"Human World" is adapted from Liang Xiaosheng's original work of the same name, the novel is a narrative text, more restrained and calm, and the TV series, on the one hand, dilutes the conflict and contradiction caused by the background of the times, shifts the focus to family affection, on the other hand, the image picture itself is more full than the text, and the screenwriter likes to stir up emotions, so naturally, the audience's emotional fluctuations are more intense.
It can't be said that the TV series adaptation is not good, but when it comes to specific plots, most of the adaptations I think are not as good as the original.
The whole drama from about twenty episodes, the rhythm has begun to collapse, to Luo Shibin came back to grab the child is not collapsed but collapsed, from Nan Nan Yue Yue both admitted to Tsinghua, the plot completely collapsed to hopeless, really, two generations of 6 people, 2 Tsinghua 2 Peking University, Tsinghua Peking University is open for the Zhou family, right?
The two outrageous adaptations that I feel most incomprehensible and unacceptable in the whole play are about Zhou Rong and luo Shibin.
Again, I never think that novels cannot be adapted, as long as you change them well, but please don't be clever and change the essence into shit!
Zhou Rong I have written before, the original quite attractive goddess, to the play, became the first hated selfish ghost in the whole play.
I thought that after marrying Cai Xiaoguang, the screenwriter would let her "return to normal", but I did not expect that in order to close the distance with her daughter, she fully supported Yue Yue's love affair with Nan Nan, and even ran to find Zheng Juan for this purpose, completely disregarding people's lives...
Then Nan Nan accidentally died, she actually took the sad Yue Yue to the hometown of Guizhou to revisit, only the affairs of their mother and daughter are counted, and the affairs of other people in the family are not counted.
In the original work, at this time, Zhou Rong and Yue Yue were still far away in France, and when they learned that Zhou Nan had died, the mother and daughter went to the United States to accompany Zheng Juan with Hao Dongmei to deal with Zhou Nan's posthumous affairs.
What makes the drama version of Zhou Rong especially look abominable is that at this time, Zhou Bingkun was imprisoned for beating Luo Shibin, including Cai Xiaoguang, a brother-in-law who is not related by blood, Hao Dongmei, a sister-in-law who is not related by blood, and the whole family is running for the affairs of Bingkun's family, only her sister Zhou Rong is "out of the way" because she took her daughter out to relax.
I really don't understand why the screenwriter has such a deep hatred for Zhou Rong!
Even Song Jia's mother said that she abandoned the drama and could not watch it.
No one is more suitable than Song Jia to play Zhou Rong in the original work, if the performance is good, how brilliant it will be!
Liang Xiaosheng also said in the interview that it is regrettable that he did not use such an excellent actor as Song Jia.
I don't understand, invite such a suitable actor for the role, but change to such an off-topic persona, what is the crew's plan?
Because of the epidemic, I can't go to France to shoot, but this is probably not the focus, the domestic drama is not also adapted into garbage, is it not smelly to go abroad to shoot?
While weakening the charm of female characters, the screenwriter also outputs the line "men's lower kitchen women rest" when they are unnecessary: You see how much I respect women, what are you not satisfied?
Respecting women is to treat women as people from the heart, not to shout slogans!
Compared with the adaptation of Zhou Rong, which can be called "vicious", the screenwriter is only full of tolerance and good feelings for scumbags and rapists.
In the original work, Feng Huacheng, a scumbag who was dumped by Zhou Rong early on because of his derailment, became as if he could not stand Zhou Rong's unreasonable derailment, and actually decided to "change his former wrongs" and let himself become "feminine" Zhou Rong was dumped by him.
Even more outrageous is Luo Shibin.
Whether in the book or in the play, he is a rapist through and through.
Committing rape in that era, he may have escaped punishment for various reasons, but the original author set him to lose his fertility and die early, which is a retribution.
Such an evil person, even if he benefits from the changes of the times and makes money by exploiting loopholes, the evil in his bones will not change, so in the original work, when he returned to rob Zhou Nan with Zhou Bingkun, he was still a bad face that was high above, and finally angered Zhou Bingkun, fell into a vegetative state by himself, and then died, and the property was inherited by his legal wife.
Who would have thought that such a villain in the original work, who has evil retribution and does not have much drama, has a large section to show how he makes money but has the wisdom of people, shows how he repents and rehabilitates and has a good relationship with the Zhou family, and shows how he has a broad vision and gradually makes Zhou Nan gradually accept him...
Why should the audience watch this???!!!
The original is mainly about the story of the northeast, the development of the south is only a brush stroke, the screenwriter wants to be as comprehensive as possible when adapting, even with the story of Shenzhen to tell a story, this I can understand, so the screenwriter original Lao Yao such a role, but, no, you can create a few more bosses, so many people in China, why do you have to let Luo Shibin, the rapist, represent the people who are struggling to open the frontier business???
Even the rape he had committed had become acceptable, and the people had only been confused for a while and did not allow the prodigal son to turn back?
Just like Shui Ziliu said, people are just drunk and out of shape, can't help themselves, no matter how Zhou Nan's body bleeds his blood!
Yes, in the original work, it was felt that the child should not recognize the thief as a father and help Zhou Bingkun's water flow freely, but in the play, it became Luo Shibin's dog leg, and the emperor was not anxious for eunuchs, and he was even more disgusting than Luo Shibin.
All in all, even the victim Zheng Juan and even Zhou Bingkun, who wanted to beat him so much, didn't care, why did the audience still cling to it?
Besides, Luo Shibin was indeed very good to Zhou Nan, and it really helped Zhou Nan open his vision, didn't he?
Even Zheng Juan and Zhou Bingkun are willing to raise their sons with him, and Zhou Nan has already called him "Dad".
What a good loving father, the screenwriter gave him a tough loving father not to mention how successful, where to use Zhou Nan to open his mouth, there are already a group of people shouting dad in the barrage.
This good father is really easy, raping a woman, making her pregnant, waiting for her and other men to work hard to raise the child, he will spend some money to get his son back, who does not rush to be pawned?
I also saw someone asking, why didn't Luo Shibin marry Zheng Juan, wasn't that just a family of three?
They all laughed.
If he wants to rape, he will rape, if he wants to marry, he can "reform" in the future, Zheng Juan's wishes are completely unimportant, right?
As long as he is willing to change, the suffering that Zheng Juan has suffered can be regarded as if it did not happen at all, right?
How much does the screenwriter prefer the character of Luo Shibin?
Even Zhou Nan's death became a tool for him to wash his whites.
In the original work, Luo Shibin died long ago, Zhou Bingkun was imprisoned for 12 years, Zhou Nan studied abroad at public expense, unfortunately encountered a campus shooting, he died in order to cover for others.
After Nan Nan reunited with Zhou Rong and Yue Yue's mother and daughter in France for a few days, just after returning to the university in the United States, the tutor happily told him that the school had approved him as the tutor's assistant teacher. In the United States, mentors have great autonomy, especially for highly prestigious professors. Because teaching assistants are paid, most of the salary must be paid by the school, and the procedure still requires the approval of the school. His mentor is an authority on the construction of the legal system in the East, and many cases are needed to support the establishment of the theory, and Zhou Nan's help in this regard is indispensable. The tutor was happy to have him, a Chinese student, as his assistant teacher, but this caused some misunderstanding and jealousy. One day, when class was about to end, a boy suddenly broke into the classroom and raised a gun to shoot indiscriminately. When the muzzle of the gun was aimed at a female student, Zhou Nan blocked in front of her. The boy did not hesitate to pull the trigger, but the pistol jammed. The other party quickly turned the muzzle of the gun and aimed it at another frightened girl, Zhou Nan covered himself for the second time, and the pistol was stuck again. The muzzle of the gun turned again to the helpless old professor, and Zhou Nan thought that there was no bullet in the gun and pounced. The gun rang out and a bullet went into his chest.
This paragraph of the original is written in a bit of haste, the gangster's gun is stuck twice, Zhou Nan blocked the gun three times in a row, but if you want to adapt a more reasonable, in fact, it is not difficult, and the result is that the drama has changed more nerves.
Zhou Nan and his friend encountered a gun robber on the road, because before going abroad, Luo Shibin had told him to pay money when he encountered robbery - Luo Shibin was really a good person who saw a lot of people, so Zhou Nan directly gave his wallet to people, but his friend was unwilling to give money, so he blocked the gun for his friend.
Unlike the campus shooting case that shoots innocent people indiscriminately and almost has no time to react, the robbers who block the road and rob are for money and not for life, the victims should have a reaction time, Zhou Nan can at least persuade his friends to save their lives first, the result is that the plot is rushed to the robbers to shoot directly, but such a close distance, you can directly fight with the robbers, and as a result, Zhou Nan is directly tired of blocking the gun...
It's like a box lunch for the sake of a box lunch, just like a joke!
Don't you want any INTELLIGENCE?
Looking at luo Shibin's death, in the original work, it is clear that Zhou Nan was fooled by Luo Shibin to go abroad, Zhou Bingkun was angry and went to find Luo Shibin, at this time Luo Shibin was still deliberately provoking him, so there was an accident in the fight, and the result became that Zhou Nan was dead Luo Shibin was not dead, Luo Shibin and Zhou Nan's father and son had a deep affection, not only paid for Zhou Nan's death, but also personally went abroad...
He even desperately stopped Zhou Bingkun from arguing, and then the two fought, and Luo Shibin became a vegetative person...
So innocent and poor Luo Shibin!
I will not say the three views first, this adaptation in the play, even the basic logic is not smooth.
In the original work, when Nan Nan died, Zhou Bingkun had just been released from prison, and after hearing the bad news, he directly vomited blood and fell ill and was hospitalized, as the head of the family, Zhou Bingyi arranged for Cai Xiaoguang to stay in the hospital to take care of Zhou Bingkun, Hao Dongmei accompanied Zheng Juan and Zhou Cong to the United States, and he also called Zhou Rong's mother and daughter who were far away in France to go to the United States to help.
Zhou Bingkun was hospitalized. Twelve years of imprisonment made his body look stronger, but Nannan's unexpected death knocked him down at once, and he was weak. The doctor said that although there was no danger, it would certainly be unwise to go abroad at this time.
However, in the play, when Nan Nan died, the Zhou family was normal and healthy and in China, so Zhou Bingkun, as Zheng Juan's husband and Zhou Nan's nominal father, what reason did he have not to go to the United States to pick up Nan Nan?
Just to stay in China and wait for Luo Shibin to come to the door, and then symbolically walk through the original plot, let the two fight, Luo Shibin die, and Zhou Bingkun go to prison, right?
There is also Zhou Rong, as Zhou Bingkun's well-informed sister who traveled south and north, and as Zhou Nan's "mother-in-law", why is it not that she and Yue Yue accompanied Zheng Juan to the United States, but Hao Dongmei's sister-in-law was busy before and after?
Not to mention the blood relationship between Zhou Rong and Zhou Bingkun, just Yue Yue, with her willfulness in the play and the depth of her feelings with Nan Nan, shouldn't she cry and shout at this time to go abroad to pick up Nan Nan?
Taking ten thousand steps back, even if Zhou Bingkun can't go, he is also an "outsider", so it is more reasonable for Cai Xiaoguang, who is a man, to accompany Zheng Juan to the United States than Hao Dongmei - in fact, the original book was also such a plan at the beginning, after all, it is the United States that may be shot at any time!
Anyway, up to now, the whole play has no logic at all, and the screenwriter's task is to let the strange people continue to surprise new heights, let the good people suffer and even die to desperately stir up tears, as if as long as the audience scolds enough and cries enough, there is no energy to worry about the plot.
I'll go to you!"
#Which details of "The World" resonate with the audience #