2K adjusts the ability values of some players:
Garland 87(+1)
Dechontai-Murray 87(+1)
Wiggins 85(+1)
In this wave of adjustments, only one person was reduced in ability points, that is, Westbrook, which was reduced by 2 points, and now the ability value is only 79, which is the first time since his rookie season that the ability value is less than 80 (77 in the rookie season).
By the way, thunder rookie Josh Gidey's latest ability value is 80.
It seems that Oklahoma City really has their new owner, and no one misses Wei Shao.
What's more tragic is that Wei Shao's basketball IQ is only F, F ah, that is, fail.
What does Ball Quotient F mean? This means that 2K feels that all the decisions that Wei Shao made on the field are incorrect, the passing choice is incorrect, the timing of the breakthrough is incorrect... What's wrong with that.
In an interview today, the Magician said: "Westbrook must adapt to the way the Lakers ask him to play now, and can't think about how he played in the past, that doesn't matter." ”
The meaning is obvious, that is, Wei Shao's current way of playing is not suitable for the Lakers, and he must change himself to adapt to the Lakers.
Not long ago, the Lakers also said that Wei Shao did not have to change himself, let him be himself, and play according to his own way.
You say, this will make him be himself, one will let him change himself, Wei Shao estimated that he was also quite confused, Hongu really felt that Wei Shao would not be able to play.
So what was The original way of playing with Westbrook?
All kinds of ball holding breakthroughs, long time possession, killing the inside line.
What did the Lakers ask Wei Shao to do?
Run without the ball, pull away the space, project from the periphery...
Well, none of them are good at Wei Shao.
So it's still that question, the one that has been asked since the beginning of the season: If you need a player who runs without the ball and has the ability to shoot from the periphery, why did you bring in Westbrook in the first place? He seriously does not meet this requirement.
If you just need a player who holds the ball for half of the field, and then has a little bit of no-ball running ability, and can catch the ball and shoot 3 points, then is it not good to leave Caruso in the first place? He's also a lot cheaper!
Even a direct extension of Schroeder's contract is better than it is now. At least don't wait for the rocket to buy out and then pick up Schroeder.