(Headline Number Original @ Warm Victoria Harbour)
On February 26, 2022, the president of Ukraine expressed his desire to negotiate reconciliation with the Russian military.
Ukraine is negotiating an armistice with Russia.
And that's when, this afternoon, Britain's Defence Secretary Wallace, along with ally the United States and a total of 28 other countries, attended a military aid donation conference.
The 28 countries voted collectively to donate weapons and ammunition to Ukraine, including anti-tank weapons, anti-aircraft weapons, and medical supplies.
In addition, the United Kingdom also said that the donated materials can be transported to the Russian-Ukrainian front.
On the surface, the British donated this batch of materials out of a humanitarian relief posture, but in fact there are other hidden reasons.
Ukraine was surrounded by russian fire.
For the sake of international image, Britain has taken the lead in speaking out, needing to sympathize with the weak, needing to let international public opinion condemn Russia, and at the same time praising our hero, Britain.
The United States and Britain, without fear of threats, protected Ukraine's interests and showed that Britain was not afraid of the Russian army and of Russia, which bullied the weak with the strong.
Let the whole world know that the Americans and the British can no longer look at it, we are going to donate weapons to Ukraine, we are going to donate medicines to Ukraine, we are going to let Ukraine continue to fight, and we are going to fight with Russia in the line of fire.
On the surface, Britain did indeed do a hero show, a hero who sympathized with the weak.
Britain and the United States jointly defended ukraine's rights, and the donated materials expressed sympathy for the weak.
Britain, let the international community see the figure of the big brother again, I did not support the strong, I did not support Russia, on the contrary, I want to sympathize with the weak, support Ukraine.
This is the international practice, the image of the British is very tall, in this performance, the United Kingdom acts as a savior.
As I said earlier: The U.S. military will not send troops to Ukraine, but he will send weapons, he will produce medicines, and he will let Ukraine continue to fight with Russia.
The U.S. military is afraid that Ukraine and Russia will choose to negotiate a settlement, so that U.S. interests will not be fully achieved.
It is conceivable that the current British and American countries, under the tilt of interests, will only allow Russia and Ukraine to maintain their activeness under the battle, so that Britain and the United States can take advantage of the opportunity.
But Ukraine became cannon fodder for the British to weaken the Russian firepower.
We've only heard of donating medicines and clothes, and wherever we've heard of weapons donations.
The United States, Britain and other 28 national alliances donated weapons to Ukraine, which is clearly to let Russia and Ukraine continue to fight!
Don't stop, keep fighting, fight until both sides are injured, the British move is really cruel.
Ukraine saw this batch of weapons, and now that there are arms, there is no need to reconcile, and it can continue to fight.
This time the British donated supplies, and the next time it was to sell supplies, that is, a full arms dealer.
Therefore, this time the batch of materials donated to Ukraine is only a preliminary use, and the next time is to sell the materials to you.
In fact, russia and Ukraine fought a war, injuring civilians, and the British and American troops donated weapons at this time, just like adding fuel to the fire.
Why did the British army take into account the civilian population in Ukraine? It is conceivable that this British approach is very unauthentic.
The British know what Ukraine wants, not weapons and ammunition, but to get Ukraine to join the EU and completely get rid of and provoke Russia. The EU is the troublemaker of the Russo-Ukrainian war.