A procuratorial police officer in Liaoning was accused of colluding with others to defraud a retired female judge in the local area, and at the trial he argued that he had only guaranteed 1 million yuan, saying that he was framed by the female judge and that he was not guilty, and he was later sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison. During the detention, he reported in real name that she was sitting on tens of millions of family property, and was suspected of having a huge amount of property of unknown origin. On October 11, the reporter learned from the interview that after the first-instance judgment was pronounced, he was not satisfied, so he filed an appeal, and the case is now revoked and remanded for retrial.
Group photo of Wang Mou (second from right) and Li Junjun (first from right) and others. Courtesy of respondents
Sun Liang, 41 years old this year, lives in a community in Fushun City, Liaoning Province, and was originally a staff member of the civil administrative procuratorial section of a local procuratorate.
His 74-year-old mother, Grandma Li, said that her son graduated from Liaoning University and later studied for a master's degree, and in 2005 he took the civil service exam and became a procuratorial policeman.
She recalled to reporters that on the afternoon of October 12, 2018, she suddenly received a call from a leader of her son's unit at home, saying that Sun Liang was taken away by the police in the office for investigation, saying that he was involved in a case, and the police who took him away came from the Huanggu District Public Security Bureau of Shenyang City. ”
The next day, she received a notice that Sun Liang had been criminally detained by the Huanggu District Public Security Bureau of Shenyang City on suspicion of fraud.
The reporter learned from the interview that the fraud case involving Sun Liang involved a 65-year-old old woman surnamed Wang in Liaoning, and some authoritative media reported that this old woman had served as a judge in the criminal division of the Liaoning Provincial High Court and retired as early as 2013.
The reporter's search found that on March 30, 2013, the Standing Committee of the Liaoning Provincial People's Congress announced the list of appointments and dismissals, including wang mou's name, and she was dismissed from the position of judge of the Liaoning Provincial High Court, when she was just 60 years old and reached the normal retirement age.
Sun Liang's mother, Grandma Li, told reporters that Wang's son is called Sun Weize, who used to be a lawyer in Shenyang, he and Sun Liang are graduate students of Liaoning University, and Sun Liang used to often visit their homes, "In November 2014, Sun Weize and his wife immigrated to New Zealand, and when his parents in his hometown in Shenyang encountered problems, they would also look for Sun Liang to help, and their relationship was very harmonious. ”
Grandma Li recalled that once, Wang Mou sold Tiens health products, repeatedly asked Sun Liang to recommend her offline, and later Sun Liang recommended a classmate Li Junjun, who was an employee of Fushun Rongda Investment Co., Ltd., whose father was originally a cadre of the Fushun Municipal Finance Bureau and his mother was a doctor.
At about 3 p.m. on August 1, 2018, Wang and his son Sun Weize suddenly came to the Sandongqiao Police Station of the Huanggu District Public Security Bureau of Shenyang City to report to the police that from November 2014 to February 2018, Li Junjun used the bait of obtaining high returns for Wang's investment and financial management, cheated her trust, and then defrauded her of more than 10 million yuan from her for various reasons, and then disappeared.
Wang said that in the past, Sun Liang often went to their home to play, she trusted Sun Liang very much, after the son and daughter-in-law immigrated, she and her husband because of their age, did not have the energy to run the 500 square meters of the family's hotel, she told Sun Liang, if there is a suitable person, she wants to cash out the hotel, collect rent can be, and then Sun Liang introduced Li Junjun to her acquaintance, saying that Li Junjun's unit to do capital allocation to shareholders, funds placed in him is very safe, every month proportional interest, the principal will not be lost, there is software control, When the stock fell to a certain extent, the software automatically stopped the loss, "Out of trust in Sun Liang, I promised to put the money to Li Junjun to try." ”
Wang said that on October 12, 2015, she transferred 1 million yuan to Li Junjun through the bank, with a monthly interest of 3 cents, "On December 21, 2015, the second payment was transferred to Li Junjun 500,000 yuan, which was transferred to him for the use of shareholders for the allocation of funds by the unit, and the monthly interest rate was also 3 points, paid to October 2016, a total of 150,000." Wang told the case-handling staff that on January 23, 2016, she transferred 1.849 million yuan to Li Junjun for the third time, "At that time, I had no money, I used the hotel I operated as collateral and borrowed 1.7 million yuan from a microfinance company." ”
Wang also said that as of December 8, 2017, she had transferred 16 payments to Li Junjun in succession, defrauding her of a total of 10.017 million yuan, and Li had paid her a total of 930,000 yuan in interest.
After receiving the report from Wang's mother and son, the Shenyang police attached great importance to it.
On August 7, 2018, the Huanggu Branch of the Shenyang Municipal Public Security Bureau decided to accept the case.
In mid-September of the same year, Li Junjun was arrested and arrested, and a month later, Sun Liang was taken away by the police for criminal detention.
On January 17, 2019, the Huanggu District Public Security Branch of Shenyang City investigated and closed the case and transferred it to the Huanggu District Procuratorate for review and prosecution. After accepting the case, the court held that some of the facts were unclear, and returned it to supplementary investigation twice, but due to the complexity of the case, it extended the period for review and prosecution once.
On July 1, 2019, the Huanggu District Procuratorate charged Li Junjun and Sun Liang with fraud and filed a public indictment with the Huanggu District Court.
Prosecutors allege that since October 12, 2015, Wang and his family have been defrauded of 7.5257 million yuan by Li Junjun and 940,000 yuan by Sun Liang in more than two years, and after the incident, the public security organs have recovered 120,000 yuan of stolen money and returned it to the victims.
Later, during the trial, Li Junjun said that at the beginning he borrowed Wang's 1 million yuan, and Sun Weize was not present when signing the agreement, "The borrower I signed was Li Junjun, Sun Liang signed the guarantor, Wang signed the investor, and Sun Liang and I both pressed the fingerprint." ”
He said that Sun Liang knew that he was a stock speculator, and Sun Liang's money was also placed in his place to speculate in stocks, "Sun Liang basically understands my situation, knows where I work, knows what I do, I and Wang met through Sun Liang's introduction, I later took money from her, I did not tell Sun Liang, Sun Liang did not know, Wang lent me money because she believed in Sun Liang, she believed in me." ”
Li Junjun also admitted that Sun Liang did not conspire with him to commit fraud, that Sun Liang's behavior was only a civil guarantee, and that Sun Liang did not understand stock securities.
Li Junjun's defender said that none of them constituted fraud, while Sun Liang, as the defendant, defended, "I did not commit fraud." ”
Sun Liang's two defenders defended him as innocent, in which defense lawyer Yu Jie said, "The facts alleged by the public prosecution organs are unclear, the evidence is insufficient, and the accusation of Sun Liang's crime is not established." ”
Lawyer Yu Jie believes that Li Junjun fabricated facts to defraud Wang, Sun Liang did not know about it, his guarantee behavior was a civil dispute, and the money that Li Junjun obtained from Wang in the later period was not known to Sun Liang, and Wang did not transfer money to Sun Liang.
Li Aijun, another defense lawyer of Sun Liang, believes that "the case is a civil dispute, and the defendant Sun Liang has no purpose of illegally possessing property, which does not constitute a fraud crime." ”
One of the facts ascertained by the Huanggu District Court was that when Wang lent the 1 million yuan to Li Suojun at a monthly interest rate of 3 cents, Sun Liang did make a guarantee, and later Li Junjun paid Interest to Wang on a monthly basis.
The court finally found that Li Junjun's fraud amount was 7.5257 million yuan and Sun Liang's fraud amount was 940,000 yuan.
The Huanggu District Court held that the defendants Li Junjun and Sun Liang, for the purpose of illegal possession, used fictitious facts and methods of concealing the truth to defraud public and private property, the amount of which was particularly huge, and their acts constituted the crime of fraud and should be punished according to law. The first fraud crime of the two is a joint crime, both are the main offenders, and shall be punished according to all the crimes in which they participated. Li Junjun who truthfully confessed his crime may be given a lighter punishment.
The court stated that the opinions of Li Junjun's defender that he did not constitute a crime of fraud, and the defense and opinion that Sun Liang and his defender had put forward that he did not constitute a crime of fraud, were inconsistent with the facts ascertained in the case, so Sun Liang's defense and defender's defense opinions were not accepted.
On December 24, 2019, the Huanggu District Court pronounced a verdict in the first instance that Li Junjun was convicted of fraud and sentenced to 14 years and 6 months in prison and fined 500,000 yuan, and Sun Liang was sentenced to 10 years and 6 months in prison and fined 100,000 yuan for fraud. At the same time, Li Junjun and Sun Liang were ordered to return 940,000 yuan to the victim Wang, and Li Junjun was ordered to return more than 6.07 million yuan to Wang.
After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, both Sun Liang and Li Jun shouted that they had been wronged, and they were not satisfied with this, and both appealed to the Shenyang Intermediate Court.
On September 8, 2020, after trial, the Shenyang Intermediate Court made a final ruling, saying that there were procedural problems in violation of the law in the original trial, and in accordance with relevant regulations, the Huanggu District Court revoked the criminal judgment of the Huanggu District Court and sent it back to the Huanggu District Court for a new trial.
The reporter learned from the interview that on September 18 of the same year, the Shenyang Municipal Intermediate People's Court issued a letter to the Huanggu District Court, saying that Li Junjun's three interrogation records with simultaneous audio and video recordings were all made by the same investigator, and that the investigators had an interest in Wang, and that two of the confessions were indeed problematic and had been withdrawn by the original public prosecution organ in court. Therefore, it is recommended to convene a pretrial conference to review the legality of Li Junjun's confession.
The letter also said that Sun Liang's defender had proposed that Wang had repeatedly claimed that he had a close relationship with the Huanggu District Court and had worked in the court for many years, and that the current vice president, Zhang Mou, had been her clerk at that time, and that there was evidence in the file to confirm that Wang had contacted the relevant personnel of the Huanggu District Court for approving Sun Liang's arrest and other issues, "Therefore, the recusal raised by the defender should also be resolved in the original pre-trial meeting." ”
It is reported that at present, the case has been transferred to the Shenyang Tiexi District Court for trial.
Sun Liang's mother said that after the incident, her son found clues such as Wang's interference in handling the case and the unknown source of a huge amount of assets from the "evidence collection report" issued by the police, and then wrote a 40,000-word real-name report letter in the detention center, the main content of which was that the former judge Wang Had bent the law for personal gain, collected huge bribes from the parties, illegally engaged in the legal profession as a judicial broker after retirement, illegally resold foreign currency, laundered money, and the source of huge amounts of property was unknown.
When reporting Wang's huge property problem, Sun Liang said that Wang, as a former judge of the Liaoning Provincial High Court, has tens of millions of family properties, and her family has 4 real estates alone, including a store worth about 6 million yuan in Yuhong District of Shenyang City, a property in Nujiang North Street in Yuhong District, a property in Venice City, Haikou, Hainan, and a property in Dalian.
When reporting Wang's deposits and investments, Sun Liang said she had more than 10 million deposits.
Sun Liang also reported that Wang transferred a large number of assets to New Zealand and purchased a villa of millions of yuan for his son Sun Weize, "In the Li Junjun fraud case, Wang also intervened in the case, bribed the relevant case-handling personnel, and framed me." ”
Sun Liang's mother believes that whether it is the WeChat records of Wang's mother and son, or the bank flow ascertained by the judicial organs, it can be proved that she found relevant case-handling personnel to frame her son Sun Liang in order to recover the loan.
So, is the content reported by Sun Liang true?
The reporter once called Wang Mou, she said that she became a lawyer after retirement, Sun Liang reported that the content is not true, the relevant departments have investigated her, and returned her innocence.
Southwest Business News Source Point News reporter Huang Ping sent from Fushun, Liaoning
Edited by Zhang Tianyi Reviewed by Shi Wenlong
【Copyright Notice】The copyright of this article belongs to [Source Point News Depth], today's headlines have obtained the exclusive authorization of the information network dissemination right, and any third party shall not be reproduced without authorization.