight the battle yourself, guys we can provide some at our discretion!
This is completely amusing a fool, not to mention what kind of equipment can the United States provide to Ukraine, even if it provides Ukraine with an F-35, Ukraine does not have a qualified driver. Isn't that still a fool? Not to mention that most of the equipment given by the United States and its allies is post-10s. It may have been more than 10 years since it was produced, but does this weapon really not hurt itself on the battlefield?
Mercenaries called "Ukrainian Hope"?
In this case, Ukraine has publicly stated on social media that it currently hopes to be supported by mercenaries and is willing to pay mercenaries. After the news broke, the international community reacted differently. The first is the Attitude of the Western Countries, which do not prevent their own citizens from being called mercenaries on the battlefields of Ukraine, which is the attitude of the Western countries led by the United States and Britain.
However, many neutral countries, including those who watched the hilarity, said they could not understand why the conflict between the two countries required mercenaries to enter. Is Ukraine's defense already so inadequate? Speaking of mercenary wages, Ukraine itself is not economically developed and still owes a lot of foreign debt, can it really be waged to gather mercenaries at this time?
Finally, Russia also gave a strong dose. The Russian side said that according to the provisions of the Geneva Convention, it will not treat mercenaries as prisoners of war, and to put it bluntly, it will not be able to save their lives even if they surrender. As soon as this attitude came out, the first 16,000 mercenaries reported by Western media did not know how many more could actually reach Ukraine?
Part of the news comes from: Shangguan News