The second "Ding Taisheng"?
A "Chen Qingqing" entry was on the hot search
After combing through, it turned out that the thing was like this:
It all started with those two contrasting photos
Chen Qingqing pretended to be a foreigner on the Internet to question the comparison of the two photos and commented on the matter
Subsequently, his own screenshot was transferred to China, and he criticized it again as Chen Qingqing
The purpose of this is obvious: to help Lao Hu, to fabricate a comment that indicates that this is the opinion and attitude of foreigners on this matter. Then, go to the country and comment on it yourself.
The implication is that "look, those who do not support Lao Hu, look at the evaluation of us by the extranet, and look at the stupid things done by the official."
However, a reporter "fabricates" news out of thin air, which is even a loss of professional ethics.
Ding Taisheng paid his due price for his mouth. I don't know if Chen Qingqing will pay the price for his "stupid behavior".
For this matter, how does Lao Hu view this matter?
Old nonsense said that she was in her 30s, immature, and stunned
Advise everyone not to stand on a moral high ground and kidnap, not to embarrass a little girl
For Lao Hu's explanation, the public obviously cannot accept it. Because as a journalist, as a journalist, she clearly did something against her professional ethics.
Lao Hu did his best to maintain it, and in his personal opinion, it actually made the public ridicule. Lao Hu first fully introduced who Chen Qingqing was, told about her work performance, and said that she was a capable leader who rushed to the front line and was also a person who had made many contributions.
Such a good journalist cannot be targeted by the public because he is reckless and impulsive in his youth and has made a small mistake.
Lao Hu came forward to defend it, and also confirmed that the reporter had indeed made a mistake.
But to be honest, is it big news to take sides and discuss it internationally? Foreign countries are not always the voice of righteousness. Although there are 50, you can only see one. Of course, as the level of discussion gradually escalated. Subsequently, this matter still attracted a lot of attention.
But she, a journalist who did this, really discredited the profession and let foreign countries mock ZG reporters.
Obviously, if the extranet adds fuel to the matter, then she has to pay for her stupidity.
In addition, some friends who support solidarity said that she may be a little unethical in doing so, but making news is nothing new, and there is no need to make such a fuss. She was nothing more than summing up a bit, similar comments.
Is it true that professional ethics is a high standard and strict requirement for raising the profession? In fact, the meaning of professional ethics is to let every professional person stick to his or her professional bottom line. Why is it that whenever that kind of paid news and fabricated news is exposed, the public vigorously opposes it?
If in order to whitewash, do not hesitate to indulge in professional vices. That is really the difference between right and wrong, and the reporter adheres to the principle of factual objectivity to report, which will win the respect of the public. On the contrary, once you break the bottom line, then this sense of trust disappears.
There are some bottom lines that should not be touched and are taboo. Once it falls below the consensus of the public, then her or his credibility in the hearts of the public will go bankrupt.
In addition, there are only two possibilities for her to do such a brainless thing:
1, never realized the unreasonableness of doing so
2, eager to ask for credit to stand in line
Although professional people eventually belong to people, the prefix of occupation is the constraint on them
Doctors, journalists, teachers
Only when it is embodied in people will there be brilliance and shine, and in abstraction, its profession is more pure and sacred
Movie "To Cover the Mile", aka "Glass Truth"
Based on a realistic story
Stephen Glass is an assistant editor at The New Republic magazine in Washington
After graduating from the University of Pennsylvania in 1995, he joined the 90-year-old, influential magazine in the United States known for its political and social commentary.
Sleep-deprived work allowed Glass to easily win the approval of editor-in-chief Michael Kelly
But effort is not Stephen Glass's "superiority"
Stephen Glass got along very well with his colleagues, handsome, cute, sweet-mouthed, and at the same time very sweet. Everyone took the young man very seriously, and his arrival also brought the magazine "inexplicable good luck".
In three years, dozens of influential stories have been published in New Republic magazine and a number of nationally distributed publications, and Stephen, 25, has become a rising star.
He always encounters new and interesting fun
He can always smell different news
At the same time, he was very popular at the party
This new star is shining
Of course, this beauty would have been even more brilliant if he hadn't written that story
He just wrote a story for the online edition of the famous Fortune magazine called "Hacker's Paradise."
"Hacker's Paradise" is a documentary story about how a 15-year-old teenager hacked into the database of a company called "Jukt Micronics" and extorted tens of thousands of dollars from the company.
The material of this report is solid, vivid and lively, and it is deeply loved by readers
In the eyes of the layman, this may just be an interesting report. But in the eyes of insiders, this near-perfect report is almost impeccable.
Vivid and interesting style, coupled with many details of the characters. This article seems to allow the reader to read the "immersive" article, which is too perfect. As if everything, Stephen Glass had been involved and followed up on the report.
But when you search the content of this article with great interest, you find that the person in the article is either unidentified or the reality does not match the article.
This caught the attention of the editors of Fortune magazine
The editor of Fortune, the guy who realized new Republic magazine, may have been fooled by hackers
Charles Wren, the new editor-in-chief of The New Republic, quickly sets out to investigate, and a shocking hoax is revealed
In order to cope with the censorship of both editors, Stephen Glass can be described as painstaking
He was asked to hand over interview notes and the contact details of the characters in the articles to ensure their true validity
To know that a lie is woven, it takes a bigger lie to circle
In order to save his job, Stephen Grass faked the phone contact in the report. In order to prove the authenticity of the website in the report, a fake website was even rushed. But knowledgeable people can see through these "false evidences" at a glance.
When the two editors-in-chief saw through the alleged evidence one by one, Stephen Glass said he was furious and had been fooled.
The editor-in-chief knew that if this matter was announced, the magazine would be unlucky, and it would be a pity that the young star had fallen.
In order to save his own little reporter, his editor-in-chief decided to save another one. Pull Stephen Glass to follow the reported place and go to the clue man.
However, when the editor-in-chief visited one by one and after the field trip, the editor-in-chief collapsed
Apparently, Stephen Glass made up the news without paying attention to the reality
The editor-in-chief was furious that Stephen Glass not only fooled him, but also made the big mistake of fabricating the news.
No matter how MuchEn Glass struggled, begged for forgiveness, trusted relationships, asked colleagues for help, slandered the new editor-in-chief for suppressing himself, and so on
In front of everyone, he is a humble, sincere and shy person, who will ask others if they need to bring anything back before going out, and will discuss cosmetics with female colleagues
Stephen Glass is honest and talented, and the new official is a bit unflattering in the studio, and is even considered a bad guy who squeezes out the beloved and led for the sake of his subordinates.
Stephen Glass's image of the "weak" can lead to a kind of "righteousness" and "sense of justice" of others.
Stephen Glass is not only good looking and sociable, but also has a keen insight, he knows what kind of article is attractive to readers, and it is pulitzer. As a result, colleagues in the newsroom kept looking for Glass's help and gradually moved closer to Grasse.
In the past, it was smooth sailing, and then it was completely overturned
Nature is arrogant enough to completely fabricate news and make things up out of nothing
Chuck, the film's editor-in-chief, is portrayed as a lonely hero who endures humiliation and burdens, and he does his best to protect his subordinates morally and protectively. But he was not likable, and some people misunderstood.
So the editor-in-chief is under great pressure, all the suffering, he comes to swallow, only he is willing to dedicate, while at the same time adhering to the truth of the road.
The editor-in-chief would no longer believe him, and the editor-in-chief suspended him
When the editor-in-chief learned that the person Stephen Glass had made up in the article was actually Stephen Glass's brother in school.
This became the last straw that crushed the editor-in-chief's trust in Stephen Glass
The editor-in-chief fired Stephen Glass
At first, colleagues did not understand, believing that the new officer had fired Stephen Grass for the sake of Li Wei. But when it was understood that Stephen Glass had made up news fact more than once, they understood the editor-in-chief's good intentions.
The ambitious rising star reporter was swept out of the house
Stephen Glass, with his own law book, walked out the door, got into law school, and came up with a novel, The Liar.
The refinement of social activities has divided into different occupations
A profession has its particularities and necessities, and one can make the profession shine and may also make it dilapidated
Human beings have long purified their professions and summarized their commonalities as professional principles, and it is precisely by adhering to this principle that this profession is special, its professional talents have certain professional powers, and the professionals they engage in are respected.