laitimes

Russia-Ukraine conflict Historical feuds and geopolitical conflicts

author:cxcxXXXX
Russia-Ukraine conflict Historical feuds and geopolitical conflicts

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has become a recent hot spot, and there has been a war, which is actually very cruel, and it is the ordinary people who are suffering. In the face of war, it is difficult for ordinary people to be alone.

The contradiction between Ukraine and Russia is not the most important, the main contradiction between the United States and Russia, Ukraine has only become a pawn of the United States.

After the collapse of the former Soviet Union, Ukraine became an independent country, inheriting most of the Soviet Union's military enterprises, industrial manufacturing, etc., and even having its own nuclear weapons, and is a typical industrial power. Of course, there are also a large number of excellent scientific research talents. It is typical to eat the dividends of the former Soviet Union and issue a good hand. But how this painting got bigger and worse, it fell to this point today. The main thing is that political instability has not formed a strong government, and many times it is swayed by external forces, there is no autonomy, and it is impossible to balance between major powers.

In addition, the location of Ukraine is also too important, Ukraine is the meeting point of the European Union and Russia, and the last stop of NATO's eastward expansion can be said to be Ukraine. Taking Ukraine is equivalent to putting Russia under the muzzle of NATO's guns, can Russia agree?

Russia-Ukraine conflict Historical feuds and geopolitical conflicts

After the seizure of Russia from Crimea, the contradictions in Europe led by the United States gradually deepened, and economic sanctions against Russia began for more than a decade. After the loss of Crimea, Ukraine did not learn any lessons, but became deeper and deeper as a pawn of the United States.

In the aftermath of Crimea, the United States has been using the Ukrainian pawn to create conflict, but war has not yet broken out.

Why has it suddenly erupted recently? The director is still the United States, the debt crisis of the United States, urgently need to harvest. He could not count on the big countries in the East, and the opportunities in East Asia were not great and he did not grasp them. Harvesting Russia, with nothing to harvest, is unlikely. Then there is only europe, a big fat meat, relying on the United States for security, strategically inseparable from the United States, and on the surface independence is actually not much autonomy. To harvest Europe, only by creating a crisis can there be a chance. That Ukraine is certainly the best choice. Just hype up Ukraine's accession to NATO, raise the weapons, raise the funding. Of course, Russia has also seen through the careful thinking of the United States, that is, to accompany you to act. Then act, and it will not be a loss anyway.

After many stimuli, the war finally broke out. The United States will certainly not send troops, russia has long expected, can let go. After the outbreak of the war, the United States and Europe only gave symbolic sanctions, and Europe's attitude was very ambiguous, and it also needed Russian gas supply. This mentality in Europe has also been exploited by the United States, which knows that Europe is worried about Russia and needs Russia, and just happens to create some trouble.

It is better to hope that the war will end as soon as possible, find a peaceful solution to the problem, and do not let the people suffer.

Russia-Ukraine conflict Historical feuds and geopolitical conflicts

Read on